Volume 47, Issue 11 e2020GL088403
Research Letter
Free Access

Large-Scale Extreme Rainfall-Producing Synoptic Systems of the Indian Summer Monsoon

Akshaya C. Nikumbh

Corresponding Author

Akshaya C. Nikumbh

Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Correspondence to: A. C. Nikumbh,

[email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Arindam Chakraborty

Arindam Chakraborty

Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Search for more papers by this author
G. S. Bhat

G. S. Bhat

Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Divecha Centre for Climate Change, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, India

Search for more papers by this author
Dargan M. W. Frierson

Dargan M. W. Frierson

Department of Atmospheric Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 May 2020
Citations: 19


In recent years India has been increasingly experiencing widespread floods induced by large-scale extreme rainfall events (LEREs). LEREs are mainly associated with monsoon low-pressure systems (LPS). The forecast of these high-flood-potential events, however, has remained challenging. Here, we compare LPSs of the summer monsoon that led to LEREs (LPS-Lg) and strong LPSs that did not result in LEREs (LPS-noLg) over central India for the period 1979–2012. We show that having a strong LPS is not a sufficient condition to produce LEREs, and the LPS-Lgs are accompanied by secondary cyclonic vortices (SCVs). The simultaneous existence of an LPS and an SCV creates a giant midtropospheric vortex. SCVs enhance dynamic lifting, static instability, and moisture transport from the Arabian Sea that precondition the atmosphere for deep convection. SCVs also slow down the propagation of LPSs. We show that the interaction of synoptic-scale systems can lead to LEREs even if individual systems are not strong enough.

Key Points

  • A mechanism for large-scale extreme rainfall events of central India is proposed
  • Large-scale extreme rainfall events occur when monsoon low-pressure systems are assisted by secondary cyclonic vortices
  • The interaction of two cyclonic vortices form conditions favorable for long-lived, organized, and slow-moving convective systems

Plain Language Summary

Over the past two decades, India has endured many widespread floods caused by large-scale heavy rainfall events during the monsoon season that resulted in huge losses to life and property. The large-scale heavy rainfall events, though rare, have become more frequent recently. We show that these events occur when multiple monsoon low-pressure systems are present at the same time. While the individual systems themselves need not be very strong, their simultaneous presence makes the environment conducive for sustained and organized deep convection, leading to large-scale heavy rainfall events over central India.

1 Introduction

Understanding the physical processes that lead to extreme rainfall events (EREs) is a challenging multiscale problem that has received wide attention in the literature. The literature on EREs includes aspects like flash floods (Bosart & Sanders, 1981; Maddox et al., 1978, 1979), convective systems (Doswell III et al., 1996; Schumacher & Johnson, 2005), the observed trends (Goswami et al., 2006; Karmakar et al., 2017; Nikumbh et al., 2019; Rajeevan et al., 2008), and their future projections (Emori & Brown, 2005; Muller et al., 2011; O'Gorman, 2015; Trenberth, 1999). A multitude of extreme precipitation events, however, remained unpredicted (Coumou & Rahmstorf, 2012). Predicting the location and intensity of extreme precipitation and avoiding false alarms continue to be major challenges in weather forecasting. Though EREs have different features based on their time and location, there are certain common characteristics that can be used for their forecasting. The ingredients for extreme precipitation include moist ascent, static instability, dynamic lifting, and moisture supply (Doswell III et al., 1996). These ingredients are often brought together in the presence of synoptic systems and hence EREs are often associated with synoptic systems.

