High‐Pressure Granulite Facies Overprinting During the Exhumation of Eclogites in the Bangong‐Nujiang Suture Zone, Central Tibet: Link to Flat‐Slab Subduction
Abstract
The geometric transformation of a descending plate, such as from steep to flat subduction in response to a change from normal to overthickened oceanic crust during subduction, is a common and important geological process at modern or fossil convergent margins. However, the links between this process and the metamorphic evolution of the exhumation of oceanic (ultra)high‐pressure eclogites are poorly understood. Here we report detailed petrological, mineralogical, phase equilibria, and secondary ion mass spectrometry zircon and rutile U‐Pb age data for the Dong Co eclogites at the western segment of the Bangong‐Nujiang suture zone, central Tibet. Our data reveal that the Dong Co eclogites experienced peak eclogite‐facies metamorphism (T = 610–630°C, P = 2.4–2.6 GPa) and underwent multiple stages of retrograde metamorphism. P ‐T pseudosections and compositional isopleths of garnet define a complex clockwise P ‐T ‐t path (including two stages of decompression‐dominated P ‐T path and one of isobaric heating), suggesting varying exhumation velocities. Combining previous studies with our new results, we suggest that the transformation from rapid to slow exhumation is dominated by the transition from steep to flat subduction. The flat‐slab segment, caused by subduction of buoyant oceanic plateau, led to an extremely slow exhumation and a strong overprinting of HP granulite facies at a depth of ~50 km at ~177 Ma. The slab rollback that followed in response to a substantial density increase of the eclogitized oceanic plateau resulted in another rapid exhumation process at ~168 Ma and triggered the formation of abundant near‐simultaneous or later magmatic rocks.
1 Introduction
High‐ultrahigh pressure (HP‐UHP) rocks (e.g., eclogites) from worldwide metamorphic terranes provide robust evidence that the continental/oceanic crust can be dragged to more than 100 km depths and later be brought back to the Earth surface during the collision and/or convergent process (e.g., Agard et al., 2009; Chopin, 2003; Liou et al., 2004). Studies on the mechanisms, velocities, and dynamic processes for the exhumations of HP‐UHP rocks can bring invaluable insights into plate tectonics and deep Earth processes (Agard et al., 2009; Cooper et al., 2011; Guillot et al., 2009; Hacker & Gerya, 2013; Kylander‐Clark et al., 2009; Warren, 2013). Over the past 30 years, many studies focused on continental HP‐UHP rocks (e.g., Burov et al., 2001; Ellis et al., 1999; Ernst, 2001), whereas oceanic eclogites received little attention. Different from the more buoyant continental crust, denser oceanic UHP eclogites are irreversibly buried, with only a few occasionally exhumed during specific time windows with the help of low‐viscosity materials (e.g., serpentinite and sediment) after their decoupling from the subducting slab (e.g., Agard et al., 2009; Gerya et al., 2002).
Numerical modeling and geophysical studies suggest that the subduction of overthickened oceanic crust (aseismic ridges, oceanic plateaus, or seamount chains) could make the slab dip shallowly or even horizontally, resulting in a flat subduction (e.g., Gutscher, Spakman, et al., 2000; van Hunen et al., 2002). In fact, flat subduction occurs at about 10% of the world's convergent margins (Gutscher, Spakman, et al., 2000) and the alternation from steep to flat subduction should be a common geological process at modern or fossil convergent margins. Previous research reveals that flat subduction has broad implications for subduction zone evolution, magmatism flare‐up, continental crust growth, and intracontinental deformation (e.g., Bourdon et al., 2003; Gutscher, Spakman, et al., 2000; Gutscher, Maury, et al., 2000; Li & Li, 2007). To date, however, we know little about the relationship between flat‐slab subduction and metamorphic evolution during the exhumation of oceanic eclogites.
The Dong Co eclogites were recently discovered in the Southern Qiangtang Block, Central Tibet (Dong et al., 2016), which made it possible to significantly improve our understanding of the Tethys Oceanic evolution during the Mesozoic Era. Previous studies revealed the existence of residual omphacites within the strongly retrogressed Dong Co eclogites (Dong et al., 2016) and suggested that their protolith could be a fragment of the Late Permian Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys oceanic crust (Wang, Wang, Xu, et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). However, so far, their refined P ‐T paths, metamorphic ages, exhumation mechanisms, and tectonic significance are still enigmatic. Here we report in detail the petrological features, mineralogical data, multistage retrograde metamorphism, phase equilibria, and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) zircon and rutile U‐Pb ages for the Dong Co eclogites, which are then used to constrain the refined P ‐T ‐t paths and the metamorphic evolution history. Furthermore, our new results reveal a clear link between the HP granulite‐facies overprinting during the exhumation of eclogites and flat‐slab subduction.
2 Geological Setting and Field Occurrence
Tibet, located in Southwest China, is composed of several continental blocks (e.g., North Qiangtang, South Qiangtang, Lhasa, and Himalaya) (Figure 1a) that were progressively accreted to Asia as a result of the closure of the intervening Paleo‐Tethyan and Neo‐Tethyan oceans (Yin & Harrison, 2000; X. Z. Zhang et al., 2014). These continental blocks are separated by several significant suture zones, namely, the Jinsha (JSSZ), Longmu Co‐Shuanghu (LSSZ), Bangong‐Nujiang (BNSZ), and Yarlung Zangbo suture zones (IYZSZ) from north to south (Figure 1a). The BNSZ, extending east‐west for >2,000 km in central Tibet, separates the South Qiangtang Block to the north and the Lhasa Block to the south (Figure 1b) (Yin & Harrison, 2000; Zhu et al., 2013). It is mainly composed of extensive dismembered ophiolitic fragments, Jurassic turbidites, minor retrograded eclogites, and high‐pressure granulites (Figure 1b) (Dong et al., 2016; Wang, Wang, Chung, et al., 2015; Wang, Wang, Xu, et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2013, 2016). The ophiolites from the BNSZ, regarded as a crucial geological archive of the Bangong‐Nujiang Tethyan oceanic lithosphere, were formed mainly during the Early to Middle Jurassic (190–164 Ma) according to U‐Pb zircon dating (review from Wang, Wang, Chung, et al., 2015).

