Volume 35, Issue 2
Planets
Free Access

Titan's inventory of organic surface materials

Ralph D. Lorenz,

Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Karl L. Mitchell,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Randolph L. Kirk,

U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Alexander G. Hayes,

Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Oded Aharonson,

Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Howard A. Zebker,

Departments of Geophysics and Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Phillipe Paillou,

UMR 5804, Laboratorie d'Astrophysique de Bordeaux, Observatorie Aquitain des Sciences de l'Univers, Floirac, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jani Radebaugh,

Department of Geological Sciences, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan I. Lunine,

Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Michael A. Janssen,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Stephen D. Wall,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Rosaly M. Lopes,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bryan Stiles,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Ostro,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Giuseppe Mitri,

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Ellen R. Stofan,

Proxemy Research, Rectortown, Virginia, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 January 2008
Citations: 159

Abstract

[1] Cassini RADAR observations now permit an initial assessment of the inventory of two classes, presumed to be organic, of Titan surface materials: polar lake liquids and equatorial dune sands. Several hundred lakes or seas have been observed, of which dozens are each estimated to contain more hydrocarbon liquid than the entire known oil and gas reserves on Earth. Dark dunes cover some 20% of Titan's surface, and comprise a volume of material several hundred times larger than Earth's coal reserves. Overall, however, the identified surface inventories (>3 × 104 km3 of liquid, and >2 × 105 km3 of dune sands) are small compared with estimated photochemical production on Titan over the age of the solar system. The sand volume is too large to be accounted for simply by erosion in observed river channels or ejecta from observed impact craters. The lakes are adequate in extent to buffer atmospheric methane against photolysis in the short term, but do not contain enough methane to sustain the atmosphere over geologic time. Unless frequent resupply from the interior buffers this greenhouse gas at exactly the right rate, dramatic climate change on Titan is likely in its past, present and future.

1. Introduction

[2] It has been long realized [e.g., Hunten, 1974] that thick deposits of photochemical materials may have accumulated on Titan's surface. Prior to the arrival of Cassini-Huygens, some 20 different organic molecules had been identified in Titan's atmosphere [e.g., Lorenz and Mitton, 2002], but the composition and extent of surface deposits was unknown. In this paper we report an assessment of the volume of liquid and solid organic materials from radar imaging data over ∼20% of Titan's surface.

[3] Two principal surface carbon reservoirs are considered: lakes and dunes. There may be considerable deposits of other organic materials, for example in Titan's midlatitudes where neither of these feature types are seen, and indeed global measurements of Titan's dielectric constant [Elachi et al., 2005] suggest that porous and/or organic materials make up much of the surface. This interpretation is not unique, nor can we assess any potential subsurface reservoirs such as an aquifer system that may hydraulically connect the lakes. We restrict the present analysis to areas where we can make morphological identification of aeolian sediment and liquids in lakes. Compositions have not been measured directly, but can be inferred to be predominantly carbon-bearing as follows.

[4] Only methane, ethane and propane are liquids at Titan's surface conditions, but propane is produced in photochemical models only 1/40th as abundantly as ethane [e.g., Yung and DeMore, 1999]. Some organic solids may be dissolved as traces [Raulin, 1987] up to a few per cent and in equilibrium with the atmosphere about 5% dissolved nitrogen is present, but for brevity we consider the lakes as an ethane/methane mix.

[5] The dune sand is known to be radar-dark, as well as dark at near-infrared window wavelengths between 0.94 and 5 microns since the radar-determined sand seas correspond [Lorenz et al., 2006a] to regions seen to be dark in near-infrared ground-based observations and dunes were seen in Huygens images [Soderblom et al., 2007]. These factors suggest, but do not prove, an organic component, such as the photochemical ‘tholin’ material produced in laboratory simulations, rather than pure water ice.