During the Indian summer monsoon season, a large part of kinetic energy at midlevels is contributed by synoptic systems such as low-pressure systems (LPSs) and midtropospheric cyclones (MTCs) that form over the surrounding ocean and the Indian subcontinent (Krishnamurti & Hawkins, 1970). LPSs form most frequently over the Bay of Bengal (BoB) and move northwestward over the Indian subcontinent ( Godbole, 1977; Sikka, 1977). They contribute around half of the rainfall over the core monsoon zone (Hunt & Fletcher, 2019; Sikka, 1977) and often lead to heavy rainfall events over central India (Ajayamohan et al., 2010). The southwestern sector of LPSs is known to receive heavy rainfall, often exceeding 300 mm day−1 (Godbole, 1977; Krishnamurthy & Ajayamohan, 2010). In the past two decades, India has experienced many devastating floods triggered by extreme rainfall, namely, the Kerala flood of August 2018 (Baisya & Pattnaik, 2019), Chennai flood of December 2015 (Chakraborty, 2016; Phadtare, 2018), Uttarakhand flood of June 2013 (Houze Jr et al., 2017), Leh flood of June 2010 (Rasmussen & Houze Jr, 2012), and Mumbai flood of July 2005 (Kumar et al., 2008). Though each individual event had unique features, the common thread in all events was the presence of an LPS. In every season around 15 to 18 LPSs are observed (Figure 1a) and almost two thirds produce at least one ERE over central India and remaining 33% do not give extreme rainfall. A comprehensive understanding of the conditions that stimulate LPSs to produce EREs is missing. To address the problem of false alarms it is important to understand the conditions under which LPSs are more likely to give rainfall extremes.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Seasonal counts of monsoon low-pressure systems (LPSs) that lead to extreme rainfall events (LPS-ERE), LPSs that did not lead to an ERE (LPS-noERE), LPSs that lead to LEREs (LPS-Lg), and strong LPSs (intensity ≥ 2) that did not cause LEREs (LPS-noLg) observed during the study period (1979–2012). (b) Spatial distribution of LEREs and the JJAS climatology of geopotential height at 500 hPa. The count of LEREs is normalized by the maximum count over the study region (15 – 25°N, 65 – 85°E). Track density of (c) LPS-Lg and (d) LPS-noLg. The track density is the number of tracks of LPSs per grid and is normalized with respect to the maximum value over the region (0 – 30°N, 60 – 90°E). The dotted inset box in Figure 1b represents the study region (15 – 25°N, 65 – 85°E).

EREs over the west coast of India are often associated with synoptic systems such as MTCs, offshore troughs, and vortices (Carr, 1977; Francis & Gadgil, 2006; Pradhan et al., 2015). An active offshore trough (Wang, 2006) and mesoscale vortices (George, 1956) often lead to heavy rainfall reaching over 300 to 500 mm day−1 near the west coast (Wang, 2006). Past studies have extensively examined the influence of MTCs and offshore trough/vortices on heavy rainfall events over the western states (Carr, 1977; Francis & Gadgil, 2006; Pradhan et al., 2015). However, the possibility of synoptic systems of the west coast influencing heavy rainfall events further eastward, over central or eastern Indian states has not been explored  yet.

It has been observed that the Large-scale EREs (LEREs, area ≥70 × 103 km2) over central India are increasing significantly (Nikumbh et al., 2019). The LEREs are of a great concern as they are more likely to cause widespread flooding compared to small-scale scattered events. For example, the recent flood over India in the first week of August 2019 (https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145460/heavy-monsoon-rains-flood-south-asia), Kerala flood of mid-August 2018 (Baisya & Pattnaik, 2019), and Gujarat flood of July 2017 (https://ndma.gov.in/images/guidelines/gujrat-flood-study-2017.pdf) were caused by the widespread EREs that spanned over the entire state and resulted in hundreds of deaths. This underscores the urgency of improving an understanding of the physical process that lead to LEREs. The LEREs of the Indian summer monsoon are predominantly associated with monsoon LPSs (Nikumbh et al., 2019). During the monsoon season there is a high chance (probability = 0.66) of getting an ERE over central India given an LPS; however, probability of getting an LERE is extremely rare (probability = 0.04) (Figure 1a). This poses some interesting questions: Why do so few LPSs result in LEREs? Are LEREs associated with some of the strongest and rare LPSs? In this study we pursue these questions by comparing characteristics of LPSs and meteorological conditions that lead to LEREs (LPS-Lg) and strong LPSs (intensity ≥ 2) that did not result in LEREs (LPS-noLg).