The eclogite samples from the Dong Co area are distributed in a ~1,500 m by ~400 m metamorphic belt (Figure 1c), occurring as blocks or lens‐shaped bodies of sizes varying from a few meters to tens of meters in diameter, and are in contact with the surrounding metamorphic greywackes, ultramafic rocks, and schists (Figures 2a and 2b). The Dong Co eclogites were first reported as “HP granulite” (Wang, Wang, Xu, et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015) due to their strong overprinting at HP granulite facies to amphibolite‐facies conditions. They were later identified as retrograded eclogites based on the discovery of minor residual omphacites (Dong et al., 2016). Here two omphacite‐bearing samples (TC01‐1 and TC01‐4) were selected (Table 1) for detailed petrological, mineralogical, and phase equilibria studies. In addition, the sample TC01‐1 was also selected for SIMS zircon and rutile U‐Pb analyses. All analytical results are presented in the supporting information and Tables 2-4. A more detailed discussion of the methodology can be found in the supporting information (Bach et al., 1994, 1996; Bézos & Humler, 2005; Byerly, 1980; Coggon & Holland, 2002; Diener & Powell, 2012; Holland & Powell, 1998, 2003; Huang et al., 2007; Li et al., 2011, 2013, 2009; Liu et al., 2008; Ludwig, 2003; Powell et al., 1998; Puchelt & Emmermann, 1983; Sláma et al., 2008; White et al., 2000, 2002, 2007; Whitehouse et al., 1997; Zhao et al., 2011).

| Sample | TC01‐1 | TC01‐4 |
|---|---|---|
| Mineral assemblage | Grt, Omp, Cpx, Pl, Rt, Qtz, Amp, Ep, Czo, Zo, Ttn, Ilm, Zr | Grt, Omp, Cpx, Pl, Rt, Qtz, Amp, Ep, Zo, Ttn, Ilm, Zr, Mag |
| Metamorphic Stages | ||
| M1: ECL | Omp1 + Grt1 | Omp1 + Grt1 |
| M2: ECL‐HG | Cpx2 + Pl2 | Cpx2 + Pl2 |
| M3: HG | Grt3 + Cpx3 + Pl3 + Rt3 + Qtz | Grt3 + Cpx3 + Pl3 + Rt3 ± Qtz |
| M4: HG‐AM | Cpx4 + Pl4 + Amp4 ± Ilm | Cpx4 + Pl4 + Amp4 + Ilm ± Mag |
| M5: AM | Amp5 + Pl5 + Ttn5 + Zo5 ± Qtz | Amp5 + Pl5 + Zo5 + Ttn5 |
| Whole‐rock composition (mol %) | SiO2 = 50.67, Al2O3 = 9.08, CaO = 14.23, MgO = 13.93, FeO = 8.53, K2O = 0.05, Na2O = 2.29, TiO2 = 0.62, O = 0.58 | SiO2 = 49.58, Al2O3 = 9.76, CaO = 14.27, MgO = 13.91, FeO = 8.72, K2O = 0.16, Na2O = 2.10, TiO2 = 0.91, O = 0.60 |
- Note . Grt: garnet, Omp: omphacite, Cpx: clinopyroxene, Amp: amphibole, Pl: plagioclase, Qtz: quartz, Ep: epidote, Czo: clinozoisite, Zo: zoisite, Ttn: titanite, Ilm: ilmenite, Zr: zircon, Mag: magnetite. All mineral abbreviations are from Whitney and Evans (2010). Subscript numbers denote the metamorphic stages (M1‐M5); ECL: eclogite facies; ECL‐HG: early decompression during post‐eclogite facies; HG: high‐pressure granulite facies; HG‐AM: late decompression during post‐HP granulite facies; AM: amphibolite facies.
| Spot # | U (ppm) | Th (ppm) | Th U | f 206aa f 206 is the proportion of common 206Pb in total measured 206Pb. (%) |
207Pb 206Pb | ±1σ (%) | 207Pb 235U | ±1σ (%) | 206Pb 238U | ±1σ (%) | t 207/235 (Ma) | ±1σ | t 206/238 (Ma) | ±1σ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 55 | 44 | 0.79 | 0.11 | 0.0529 | 2.59 | 0.280 | 3.06 | 0.0383 | 1.62 | 250.5 | 6.8 | 242.6 | 3.9 |
| 2 | 23 | 18 | 0.76 | 0.23 | 0.0554 | 4.72 | 0.306 | 5.01 | 0.0401 | 1.69 | 270.9 | 12.0 | 253.2 | 4.2 |
| 3 | 248 | 227 | 0.92 | 0.16 | 0.0512 | 1.18 | 0.275 | 1.97 | 0.0390 | 1.57 | 246.8 | 4.3 | 246.4 | 3.8 |
| 4 | 381 | 642 | 1.69 | 0.13 | 0.0509 | 1.11 | 0.280 | 1.87 | 0.0398 | 1.50 | 250.4 | 4.2 | 251.7 | 3.7 |
| 5 | 25 | 16 | 0.63 | 0.63 | 0.0505 | 5.30 | 0.285 | 5.52 | 0.0410 | 1.53 | 254.8 | 12.5 | 259.0 | 3.9 |
| 6 | 40 | 25 | 0.64 | 0.11 | 0.0536 | 2.59 | 0.298 | 3.21 | 0.0403 | 1.89 | 264.6 | 7.5 | 254.4 | 4.7 |
| 7 | 63 | 51 | 0.81 | 0.19 | 0.0499 | 2.21 | 0.269 | 2.67 | 0.0391 | 1.50 | 241.7 | 5.8 | 246.9 | 3.6 |
| 8 | 484 | 464 | 0.96 | 0.09 | 0.0512 | 1.02 | 0.274 | 2.05 | 0.0388 | 1.78 | 245.9 | 4.5 | 245.6 | 4.3 |
| 9 | 265 | 258 | 0.97 | 55 | 0.0650 | 101 | 0.344 | 101 | 0.0383 | 2.67 | 299.9 | 234.1 | 242.4 | 6.4 |
| 10 | 664 | 760 | 1.14 | 0.05 | 0.0509 | 0.62 | 0.285 | 1.68 | 0.0407 | 1.56 | 254.9 | 3.8 | 257.0 | 3.9 |
| 11 | 479 | 479 | 1.00 | 0.08 | 0.0502 | 0.76 | 0.263 | 1.86 | 0.0380 | 1.70 | 237.3 | 3.9 | 240.5 | 4.0 |
| 12 | 450 | 405 | 0.90 | 0.24 | 0.0503 | 2.03 | 0.271 | 5.70 | 0.0392 | 5.32 | 243.9 | 12.4 | 247.6 | 12.9 |