2. Lakes

[6] Although a surface reservoir of hydrocarbon liquids was long expected on Titan, convincing evidence for such liquids was not found until radar imaging covered high latitude areas [Stofan et al., 2007]. Above 55°N, radar observations have now (through T30 – May 2007) covered 55.4% of the terrain: of this, some 10% (∼400,000 km2, or 0.5% of Titan's surface) is identified as covered by lakes or seas; see Figure 1. A variety of lake morphologies imply diverse formation mechanisms that may include terrain flooding and karst dissolution (K. L. Mitchell et al., Titan's north polar lake district: Insights from the Cassini Titan RADAR mapper, manuscript in preparation, 2007). Features range in size from a few kilometers (the smallest recognizable in our best data of ∼300 m/pixel) to several hundred km. The combination of low radar reflectivity and high microwave emissivity plus the feature morphology and association with channels together point to present-day liquid.

image
A map of Titan's north polar region (5 degree latitude circles) with areas identified as lakes shown as dark grey against the radar swaths in white. Light grey areas have not been imaged by radar as yet.

[7] To determine the lake depth we use terrestrial analogs as a guide. A brief survey of terrestrial lakes (see Figure 2) indicates that a convenient and reasonably effective estimate is that a lake has an aspect ratio of 1/1000 (i.e. the average depth d = 0.0010 X, where the lake area is X^2, or equivalently its depth in meters equals the size in kilometers.) A least-squares linear fit to the world's 20 largest lakes yields d = 0.0015 X + 66. In practice, the diverse lake formation settings - from deep rift, fault or glacial lakes to shallow playas - lead to variations of an order of magnitude about these values. A survey (A. G. Hayes et al., Titan's lake distribution and classification from the Cassini RADAR, manuscript in preparation, 2007; see also Figure 1) of the Titan lakes indicates a median area of 100km2, and thus a depth of ∼10 m and a volume of 1 km3. However, a ‘similar-shape’ model like this will find the liquid volume dominated by the largest lake - so far the largest lake or sea imaged is a 400 × 200 km (80,000 km2) section of what is presumably a rather larger (as yet unnamed) feature at 70°N, 315°W, which would correspondingly be ∼300 m deep, or have a total volume of some ∼25,000 km3, even without allowing for unobserved areas of this feature (which near-infrared imaging shows to be part of a large, irregular optically-dark feature with an area of some 340,000 km2 [Turtle et al., 2007]).

image
Lake size/depth correlation for the Earth's 20 largest lakes.

[8] Another metric is the height of nearby topography. Terrestrial examples suggest that average lake depth is often a factor of 10 less than the height of the highest nearby terrain, although again there are extremes (e.g., Lake Baikal, Earth's deepest lake at 1600 m, has mountains of ∼3400 m nearby, whereas the Great Salt Lake has a depth of only a few m but has nearby km-high mountains - i.e. the depth/terrain ratio can vary from about 2 to several hundred.) Altimetry and other data show that there is relief of ∼700 m or more in Titan's North polar lakeland terrain, as in a few other areas on Titan. Thus a characteristic depth of 70 m would be implied, in good agreement with the 10–300 m range suggested by area scaling above.

[9] A final, and completely independent, measure is radiometric. The darkest parts of some lakes, generally the largest ones, are ‘black holes’, offering no measurable radar return down to the instrument noise floor of ∼ −26 dB [Stofan et al., 2007]. This requires not only that the surface reflection be very small (consistent with a smooth surface of a low dielectric constant material, such as a liquid hydrocarbon surface unroughened by waves) but also requires that the liquid be deep and/or lossy enough to suppress a bottom reflection. Lake bottoms with sediment density increasing smoothly with depth could also suppress bottom reflections via gradient-index impedance matching: however, there are morphological indications such as dark channels incised in almost-as-dark lakes that suggest that at least in some places bottom reflections are seen. Assuming then that such lakebed features are being hidden in ‘black’ areas by column absorption, a minimum depth can be inferred: the lower the assumed loss tangent δ, the deeper the lake must be. Clean liquid hydrocarbons have δ ∼ 10−4 to 10−3 [Sen et al., 1992; Rodriguez et al., 2003] although suspended or dissolved polar molecules such as nitriles and small tholin particles could increase these values. A penetration depth (1/e one-way absorption - see e.g. similar calculations elsewhere in the Saturnian system [Ostro et al., 2006]) of λ/2πδ√ɛ, with λ the radar wavelength of 2.2 cm and ɛ the real part of the dielectric constant (∼2), would therefore be 2–20 m - lakes with nonzero reflectivity or visible lakebed features are therefore likely shallower than this range.