2 Data Sets and Methods

We use the daily 1° ×  1° gridded rainfall data set prepared by the India Meteorological Department(IMD) (Rajeevan et al., 2006) for the monsoon months (June to September) of the period 1979 to 2012. The EREs are defined following the same procedure as in Nikumbh et al. (2019). The 99.5th threshold is used to define extreme rainfall at each grid and then the neighboring grids with simultaneous extreme precipitation are combined using the connected component labeling algorithm (Falcão et al., 2004). The EREs that span over an area more than five 1° ×  1° grids (area ≥70 × 103 km2) are defined as LEREs. Then we iteratively check the consecutive days of EREs to find if there is an overlap over at least one grid cell of the location of EREs. If an overlap in the locations of EREs exist for the consecutive days, only the first day of the largest EREs is considered for the calculation. This makes sure that the same event is not counted again. Over the Indian subcontinent, the LEREs occur mainly between 15° to 25°N (Nikumbh et al., 2019), and we select this region (15–25°N, 65–85°E) as our study area (boundaries shown in Figure 1b). Over the study region, 24 such LEREs were observed from 1979 to 2012.

The data set by Hurley and Boos (2015) is used for LPSs. This data set identifies LPSs using ERA-Interim 850 hPa relative vorticity. They applied an automated tracking algorithm (Hodges, 1995; 1999) on a 6-hourly 850 hPa relative vorticity field. The tracking algorithm is based on the optimization of the cost function for motion (Hodges, 1999). It is used to identify relative vorticity maxima (or minima in the Southern Hemisphere) and to track its path. Only those vortices are considered whose maxima (or minima) exceeds a magnitude of 0.5 × 10−5 s−1. Additional filtering criteria includes that the LPS should last for two or more days and should have at least one point of the track in the monsoon region. They use additional criteria of the mean sea level pressure anomaly and surface wind speed (10 m) to define the intensity of LPS. The Intensities 1 and 2 correspond to monsoon lows (pressure anomaly ≥ 2 hPa) and depressions (pressure anomaly between 4 to 10 hPa and wind speed between 8.5 and 13.5 m s−1), respectively. Intensity 3 indicates deep depression and above (pressure anomaly ≥ 10 hPa and wind speed ≥13.5 m s−1). The presence of LPSs is checked for each LERE within the domain of 10–30°N, 65–85°E (LPS domain). Out of 24 LEREs, 22 had the presence of LPSs. We compare these 22 LPSs that led to LEREs (LPS-Lg) and 132 strong LPSs (intensity ≥ 2) that passed through the LPS domain but did not cause LEREs (LPS-noLg). For the meteorological variables, the daily data from the ECMWF interim reanalysis (ERA-Interim Dee et al., 2011) is used, at the spatial resolution of 1° ×  1°.

Secondary cyclonic vortices (SCVs) to the west of LPSs are confirmed by relative vorticity maps (Figures S1 and S2 in the supporting information). The type of weather systems associated with SCVs are verified using the IMD weather reports. The SCVs are reported either as cyclonic circulation or monsoon lows in the IMD weather report (details in the supporting information).

3 Results and Discussions

3.1 LPSs and EREs

The average number of LPSs observed over the study region per season is 15. Around 66% of LPSs during the study period were associated with at least one ERE over the study region. Though the number of LPSs that results in EREs varies from year to year (Figure 1a), there is not a single year when LPSs of the monsoon season did not cause any ERE over central India. This supports the idea of a strong association between EREs over central India and LPSs. On the other hand, there are two to five LPSs in a season that pass through central India without causing any EREs and thus underscore the uncertainty tied to this association between LPSs and  EREs.

The relative vorticity distribution (Figure S3) for the two types of LPSs show that the LPS-Lg have a higher median vorticity (7 × 10−5 s−1) than LPS-noLg (6 × 10−5 s−1). However, there are many LPSs in LPS-noLg that had higher relative vorticity than LPS-Lg. During the study period, out of the nine strongest LPSs (with intensity ≥ 3) only three led to LEREs. On the other hand, 82% of LEREs were associated with LPSs with intensity ≥ 2. This suggests that the LPSs that lead to the LEREs tend to be stronger, but their strength is not a sufficient condition to get LEREs.