| 13 | 41 | 30 | 0.73 | 0.13 | 0.0522 | 2.65 | 0.293 | 3.04 | 0.0407 | 1.50 | 260.8 | 7.0 | 257.4 | 3.8 |
| 14 | 399 | 410 | 1.03 | 0.02 | 0.0509 | 0.79 | 0.283 | 1.72 | 0.0403 | 1.53 | 253.0 | 3.9 | 254.7 | 3.8 |
| 15 | 1156 | 941 | 0.81 | 0.11 | 0.0500 | 0.89 | 0.188 | 1.84 | 0.0278 | 1.57 | 175.3 | 3.0 | 176.9 | 2.7 |
- a f 206 is the proportion of common 206Pb in total measured 206Pb.
3 Results
3.1 Petrography
The eclogite samples (TC01‐1 and TC01‐4) in this study are mainly composed of garnet (20–30 vol %), clinopyroxene (15–25 vol %), plagioclase (20–30 vol %), amphibole (20–40 vol %), quartz (<5 vol %), and minor or accessory minerals (e.g., rutile, titanite, ilmenite, and apatite) (Figure 2c). The residual omphacites occur as rare minerals with sizes of 2–20 μm and were found within the clinopyroxene + sodic plagioclase symplectic intergrowths (Figures 2d and 2e). Two basic types of garnets have also been identified in the Dong Co eclogites (TC01‐1 and TC01‐4): the small (<0.6 mm) Ca‐rich irregular garnet (GrtA, Type‐A garnet) and large (1–3 mm) Mg‐rich garnet porphyroblasts (GrtB, Type‐B garnet) (Figures 2c–2h), which is similar to many other granulitized eclogites in the world (e.g., granulitized eclogites from North Dabie Complex, Groppo et al., 2015). In addition, some clinopyroxenes (along with plagioclase and small GrtA grains) occur as small inclusions in GrtB porphyroblasts (Figures 2g and 2h), and amphibole + plagioclase ± ilmenite symplectites and coronas occur around these GrtB grains (Figure 2h). The transitional reactions from rutile to ilmenite and titanite have also been observed in some thin sections (Figure 2i). Based on these reaction textures, the mineral assemblages in five different metamorphic stages (denoted with subscripts 1–5) are summarized in Table 1, including (1) a relic of eclogite facies assemblage (M1); (2) clinopyroxene (augite) + sodic plagioclase (An < 30) symplectites (M2, early decompression during posteclogite facies); (3) high‐pressure granulite facies assemblage (M3); (4) amphibole + plagioclase ± ilmenite symplectites (M4, late decompression during post‐HP granulite facies); and (5) amphibolite facies metamorphic assemblage (M5).
3.1.1 Relic of Eclogite Facies Assemblage (M1)
Due to the strong overprinting at subsequent granulite‐facies conditions, much of the mineral and textural information concerning the early eclogite facies metamorphic history has been lost. The preserved eclogite facies assemblage has been recognized in only two samples (TC01‐1 and TC01‐4). They are represented by micron‐sized omphacite (Omp1) + core and mantle of GrtA grains (Grt1) within the symplectites of clinopyroxene (Cpx2) + sodic plagioclase (Pl2).
3.1.2 Clinopyroxene + Sodic Plagioclase Symplectites (M2)
3.1.3 High‐Pressure Granulite Facies Assemblage (M3)
High‐pressure granulites are generally accepted as containing distinct mineral assemblages of garnet + clinopyroxene + plagioclase + quartz, which are distinguished from eclogites by the existence of plagioclase and from medium pressure granulites by the lack of orthopyroxene (O'Brien & Rötzler, 2003; Zhao et al., 2001). The retrograded eclogite samples investigated in this study are dominated by coarse‐grained clinopyroxene (diopside, Cpx3), plagioclase (Pl3), quartz (Qtz3), and core and mantle of GrtB porphyroblasts (Grt3) in the matrix, which are consistent with the observations of previous works (Wang, Wang, Xu, et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2015). In addition, rutile is generally coexisting with the mineral assemblage of HP granulite facies in the matrix (Figure 2c) rather than that of eclogite facies as a residual symplectic mineral, thus indicating their formation at the HP granulite metamorphic stage (Cpx3 + Pl3 + Grt3 + Rt3 ± Qtz). In some samples, characteristic HP granulite mineral assemblages are found as small inclusions (e.g., clinopyroxene and plagioclase, Cpx3‐I + Pl3‐I) in the mantle of Grt3, which is similar to the Silurian high‐pressure granulites from Central Qiangtang (X. Z. Zhang et al., 2014). In summary, the retrograded eclogites are dominated by characteristic HP granulite mineral assemblages, which indicates a strong overprinting at HP granulite facies conditions following the early eclogite facies.