[10] In summary, several lines of evidence point towards smaller lakes on Titan (∼100 km2) having a depth of the order of 10 m, and the handful of large ‘seas’ having depths ten or more times greater. It is noteworthy, that dozens of Titan's lakes individually contain ∼200 km3 of liquid methane/ethane, an amount equal to the ∼130 billion tonnes of proven natural gas reserves on Earth. Indeed, Titan's total inventory of liquids exceeds terrestrial oil and gas reserves by a factor of several hundred (∼400–500 GT or ∼800–1000 km3 [Falkowski et al., 2000; BP, 2007].

[11] Taking a conservative average depth of 20 m, and a total lake area of ∼400,000 km2 gives an observed inventory of some 8000 km3, although if the larger lakes or seas have larger depths, an inventory of the order of 5–10 times this is likely. This is the inventory that has been directly observed by radar to date. If we make the assumption that the unobserved 45% of terrain north of 55°N has a similar coverage, we double the inventory. A further doubling arises if we assume that southern polar areas have a similar inventory to the North, leading to a likely inventory of 3 × 104–3 × 105 km3 of liquid. Radar imaging of the southern polar region is planned for Cassini's extended mission, but a lake-shaped, optically-dark region [Turtle et al., 2007] is already known (Ontario Lacus, area ∼40,000 km2).

3. Dunes

[12] Some 40% of Titan's equatorial areas (up to 30° latitude) are covered in 1–2 km wide longitudinal sand dunes [Lorenz et al., 2006a; Radebaugh et al., 2007], correlating with areas seen to have a distinct dark near-infrared spectral type [e.g., Soderblom et al., 2007], although very few are found poleward of 30°. As on Earth, a range of dune size and interdune sand depth is observed. First, when the radar illumination is broadside-on to large dunes and interdune sand is thick enough that the intrinsic radar albedo of the surface is uniform, topographic shading is the major contributor to brightness variation in the scene. This permits a radarclinometric estimate of dune height of the largest dunes of ∼150 m [Lorenz et al., 2006a]. The typical dune width to interdune distance ratio is 1–4, so we can assign an area-average sand dune thickness (assuming a triangular cross-section with height) of 15–50 m. To this must be added the thickness of sand in the interdune areas, estimated below as ∼5 m, and thus we adopt a typical area-averaged sand thickness for thick-sand areas of 30 m.

[13] More typically, with off-broadside observations, smaller dune height and especially with thinner interdune sand, the duneform is seen only as a dark streak, against a brighter exposed or thinly-covered interdune background (as for many radar observations of dunes on Earth). In these cases, radarclinometric measurement of height is impossible. However, field data of Earth dunes show [Lancaster, 1995] that longitudinal dunes have height:width of 0.01–0.2, implying Titan dune heights of 10–400 m (similar heights result from considering the height:spacing ratios).

[14] We can also apply a radiometric constraint, namely that the dunes appear dark against the bright interdune material by obscuring it. Rodriguez et al. [2003] determine loss tangent δ of tholin of between 0.001 and .05. The corresponding penetration depths as above (∼λ/10δ are 2 m and 0.04 m. Thus a minimum thickness of dark streaks (and dark interdune areas where topographic shading is seen) of a meter or so seems likely, although is in this case less constraining than the morphological similarity range of >10 m above. Again adopting a local dune coverage fraction of 20–50%, we therefore find an area-average sand thickness of 2–200 m and adopt 10 m as a working value.

[15] Assuming roughly equal areas of thick and thin sand (noting that particular resolution and viewing azimuth is needed to identify the former - although dark streaks are more commonly seen in data so far, better imagery of the same areas might show topographic shading), the sand seas (i.e. 40% of the half of Titan's surface that lies between ±30° latitude) have an average sand depth of 20 m, which corresponds to a to a total inventory of some 3.2 × 105 km3 of material. This corresponds to about 400 times the ∼900 billion tonnes of proven coal reserves on Earth [BP, 2007], a material which has some superficial similarities with the likely dune sand on Titan. The figure above is perhaps more likely to underestimate the inventory than to overestimate it: a reasonable range is therefore 2–8 × 105 km3.