3.2 Large-Scale EREs

The LEREs show a peculiar geographical preference. They occur mainly over the zonal belt in between the frequent locations of synoptic systems of the east and west coast (Figure 1b). The mean seasonal climatology of geopotential height at midlevels captures these two frequent locations of synoptic systems that have centers around ∼ 84°E and ∼ 72°E (Karmakar et al., 2015). As LPSs of the east coast are more frequent, the eastern location is better defined with sharper gradients than the west. Note that both of these centers are present around the same latitudinal belt (18 – 20°N) with the west center being slightly southward (∼ 18°N). Consequently, there are two locations where the LEREs occur most frequently, one near the east coast (∼ 80°E) and the other near the west coast (∼ 76°E). The climatological surface monsoon trough (Rao, 1976) and low-level jet (LLJ, shown in Figure S4) (Findlater, 1969; Joseph & Sijikumar, 2004) lie on the northern and southern sides of LEREs, respectively.

The LEREs occur in the southwestern sector of LPSs (Nikumbh et al., 2019). We observe that the LPS-Lg are accompanied by SCVs on their western flank (Figure S1). Of all the SCVs that occurred with LPS-Lg, 57% were identified as cyclonic circulation and 24% as monsoon lows in the IMD weather reports. The cyclonic circulation includes the lower- or middle-tropospheric systems, and the monsoon lows refers to the lows, depressions, and cyclonic storms. 19% of SCVs were not identified as weather systems by the IMD; however, the presence of a vortex (vorticity ≥2 × 10−5 s−1 at 500 and 850 hPa) has been manually verified using the vorticity map (Figures S1 and  S2).

There are two frequent genesis regions for LPS-Lg over the BoB, one at 20°N and the other at 15°N (Figure 1c). The LPS-Lg tracks are southward compared to LPS-noLg. The LPS-Lg show a westward extension of LPSs tracks. The LPS-noLg have a shorter path and their genesis locations are mainly observed in the north BoB (∼ 20°N) (Figure 1d). As the LPSs on the southern side are more likely to encounter the effect of synoptic systems of the west coast (Figure 1c), the genesis location and track density of LPS-Lg paths show a peak on the southern side (∼ 15°N). The westward extension of the path of LPS-Lg possibly indicates a long lifetime of LPS-Lg. In the next sections, we examine how the interaction between LPSs and SCVs lead to LEREs.

3.3 Midtropospheric Vortex, Dynamic Lifting, and Organized Convergence

Two days before the LEREs, the presence of both an LPS over the BoB and an SCV over the west coast is evident at 500 hPa (Figure 2a). The LPS continues to move westward and the circulations associated with both vortices merge a day before the event. This leads to the formation of a giant midtropospheric cyclonic vortex (MCV) over central India. An MCV is often observed in long-lived mesoscale convective systems (MCSs) (Bartels & Maddox, 1991, 1997; Fritsch et al., 1994). A vorticity budget analysis suggests that it forms by advection of vorticity from the environment and generation of vorticity by MCSs themselves (Knievel & Johnson, 2002, 2003). MCSs that develop a stratiform region perturb the vertical temperature gradient and tends to concentrate positive potential vorticity at midlevel, which manifests as a midlevel vortex (Raymond & Jiang, 1990). The MCV in turn promotes new convection and extends the lifetime of MCSs (Fritsch et al., 1994; Raymond & Jiang, 1990). MCVs also help in organizing the deep convection (Schumacher & Johnson, 2009). The midlevel vortex generated by interaction of LPS and SCV thus could help in forming long-lived organized convection conducive for widespread extreme rainfall.