3.1.4 Amphibole + Plagioclase ± Ilmenite ± Magnetite Symplectites (M4)
3.1.5 Amphibolite Facies Metamorphic Assemblage (M5)
3.2 Mineral Major Elements
3.2.1 Garnet
Using elemental X‐ray maps (Figure 3) and compositional profiles (Figure 4), the two basic types of garnets (GrtA and GrtB) can be subdivided into at least five stages, including core of GrtA (Grt1‐C), mantle of GrtA (Grt1‐M), outermost rim of GrtA (diffusional re‐equilibration of Grt1 during early decompression process, M1 to M2), core and mantle of GrtB (Grt3), and outermost rim of GrtB (diffusional re‐equilibration of Grt3 during late decompression process, M3 to M4). These five stages of garnets have varying compositions and were probably formed and/or modified at different metamorphic stages (Figures 4 and 5a).



A representative GrtA from the sample TC01‐1, which has a complete core‐mantle‐rim structure, is shown in Figures 3a–3c. The Grt1‐C is characterized by the highest contents of grossular (30–34 mol %) and spessartine (3–5 mol %), and by the lowest pyrope content (19–24 mol %) and Mg# value [=100 × Mg/(Fe2+ + Mg)] (30–36). The Grt1‐M is characterized by moderate pyrope (24–30 mol %) and grossular (24–30 mol %) contents, higher Mg# (35–40), and lower spessartine (2–3 mol %) (Figure 4a). The X‐ray maps and a compositional profile reveal an increase in both pyrope content and Mg# and a decrease in grossular and spessartine from Grt1‐C to Grt1‐M (Figures 3a–3c and 4a). The outermost rims of GrtA are in contact with Cpx2 + Pl2 symplectite (M2) and have probably been modified by diffusion and/or later metamorphic reactions. From mantle to outermost rim of GrtA, the pyrope content decreases while grossular content increases distinctly (Figures 4a and 4b). However, an irregular relict garnet with a complete core‐mantle‐rim structure is very rare and is only found in the sample TC01‐1. In most cases (e.g., sample TC01‐4), these irregular relict garnets only retain one or two generational fragments of mineral information during its growth (most of them have compositions similar to mantle and rim of GrtA) (Figure 4b).
The Grt3 grains consist mainly of pyrope (35–38 mol %), almandine (39–43 mol %), and grossular (20–23 mol %), with minor spessartine (~1 mol %) (Figures 4c, 4d, and 5a). They are distinguished from GrtA by their homogeneous composition (Figures 3d–3f), lower spessartine content, and higher pyrope content and Mg# value (45–49). By comparison, the outermost rims of GrtB are in contact with symplectites or coronas of Amp4 + Pl4 ± Ilm4 ± Mag4 (M4) and have lower pyrope (29–35 mol %) content and Mg# (38–45) value (Figures 4c and 4d).
3.2.2 Clinopyroxene
The representative clinopyroxenes (Omp1, Cpx2, and Cpx3/Cpx3‐I) of different stages from the Dong Co eclogites have been analyzed and the results are listed in Table S2. The residual Omp1 grains contain 3.26–5.29 wt % Na2O and significant amounts of the jadeite (Jd, 23–36 mol %) component and are plotted in the typical omphacite field (Figure 5b). Meanwhile, it is worth noting that they are also distinguished by the appearance of Ca‐Eskola (Ca0.5□0.5AlSi2O6, where □ is a vacancy at the M2 site) (1–23 mol %) (Table S2), which is very similar to the typical supersilicic omphacites from the eclogite xenoliths in kimberlites (Smyth, 1980) and the diamond‐bearing UHP rocks in the Kokchetav massif (Katayama et al., 2000), suggesting the possibility of UHP metamorphism. Compared to the residual Omps, Cpx2 (augite) grains from symplectites contain lower jadeite (Jd = 2–17 mol %) and have negligible Ca‐Eskola component (0–2 mol %) (Figure 5c). In contrast, the Cpx3 and Cpx3‐I (diopside) grains contain the highest CaO (20.06–23.58 wt %) but the lowest Al2O3 (4.71–8.13 wt %) contents, with minor jadeite (3–7 mol %) (Figure 5c and Table S2).
3.2.3 Plagioclase
Representative plagioclase analyses, which are given in Table S3, include symplectic Pl2 and Pl4, matrix‐type Pl3 and Pl5, and inclusion plagioclases (Pl3‐I). One remarkable feature of symplectic plagioclase is that the Pl2 has the highest Ab (mol %) content (77–93), while the Pl4 exhibits the highest An (mol %) content (68–85) (Table S3). Such differences suggest that the compositions of Pl2 and Pl4 are largely dependent on the breakdowns of omphacite (jadeite component, Na‐rich) and garnet (grossular component, Ca‐rich), respectively. Moreover, the Pl3 and Pl3‐I plagioclases from the HP granulite facies have moderate An component (45–52), which are slightly lower than those formed in the amphibolite facies (Pl5) metamorphic stage (An = 57–64).
3.2.4 Amphibole
All the amphiboles in the Dong Co eclogites were formed during late retrograde metamorphism, including symplectic amphibole (Amp4) and matrix‐type Amp5. Based on the nomenclature of Leake et al. (1997), the Amp4 are pargasite to edenite (Figure 5d), with TSi = 6.30–6.55, (Na + K)A > 0.5, Ti < 0.5, AlVI > Fe3+, and Mg# = 51–64. In contrast, all the Amp5 are magnesiohornblende (Figure 5e) and are distinguished by TSi = 6.90–7.25, (Na + K)A < 0.5, and Mg# = 70–77 (Table S4).
3.2.5 Other Minerals
Epidote‐group minerals in the Dong Co eclogites include epidote, clinozoisite, and zoisite. Epidote and clinozoisite occur as small inclusions in mantle or rim of GrtA and contain high FeOT (5.26–8.72 wt %) but low Al2O3 (26.55–28.30 wt %). Zoisite, by contrast, occurs as small grains in the matrix (usually in equilibrium with Amp5) and is characterized by very high Al2O3 (31.71–31.84 wt %).