4. Discussion and Conclusions

[16] The results reported here must be considered preliminary, not least since they are based on only 20% coverage of Titan's surface, of which most is in the northern hemisphere and the equatorial regions. However, the hemispheres would have to be very different to give results that diverge widely from the estimates presented here. The inventory is substantial, exceeding in absolute terms the biospheric, oceanic and fossil fuel reservoirs on Earth; see Table 1. In terms of column abundance (mass/area) Titan's carbon inventory may approach Earth's non-carbonate reservoirs.

Table 1. Titan Carbon Inventory Compared With Other Planetary Reservoirsaa Indirectly-determined quantities shown in italics; expressed as volume of condensed species.
Reservoir Inventory (a), km3 Inventory, GT carbon Column Mass, kg/m2 Pressure, mbar
Titan
Methane in Atmosphere 800,000 360,000 4000 60
Ethane/Methane Lakes 30,000–300,000 16,000–160,000 2002000 330
Sand Dunes 200,000–800,000 160,000–640,000 2000–6400 40
Fine Impact Ejecta 400
Erosion from River channels 8000
Earth Carbon
Gas 140,bb Falkowski et al. [2000].
132cc BP [2007].
Oil 230,bb Falkowski et al. [2000].
356cc BP [2007].
Coal 3500,bb Falkowski et al. [2000].
900cc BP [2007].
Atmosphere 720 0.3
Biosphere 2000
Ocean 38,000
Lithosphere (Kerogens) 1.5 × 107
Lithosphere (Carbonates) 6 × 107
Earth Water
Atmosphere 20 2
Oceans 1.3 × 109 2.4 × 106 240,000
Lakes 125,000
Icecaps >3 × 107
Mars
Atmosphere 27,000 5900 150dd Read and Lewis [2004].
6
Seasonal Frost Caps 7000 1600 40dd Read and Lewis [2004].
1.5
Polar Layered Deposits 4000 900 23dd Read and Lewis [2004].
1
Permanent Polar Caps 900,000 200,000 5000dd Read and Lewis [2004].
,ee May be much less [see Byrne and Ingersoll, 2003].
185
Regolith 180,000 40,000 1000dd Read and Lewis [2004].
37
Venus
Atmosphere 5.8 × 108 1.25 × 108 106 90,000

[17] The total inventory we measure is substantially smaller than the reservoir estimated to be produced throughout the age of the solar system if methane photoloysis were to have occurred continuously at its present rate. The apparent dearth of material (compared to these model predictions - a summary is given by Lorenz and Lunine [1996], of several hundred meters thickness, or ∼107–108 km3) may indicate one or more of four things. First, other undetected organic materials are present, but not morphologically distinct. It is commonly assumed on the basis of bulk cosmological abundance that Titan's bedrock is dominated by water ice, but the near-surface may in fact be dominated by organic material. Furthermore, even at the low latitudes dominated by arid landforms like dunes, the Huygens probe indicated that at least some surface materials are moistened by liquid methane [Lorenz et al., 2006b; Niemann et al., 2005] so some amount of liquid is present (perhaps in very large amounts) beyond the obvious lakeforms. Second, the photochemical models may not correctly predict the ultimate yields of surface deposits (c.f. the relative yields of solids and liquids - see next paragraph). Thirdly, photochemical production may have been interrupted for long periods in Titan's past if the delivery of methane to the surface was episodic and led to occasional methane depletion. The identification of cryovolcanic features on the surface [Sotin et al., 2005; Lopes et al., 2007] supports such a picture. A final more speculative possibility is that some process has destroyed or subducted the deposits, such that they no longer exist at the surface.

[18] Note that the volume of sand considerably exceeds the amount of sand-sized material produced in impact ejecta for the known craters. Applying the sediment productions of Lorenz et al. [1995] for the known Titan craters yields only ∼500 km3 of mm-sized material. It is possible that the larger volumes of bigger ejecta particles could have been broken down into sand by other processes. The observed river channels, covering perhaps 0.1% of the surface and having incision depths of 100 m or less, are only able to account for ∼104 km3 of material. In sum, geological processes cannot account simply for the large volume of sand-sized material on Titan, supporting a photochemical origin for much of it [Lorenz et al., 2006a].