Details are in the caption following the image
Lagged composites of anomalous (a) geopotential height (m), wind ( urn:x-wiley:grl:media:grl60649:grl60649-math-0001) at 500 hPa, (b) pressure velocity ( urn:x-wiley:grl:media:grl60649:grl60649-math-0002), and (c) wind divergence (s−1), wind (m s−1) at 850 hPa for LPS-Lg from Day(−2) to Day(0) (left to right). Day-0 indicates the day of LERE. The pressure velocity is meridionally averaged from 15° to 25°N. The dotted contour and hatching represent statistically significant anomalies for geopotential height (t test: p value <  0.01) and pressure velocity (t test: p value <  0.05), respectively.
Strong ascent associated with the LPS and a comparatively weaker SCV ascent are apparent in the vertical structure of pressure velocity (omega) (Figure 2b). Rising motion is observed on the west and sinking motion on the east of cyclonic vortices, as observed in earlier studies (Krishnamurti & Hawkins, 1970; Sikka, 1977). Both SCV and LPS exist in an easterly sheared environment owing to reversal of the meridional temperature gradient. The interaction of these vortices with easterly shear produces the maximum ascent on the western side (Rao & Rajamani, 1970; Sanders, 1984). This can be simply shown by using an approximate form of the quasi-geostrophic equation (Boos et al., 2015; Sutcliffe, 1947; Trenberth, 1978)

where Δ-Laplacian operator, w pressure velocity, f and fo are the Coriolis parameter, and the mean Coriolis parameter, respectively, and ug and ξg are the geostrophic wind and its relative vorticity, respectively. The right-hand side of Equation 1 gives the dynamic generation of rising motion downshear of a vorticity maximum. The temperature distribution and warm advection also contribute to ascent on the western side of these systems (Adames & Ming, 2018a, 2018b).

The ascent of the SCV is horizontally narrow, vertically not that deep, and stays almost at the same location (from Day-2 to Day-0). The westward moving LPS has a larger spatial extent and is deeper too. The orographic flow (leeward subsidence) associated with the Western Ghats is possibly preventing the low-level connection between the two (Figure 2b). There is also a location of ascent at the junction of LPS and SCV, resulting from the convergence at the meeting point of two systems. At Day-0, the ascents merge and form a spatially large ascending region. It has been observed that the long-lived cloud systems are preferentially triggered on the western flank of LPSs, where a steep gradient of low-level vorticity and temperature is present (Phadtare & Bhat, 2019). The gradients in vorticity and temperature help in setting up the rising motion (e.g., using QG omega equation) that results in forming a favorable region for long-lived cloud systems on the western flank of LPSs. The large long-lived clouds systems occur on the western flank of LPSs mainly in the band of 15–25°N (Figure 11 of Phadtare & Bhat, 2019), which coincides with the location of LEREs of our study. It should also be noted that the adiabatic lifting is not sufficient to explain the deep convective systems on the western flank of LPSs (Adames & Ming, 2018b, 2018a; Boos et al., 2015) and other processes that include moist thermodynamics also add ascent. The moist thermodynamic processes are explored in the section 3.4.

Two days prior to the event, a low-level convergence zone forms on the western side of LPSs, and the north eastern side of SCV (Figure 2c). A day before the event two convegerence zone strengthen as the LPS moves westward. On the day of the event both of them merge and form a large-scale organized convergence zone that has northwest-southeast orientation. This convergence zone could in turn support the organized convective systems, leading to widespread EREs. Only the southern part of this convergence zone experiences the LEREs.

3.4 Thermodynamic Instability and Moisture Supply

The presence of an SCV provides moist thermodynamic instabilities that play a major role in enhancing the rainfall intensity. Figure 3a shows the vertical cross section of dry static stability, namely, Brunt Vaisala frequency ( urn:x-wiley:grl:media:grl60649:grl60649-math-0004). Two days before the event, centers of static instabilities exist at midlevel over central India that are generated by convective heating associated with SCV and LPS. These instabilities merge a day before the event and the anomalies associated with the LPSs intensify even at lower levels. On the day of the event, these instabilities intensify throughout the column up to 250 hPa over central India forming a favorable environment for deep convection.