In addition, representative rutile, ilmenite, and titanite have also been analyzed and the data are given in Table S5.
3.3 SIMS Zircon and Rutile U‐Pb Dating
A representative eclogite sample (TC01‐1) was selected for SIMS zircon and rutile U‐Pb analyses (Tables 2 and 3). Averaging 120–200 μm in length, the zircon grains are euhedral to subhedral, short prismatic to irregular in crystal shape, colorless, and mostly of magmatic origin with a broadly spaced zoning texture in cathodoluminescence (CL) images (Figure 6a). Some magmatic zircons, however, are surrounded by narrow (5–20 μm) moderate‐ to high‐luminescence metamorphic rims (Figure 6a). The magmatic zircon grains yield a similar weighted mean age of 250.7 ± 3.7 Ma (MSWD = 2.3). One analysis from the metamorphic rim of a zircon grain yields a 206Pb/238U age of 176.9 ± 2.7 Ma (Figure 6b).
| Spot | U (ppm) | ƒ206aa The percentage of common 206Pb in total 206Pb, calculated by 207Pb‐based. (%) |
238U/206Pb | ±б (%) | 207Pb/206Pb | ±б (%) | T 206/238bb The 206Pb/238U age calculated by 207Pb‐based common‐lead correction. (Ma) |
±б (%) (Ma) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC01‐01 | 1.6 | 6 | 35.7 | 5.9 | 0.099 | 16 | 167 | 10 |
| TC01‐02 | 1.6 | 2 | 33.3 | 5.0 | 0.075 | 8.5 | 185 | 9 |
| TC01‐03 | 2.5 | 3 | 36.5 | 4.1 | 0.070 | 8.2 | 170 | 7 |
| TC01‐04 | 3.3 | 2 | 34.9 | 9.3 | 0.061 | 9.2 | 180 | 17 |
| TC01‐05 | 3.8 | 2 | 35.4 | 6.5 | 0.057 | 8.7 | 178 | 12 |
| TC01‐06 | 2.8 | 3 | 37.5 | 4.5 | 0.071 | 10 | 165 | 8 |
| TC01‐07 | 2.2 | 3 | 36.8 | 7.3 | 0.062 | 12 | 170 | 12 |
| TC01‐08 | 3.9 | 1 | 38.6 | 7.3 | 0.065 | 9.9 | 162 | 12 |
| TC01‐09 | 5.3 | 1 | 37.6 | 3.7 | 0.061 | 7.2 | 167 | 6 |
| TC01‐10 | 2.9 | 2 | 37.6 | 4.0 | 0.063 | 4.1 | 166 | 7 |
| TC01‐11 | 2.9 | 2 | 37.9 | 5.3 | 0.065 | 11 | 164 | 9 |
| TC01‐12 | 5.2 | 1 | 36.4 | 5.0 | 0.054 | 3.4 | 174 | 9 |
| TC01‐13 | 2.5 | 2 | 39.4 | 7.2 | 0.075 | 5.1 | 156 | 11 |
| TC01‐14 | 1.8 | 10 | 31.8 | 6.1 | 0.130 | 11 | 179 | 12 |
| TC01‐15 | 1.4 | 3 | 38.4 | 4.2 | 0.085 | 16 | 158 | 7 |
| TC01‐16 | 1.1 | 5 | 37.8 | 8.4 | 0.109 | 9.3 | 156 | 13 |
| TC01‐17 | 4.9 | 1 | 38.3 | 3.6 | 0.052 | 7.4 | 165 | 6 |
| TC01‐18 | 2.1 | 24 | 29.7 | 6.8 | 0.237 | 9.2 | 163 | 13 |
| TC01‐19 | 4.3 | 1 | 39.6 | 5.0 | 0.063 | 2.0 | 158 | 8 |
- a The percentage of common 206Pb in total 206Pb, calculated by 207Pb‐based.
- b The 206Pb/238U age calculated by 207Pb‐based common‐lead correction.

The rutile grains analyzed in this study range from 120 to 420 μm in length (Figure 6c) and exhibit uranium contents varying from 1.1 to 5.3 ppm (Table 3). Regression of the data points on the Tera‐Wasserburg plot gives a lower intercept age of 167.6 ± 4.7 Ma (MSWD = 0.75, n = 19), which is consistent with the weighted mean 206Pb*/238U* age (207Pb‐based common‐lead correction age, Williams, 1998) of 166.7 ± 3.9 Ma (MSWD = 0.67, n = 19) within errors (Table 3 and Figure 6d).
4 Discussion
4.1 P ‐T Estimates for Dong Co Eclogites
4.1.1 Eclogite Facies (M1)
To estimate the P ‐T conditions of the Dong Co eclogites at different metamorphic stages, P ‐T pseudosections were calculated for the omphacite‐bearing samples TC01‐1 and TC01‐4 using the software THERMOLCALC 3.33 (Figure 7) and the whole‐rock composition of TC01‐1 and TC01‐4 are given in Table 1 and supporting information. In addition, modeled compositional isopleths of garnet (Xprp, Xgrs, and XMg) have been used to constrain the P ‐T conditions (Figures S1 and S2). The measured compositions of the Grt1‐C and Grt1‐M from sample TC01‐1 in equilibrium with omphacites yield conditions of P = ~1.9 GPa, T = ~620°C, and P = 2.4–2.6 GPa, T = ~630°C (Figures S1a and S1b), respectively. The growth zone (core to mantle) of Grt1 defines a near‐isothermal compression path from prograde to peak metamorphism which suggests a rapid subduction process. The peak conditions (2.4–2.6 GPa, 610–630°C) estimated from the composition of Grt1‐M of samples TC01‐1 and TC01‐4 are in the stability field of garnet + omphacite + phengite + rutile + Na‐amphibole + lawsonite + quartz (Figures 7, S1b, and S2b). The HP/LT hydrous minerals, lawsonite, Na‐amphibole (e.g., glaucophane), and phengite, are highly unstable at high‐temperature conditions, and the preservation of these minerals require a rapid exhumation with substantial cooling (e.g., Clarke et al., 2006; Tsujimori et al., 2006; Wei & Clarke, 2011). Hence, the overprinting at HP granulite facies conditions (M3) may have erased the former HP/LT hydrous mineral relics and only minor micron‐sized omphacite + irregular garnet grains have been preserved in some retrograded eclogite samples (TC01‐1 and TC01‐4).