[19] The uncertainty in lake volume compared to dune volume spans a liquid:solid ratio of 0.03-1. Allowing for half of the liquid to be methane (e.g., see the ocean:atmosphere equilibrium discussion by Lunine et al. [1983] and Lorenz et al. [1999]), solid materials must dominate over liquid ethane. This contrasts with the predictions of photochemical models which indicated a converse relationship, that acetylene and other solids would amount to less than a third of the amount of liquid ethane (e.g. the acetylene:ethane production in three models reviewed by Lorenz and Lunine [1996] ranged from 0.2 to 0.8). Unless strong assumptions are made about the relative amounts of unobserved material such as subsurface ethane aquifers, models of photochemical production (and perhaps subsequent chemical processing in lakes) need to explain the predominance of solid materials. We note in this context that a major surprise from Cassini has been the complexity of the organic species formed, even in the ionosphere. Benzene has been detected in some abundance even at 1000 km altitude and some polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) like anthracene and its derivatives have been inferred [Waite et al., 2007]. This unexpectedly rapid synthesis of heavy (solid) organics may be the reason there is more sand than liquid.

[20] Finally, the liquid inventory, while extending over a large enough area to permit evaporative fluxes to match photochemical depletion on short timescales [Mitri et al., 2007], is not enough in volume terms to sustain the concentration of this greenhouse gas in the atmosphere on geological timescales. Put another way, there is an order of magnitude less liquid in the lakes than there is methane in the atmosphere, and photochemical models predict that inventory to be depleted in ∼10 Myr. This makes the present climatic situation somewhat precarious - the observed surface reservoir, even if mostly methane, is unable to buffer the atmospheric methane for long, and unless volcanic resupply matches methane loss at just the right rate, significant climate change is likely in the future and by implication in the past [Lorenz et al., 1997, 1999]. Stronger volcanic fluxes of methane might lead to wetter conditions, perhaps producing flood features that cannot be readily explained in the present climate. Periods without resupply might lead initially to conditions dryer than present, but then (as the greenhouse warming of methane is lost) cooling and condensation of some of the nitrogen atmosphere onto the surface - a partial collapse [Lorenz et al., 1997].

[21] The apparent ocean-atmosphere equilibrium is very different on Earth, where the condensable greenhouse gas (water) in the air has a global equivalent depth of only ∼2 cm, tiny compared to the ∼2.4 km global average depth of its surface reservoir. The situation on Mars may be intermediate (Table 1) - if the permanent polar caps and regolith contain tens of times the atmospheric inventory of CO2 [Read and Lewis, 2004], but recent work [e.g., Byrne and Ingersoll, 2003] suggests the caps have only a veneer of a few m of CO2 ice, making Mars rather like Titan from a volatile inventory perspective. On Titan, if the liquid in the lakes participates in a seasonal cycle [e.g., Stevenson and Potter, 1986; Mitri et al., 2007], it has only a small influence on the overall meteorology and climate, since the liquid inventory (∼200 kgm−2, or 3 mbar or perhaps a few times higher than this) is small compared with the ∼60 mbar of methane in the atmosphere, in contrast to the ∼30% Mars seasonal pressure cycle. Further study would be needed to consider how the methane reservoir could influence seasonal changes in cloud patterns [e.g., Mitchell et al., 2006; Rannou et al., 2006].

[22] Future Cassini observations will help make a more complete inventory, notably in the Southern hemisphere, and indications of surface composition from near-infrared spectroscopy will be useful to understand the chemical species involved in the global carbon cycles. Indirectly, the changing patterns of methane clouds on Titan, especially in the equinox period 2009–2011 during Cassini's proposed extended mission may show the participation of surface methane moisture in the climate system. Beyond this, important goals for a possible future mission might be to assess sediment and liquid depths directly with ground-penetrating radar, and to search in-situ for isotopic and other indications of chemical processing and volatile release from the interior.

Acknowledgments

[23] This work was supported by the Cassini Project, managed by the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, under a contract with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Cassini is a joint project of NASA, the European Space Agency (ESA) and the Italian Space Agency (ASI). We thank our colleagues on Cassini, and in particular the RADAR team, for making this work possible.