Details are in the caption following the image
(a) Lagged composite of static stability anomalies for LPS-Lg from lag Day(-2) to Day(0). The anomalies are meridionally averaged from 15°N to 25°N. The hatching represents statistically significant anomalies (t test: p value <  0.05). Composite vertically integrated moisture divergence (shading) and moisture transport (vectors) anomalies for (b) LPS-Lg on the LERE day and for (c) LPS-noLg at the middle location of the LPS track.

To examine the effects of moisture, we compare the vertical profiles of potential temperature (θ) and equivalent potential temperature (θe) (Figure S5). The moisture supply by the LLJ at low levels is evident since Day-2 and it peaks on the day of the event. At Day-2, the vertical profiles of θ and θe are similar at upper levels, indicating that moisture effects are small there. At Day-1, the θe deviates slightly from that of θ at midlevels as the moisture flux increases. On the day of the event, θ and θe profiles substantially deviate, indicating a strong moistening throughout the column. Moisture plays an important role in the growth and sustenance of LPSs (Adames & Ming, 2018a). Using a linear framework, Adames and Ming (2018b) studied the relative importance of dry and moist processes in growth and propagation of LPSs. They found that moist processes play a major role in the growth of LPSs. It should be noted that their analysis does not consider the strong background flow and vertical shear that occur during the monsoon. However, it is useful to infer that LPSs could grow just by moist processes (moisture and temperature advection and high humidity) and even without barotropic or baroclinic instabilities. The moisture supply at midlevels has been shown to enhance the vertical development in tropical convection (Bretherton et al., 2004; Holloway & Neelin, 2009). Free tropospheric moisture plays a significant role in relation between column water vapor and the transition to sustained deep convection in the tropics (Holloway & Neelin, 2009). High moisture in the free atmosphere results in higher plume buoyancies and forms conditions favorable for deep convection. The SCVs provide deep inflow of moisture flux, which helps in sustaining convection in the southwestern sector of  LPSs.

The moisture budget can be analyzed by moisture transport and convergence. The column integrated moisture transport (MT) is given by

where Ps and Pa are surface and top of atmosphere pressure, respectively, g gravitational acceleration, q specific humidity, and V horizontal velocity. The vertical integral of moisture flux divergence (VMFD) is obtained by taking time integral of the horizontal divergence of equation 2. In this study, we use the VMFD output from ERA-Interim, which was calculated by the reanalysis model.

The Figures 3b and 3c show the VMFD (shading) and MT (vectors) for LPS-Lg and LPS-noLg, respectively. In case of LPS-Lg, three main locations of moisture convergence are observed. One is to the southwest of the SCV, while the second is on the western side of the LPS and the third is to the north of LPSs center. The moisture convergence on the southwest of SCV results from the interaction of an SCV with the moisture flux by LLJ. The region of moisture convergence in the western sector of LPSs results from interaction of LPSs circulation with LLJ. Note that the westerly circulation on the southern flank of SCV enhances the strength of LLJ and in turn the moisture transport from the Arabian Sea. The eastern center forms by easterly moisture flux by the northern branch of LPSs. Since the moisture supply is mainly in the southern part of the organized convergence zone (Figure 2c), it experiences LEREs, while the northern part of convergence zone misses them (Figure S6). In case of LPS-noLg, the west coast moisture convergence zone is absent and the supply of moisture by both the Arabian Sea and the BoB is less compared to LEREs. The above analysis reveals that the moisture transport from the Arabian Sea to central India increases in the presence of an  SCV.

3.5 Propagation Speed of LPSs

The average propagation speed of LPSs observed during the study period is 5 m s−1. In earlier studies, the propagation speed of MDs is reported as 5° longitude day−1, that is, 6 m s−1 (Krishnamurti et al., 1975). From the distribution of velocity, it is clear that LPS-Lg tend to be slightly slower than the LPS-noLg (Figure S7). Around 67% of LPS-Lg have velocities lower than the average velocity (< 5 m s−1) along their track. The CDFs of velocities of LPS-Lg and LPS-noLg differ significantly using the KS test (p value <  0.06). The speed of convective system affects the rainfall duration and in turn the accumulation of rainfall over the location (Doswell III et al., 1996). It is often observed that slower convective systems are more likely to give extreme precipitation (Doswell III et al., 1996; Maddox et al., 1978; Schumacher & Johnson, 2009). The presence of the SCV hinders the westward propagation of LPS, which results in increased accumulation of rainfall at the same place.