4.1.2 Early Decompression during Posteclogite Facies (M2)
The P ‐T conditions of Cpx2 + Pl2 symplectites after omphacite are difficult to quantitatively constrain because they reflect the attainment of local/domainal equilibrium rather than that of sample‐scale equilibrium. Instead, a rough evaluation of reasonable P ‐T range could be inferred by some mineral information and petrographic textures. The compositions of outermost rim of GrtA, which could be the result of the Grt1‐M being modified by early decompression, define a decompression‐dominated trend (i.e., variation of pressure is more significant than that of temperature) (Figures S1c and S2c), suggesting a rapid exhumation process. Based on the textures related to the breakdown of omphacite, this stage of rapid decompression would have lasted until the complete breakdown of omphacite (Omp‐out line) (red field in Figures S1a and S2a, P = 1.3–1.5 GPa, T = 720–780°C).
4.1.3 Overprinting of HP Granulite Facies Stage (M3)
The compositions of Grt3 yield a P ‐T range of 1.2–1.4 GPa and 910–930°C, which is in the stability field of garnet + clinopyroxene + plagioclase + rutile + amphibole + quartz ± biotite (Figures 7, S1d, and S2d) and nearly in accordance with the actual petrological observations. Biotite was not observed in our investigated samples maybe due to the following reasons: (1) negligible K2O (0.05–0.16 mol %) in whole‐rock composition (Table 1) lead to very low biotite content and (2) the P ‐T conditions of HP granulite facies, just reaching dehydration‐melting conditions for biotite (Vielzeuf & Montel, 1994), may have led to the breakdown of the former minor biotite. Although our result (Figure 7) and previous research (e.g., Tsunogae et al., 2003) suggest that some amphiboles (e.g., fluorine‐bearing pargasite) can remain stable under the granulite facies conditions (or even higher temperatures), the amphibole grains from M3 have not yet been identified probably due to their low amount and strong replacement of retrograde amphibole (Amp4–5).The P ‐T conditions and mineral assemblage coincide with those of characteristic HP granulite worldwide (Harley, 1989; O'Brien & Rötzler, 2003; X. Z. Zhang et al., 2014), suggesting an overprinting of high temperature metamorphism after the early rapid decompression (M2).
4.1.4 Late Decompression (M4) and the Following Amphibolite Facies (M5) Stages
The M4 assemblage (Amp4 + Pl4 ± Ilm4 ± Mag4), as a product of garnet breakdown, is widely developed in symplectites around the GrtB porphyroblasts, suggesting a rapid decompression process after the HP granulite facies stage (Harley, 1989; O'Brien & Rötzler, 2003; X. Z. Zhang et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2001). The P ‐T conditions (Figures S1d and S2d) yielded by the compositions of GrtB rim support a rapid decompression associated with cooling (Figure 7). According to the reaction textures, this decompression P ‐T path would pass through the transition field of rutile‐ilmenite‐titanite (P = 0.3–0.6 GPa; T = 720–770°C) (Figures S1a and S2a), which grew during the initial stage of amphibolite facies retrograde metamorphism (M5). Then the rocks would have further cooled down to T = ~600°C, P = ~0.3 GPa, according to the compositions of Pl5 (the minimum An = 57) (Figures S1a and S2a), which represent the P ‐T conditions of late stage amphibolite facies retrograde metamorphism (M5).
4.2 Zircon and Rutile U‐Pb Age and the Geological Significance
Most zircon grains from the Dong Co eclogites are characterized by broadly spaced zoning texture in CL images and high Th/U ratios, similar to those from gabbro/diabase in ophiolites (e.g., Wang, Wang, Chung, et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2016). Hence, the 206Pb/238U ages (mean age = ~250 Ma) obtained from these grains probably represent the time of crystallization for the protolith of the Dong Co eclogites, which is consistent with the results of previous laser ablation‐inductively coupled plasma‐mass spectrometry (LA‐ICP‐MS) zircon dating (~252 Ma, Wang, Wang, Xu, et al., 2015; ~260–242 Ma, Zhang et al., 2015). Considering the strong mid‐ocean ridge basalts (MORB) affinities of the Dong Co eclogites (Wang, Wang, Xu, et al., 2015), their protolith must have been part of the Late Permian to Early Triassic Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys oceanic crust. Meanwhile, the metamorphic rim of one zircon grain yields an Early Jurassic metamorphic age (~177 Ma). Based on available information, we suggest that the metamorphic rim of the zircon grain probably grew during the overprinting process of the HP granulite facies stage (M3) rather than during the eclogite facies stage (M1), for the following two reasons: (1) the U‐Pb age (~177 Ma) of this metamorphic rim is contemporary with the Early Jurassic HP granulite facies metamorphic event (~179 Ma) in the Amdo area located in the central BNSZ (Xie et al., 2013) and (2) if the metamorphic zircon rim (~177 Ma) would record the eclogite‐facies peak event (>80–90 km) and the rutile intercept age (~168 Ma, see below) reflect the timing of amphibolite facies (~15 km), the resulting exhumation rate (>4–5 mm/yr) of Dong Co eclogites would have been even faster than those of “cold eclogites” (e.g., Qiangtang eclogites, Zhai et al., 2011) which experienced a rapid exhumation with substantial cooling. This would be contradictory to the metamorphic evolution (slow exhumation and granulitization) of Dong Co eclogites.
Rutile in the Dong Co eclogites is predicted to be stable from the early HP‐UHP eclogite facies (M1) to the high‐pressure granulite facies (M3) stages (Figure 7). Thus, it is essential to determine at which metamorphic stage the rutile grew. The Zr‐in‐rutile thermometer (Zack et al., 2004; Watson et al., 2006; Tomkins et al., 2007) provides a good opportunity to establish a direct link between the metamorphic temperature and the history of rutile growth (e.g., Gao et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2011). The studied rutile has high but variable Zr contents (912–1,800 ppm, Table 4), which are distinctly higher than those of rutile formed at the HP‐UHP eclogite facies (<150 ppm) (Chen et al., 2013; Gao et al., 2014; Zheng et al., 2011) but similar to those of rutile formed at the granulite facies (Pauly et al., 2016) (Figure 8). Due to the very slow rate of Zr diffusion in rutile (Cherniak et al., 2007), the measured Zr concentrations in rutile could represent the approximate Zr concentrations during the growth process of rutile. The Zr‐in‐rutile temperatures were calculated using thermometers with pressure‐dependent calibration from Tomkins et al. (2007), and the results are listed in Table 4 and Figure 8. Combined with phase equilibrium modeling (Figure 7), the Zr‐in‐rutile temperatures of 740–850°C calculated at 1.0–1.5 GPa (Table 4) are consistent with the P ‐T evolution of the Dong Co eclogites, suggesting that the rutile was formed during the overprinting process of the HP granulite facies stage. This interpretation is also supported by the mineral occurrence of rutile (Figure 2c).
| Sc | V | Cr | Ni | Sr | Zr | Nb | Hf | Ta | Pb | Th | U | Nb/Ta | Zr/Hf | T 1.0 | T 1.5 | T 2.0 | T 2.5 | T 3.0 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TC01‐01 | 5.64 | 1065 | 676 | 0.19 | 1.38 | 944 | 774 | 19.1 | 31.7 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 0.67 | 24.4 | 49.4 | 751 | 777 | 804 | 831 | 858 |
| TC01‐02 | 5.68 | 1164 | 890 | 0.11 | 1.07 | 1053 | 875 | 21.6 | 35.3 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.57 | 24.8 | 48.9 | 761 | 788 | 815 | 842 | 869 |
| TC01‐03 | 4.78 | 1371 | 812 | 0.23 | 0.81 | 1487 | 541 | 38.6 | 28.9 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 1.20 | 18.7 | 38.5 | 796 | 824 | 852 | 880 | 908 |
| TC01‐04 | 6.41 | 975 | 553 | 0.29 | 1.08 | 1146 | 852 | 25.2 | 38.5 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 1.13 | 22.1 | 45.5 | 770 | 797 | 824 | 851 | 879 |
| TC01‐05 | 5.80 | 1147 | 597 | 0.14 | 1.14 | 1135 | 812 | 25.2 | 42.3 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 1.33 | 19.2 | 45.1 | 769 | 796 | 823 | 850 | 878 |
| TC01‐06 | 5.62 | 1044 | 2232 | 0.10 | 1.09 | 1040 | 587 | 21.1 | 20.9 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.69 | 28.1 | 49.2 | 760 | 787 | 814 | 841 | 868 |
| TC01‐07 | 5.12 | 1020 | 517 | 0.34 | 1.14 | 1053 | 1379 | 22.4 | 54.7 | 0.05 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 25.2 | 47.0 | 761 | 788 | 815 | 842 | 869 |
| TC01‐09 | 5.41 | 1331 | 811 | 0.16 | 0.78 | 1837 | 596 | 47.5 | 29.4 | 0.13 | 0.00 | 1.22 | 20.3 | 38.6 | 819 | 848 | 876 | 905 | 933 |
| TC01‐09 | 5.27 | 1017 | 303 | 0.22 | 1.01 | 1102 | 1158 | 22.3 | 70.1 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 16.5 | 49.5 | 766 | 793 | 820 | 847 | 874 |
| TC01‐10 | 6.65 | 1158 | 834 | 0.27 | 1.27 | 1032 | 628 | 23.9 | 26.3 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 23.9 | 43.1 | 759 | 786 | 813 | 840 | 867 |
| TC01‐11 | 4.68 | 820 | 793 | 2.01 | 1.32 | 1006 | 1036 | 19.7 | 33.4 | 2.41 | 0.02 | 1.63 | 31.0 | 51.1 | 757 | 784 | 811 | 838 | 864 |
| TC01‐12 | 5.75 | 890 | 491 | 0.05 | 1.12 | 1215 | 1173 | 27.7 | 54.5 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.75 | 21.5 | 43.9 | 776 | 803 | 830 | 858 | 885 |
| TC01‐13 | 5.40 | 1283 | 1868 | 0.22 | 1.08 | 959 | 417 | 19.7 | 13.2 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.93 | 31.5 | 48.6 | 752 | 779 | 806 | 833 | 859 |
| TC01‐14 | 4.46 | 1314 | 4167 | 0.13 | 1.04 | 984 | 655 | 20.3 | 22.3 | 0.04 | 0.00 | 1.04 | 29.4 | 48.4 | 755 | 781 | 808 | 835 | 862 |
| TC01‐15 | 4.02 | 1116 | 671 | 0.00 | 1.18 | 1236 | 945 | 28.5 | 56.4 | 0.06 | 0.00 | 1.48 | 16.8 | 43.4 | 777 | 805 | 832 | 860 | 887 |
| TC01‐16 | 5.24 | 1180 | 462 | 0.07 | 1.07 | 1055 | 1029 | 22.1 | 70.9 | 0.08 | 0.00 | 1.40 | 14.5 | 47.8 | 761 | 789 | 816 | 843 | 870 |
| TC01‐17 | 5.17 | 1010 | 364 | 0.06 | 1.11 | 1067 | 1067 | 22.8 | 67.5 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.80 | 15.8 | 46.9 | 763 | 790 | 817 | 844 | 871 |
| TC01‐18 | 5.74 | 1070 | 505 | 0.24 | 1.10 | 1132 | 662 | 24.4 | 33.2 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 1.44 | 20.0 | 46.3 | 768 | 796 | 823 | 850 | 877 |