4 Summary

This analysis reveals that it is not only the intensity of LPSs but also the presence of SCV that determines whether LPSs could lead to LEREs. Over India, the latitudinal belt of 15–25°N is the most favorable zone for the LEREs to occur. This region has frequent occurrences of synoptic systems on the western and eastern sides of mainland India. It is also accompanied by the LLJ and climatological monsoon trough on the southern and northern flanks respectively. This unique meteorological setting forms a favorable environment for LEREs. The simultaneous presence of an SCV helps an LPS by the following means to give an LERE (Figure 4).
  • 1.

    Midtropospheric vortex. The interaction of the SCV and LPS circulation form a midtropospheric vortex, which is known to enhance the lifetime of MCSs and organize the convection.

  • 2.

    Dynamic lifting. The presence of an SCV increases the area of dynamic lifting on the western flank of the LPSs and leads to widespread ascent at midlevels.

  • 3.

    Static instability. Convection associated with the SCV provides additional static instability that could enhance the intensity of these events.

  • 4.

    Moisture supply. The SCV enhances the deep layer moisture supply from the Arabian Sea that helps in sustaining deep convection.

  • 5.

    Organization at low level. Large-scale low-level organized convergence forms in the region between the SCV and  LPS.

  • 6.

    LPS translation speed. The presence of the SCV on the western flank of the LPS slows down its westward propagation speed, which results in more accumulation of rainfall at the same location.

Details are in the caption following the image
Schematic explaining the mechanism of LEREs. The interaction of an LPS and an SCV forms conditions favorable for long-lived, organized, and slow-moving convective systems on the western flank of the LPS, which result in LEREs. The numbers from 1 to 6 in the figure are representative of terms, namely, midtropospheric vortex, dynamic lifting, static instability, moisture supply, an organization at the low level, and LPS translation speed, respectively. These terms are explained in the summary section.

These factors provide favorable conditions to form long-lived, organized, slow-moving convective systems that lead to LEREs. Our analysis could prove useful to understand the rising trend of precipitation extremes over central India, which has remained a puzzle. It gives a hint for how it is possible to get an increasing trend of LEREs in spite of an observed decreasing trend in stronger LPSs (Dash et al., 2004; Vishnu et al., 2016). We give an example of how synoptic systems could remotely influence EREs. For example, we show that synoptic systems of the west coast of India (MTCs or LPSs) can influence rainfall extremes over central and eastern states of India. Previous studies have noted the temporal and spatial clustering of synoptic activity during the active phase of monsoon (Goswami et al., 2003; Murakami et al., 1984). So, the predictability of LEREs could be pursued further by exploring the modulation of synoptic systems by monsoon intraseasonal oscillations, tropical waves, and Madden Julian oscillation. We recommend that a combined index that considers the simultaneous presence of multiple synoptic systems would prove more useful in the forecasting of widespread heavy rainfall events.


A. C. and G. S. B. acknowledge funding from the DST, MoES and MoEF, Government of India. D. M. W. F. is supported by NSF Grant AGS-1665247. A. C. N. acknowledges support from MHRD, USIEF, India and IIE Grant E0610103. This work benefited from discussions with Professor M. Wallace, C. Jalihal, S. Paleri, P. Kushwah, and Dr. J. Phadtare. We thank Professor Christian Dominguez-Sarmiento and an anonymous reviewer for their useful comments.

    Data Availability Statement

    The rainfall data used in the study are obtained from the IMD (https://imdpune.gov.in/ndc_new/Request.html). The global monsoon LPSs track data set is available online (https://worldmonsoons.org/global-monsoon-disturbance-track-dataset/). The ERA-interim data set is available online (https://apps.ecmwf.int/datasets/data/interim-full-daily/).