| TC01‐19 | 5.59 | 1040 | 496 | 0.36 | 1.04 | 1076 | 622 | 22.9 | 28.8 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 1.61 | 21.6 | 47.0 | 763 | 791 | 818 | 845 | 872 |
| TC04‐1 | 5.23 | 1022 | 433 | 0.22 | 1.10 | 1052 | 1226 | 22.4 | 51.6 | 0.10 | 0.00 | 1.03 | 23.8 | 46.9 | 761 | 788 | 815 | 842 | 869 |
| TC04‐2 | 4.72 | 1214 | 364 | 0.34 | 1.13 | 1203 | 960 | 29.1 | 53.4 | 0.07 | 0.00 | 2.08 | 18.0 | 41.3 | 775 | 802 | 829 | 857 | 884 |
| TC04‐3 | 7.18 | 970 | 498 | 0.42 | 1.21 | 1004 | 820 | 20.3 | 40.3 | 9.33 | 0.01 | 1.17 | 20.4 | 49.4 | 757 | 784 | 810 | 837 | 864 |
| TC04‐4 | 5.52 | 1176 | 484 | 0.46 | 1.08 | 1162 | 559 | 27.5 | 39.9 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.34 | 14.0 | 42.3 | 771 | 798 | 826 | 853 | 880 |
| TC04‐5 | 5.85 | 988 | 544 | 0.19 | 1.69 | 979 | 710 | 20.6 | 31.4 | 0.03 | 0.44 | 0.64 | 22.6 | 47.5 | 754 | 781 | 808 | 835 | 862 |
| TC04‐6 | 5.81 | 989 | 612 | 0.34 | 1.73 | 975 | 585 | 22.4 | 36.0 | 0.07 | 0.01 | 0.77 | 16.2 | 43.5 | 754 | 781 | 807 | 834 | 861 |
| TC04‐7 | 5.50 | 863 | 583 | 0.35 | 1.02 | 912 | 554 | 19.9 | 22.7 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.77 | 24.4 | 45.8 | 747 | 774 | 801 | 827 | 854 |
- Note . T1.0, T1.5, T2.0, T2.5, and T3.0 denote the Zr‐in‐rutile temperatures (°C) at 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, and 3.0 GPa, respectively, calculated using the calibration of Tomkins et al. (2007).

Interpretation of rutile U‐Pb ages is also closely related to the U‐Pb closure temperature (T C), which is dependent on grain size and cooling rate (e.g., Cherniak, 2000; Gao et al., 2014). Experimental studies on lead diffusion suggested T C of ~600°C and >600°C for rutiles (~100 μm in size) under wet and dry conditions, respectively (Cherniak, 2000). Recently, average T C of 569 ± 24°C was obtained from rutile grains ranging from 120 to 270 μm (Kooijman et al., 2010). Considering that the analyzed rutile grains mostly range from 150 to 300 μm, the U‐Pb T C for rutile is likely higher, perhaps at about 600°C. The analyzed rutile grains were formed during the HP granulite facies stage with high Zr‐in‐rutile temperatures (740–850°C), significantly higher than their T C (~600°C). Therefore, the rutile U‐Pb age may reflect the timing when the rocks had cooled from the HP granulite temperature down to ~600°C during the late exhumation process, which should be very close to the timing of the late stage of amphibolite facies retrograde metamorphism (M5).
In summary, combining the published age of the HP granulite facies metamorphic event (~179 Ma) with our new results from zircon and rutile, we propose that the ~177 Ma zircon age could represent the timing of HP granulite facies overprinting stage, while the rutile lower intercept age of ~168 Ma could reflect the timing of the later stage of amphibolite facies retrograde metamorphism (M5).
4.3 P ‐T ‐t Path and Metamorphic Evolution History
The petrographic textures, mineral compositions, and P ‐T pseudosections of the Dong Co eclogites define a complex clockwise P ‐T ‐t path, including two sections of decompression‐dominated P ‐T path (M1 to M2 and M3 to M4) and one section of heating‐dominated P ‐T path (isobaric heating, M2 to M3) processes (Figures 7, S1, and S2). Because temperature variations of rocks need prolonged thermal conduction to spread, while pressure variations mainly depend on the depths, decompression‐dominated P ‐T paths are generally interpreted as related to rapid exhumation processes after the peak metamorphic conditions (e.g., Harley, 1989; O'Brien & Rötzler, 2003; X. Z. Zhang et al., 2014; Zhao et al., 2001). In contrast, isobaric heating P ‐T paths should reveal a slow exhumation which often resulted in HP granulitic overprinting, similar to what was described for the UHP eclogites from North Qaidam (Song et al., 2003). Therefore, the P ‐T ‐t path of the Dong Co eclogites reveal a complex metamorphic evolution history in response to a varying rate of the exhumation processes.
Previous research and our new results suggest that the Dong Co eclogites were part of the Late Permian Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys oceanic crust which experienced deep subduction (>~80 km) and probably underwent HP‐UHP metamorphism (M1). Because only minor or even trace amounts of early peak metamorphic minerals remain, the timing of the peak metamorphic stage (M1) is difficult to be determined and it can only be restricted to the period ~250–177 Ma based on our new zircon and rutile U‐Pb ages. After the peak metamorphic stage (M1), the Dong Co eclogites experienced a rapid exhumation process from >80 km to ~50 km, and the symplectites (Cpx2 + Pl2) were widely formed in response to the breakdown of omphacite in this stage. In addition, based on isomodes of garnet (mol %) (Figure 7), the garnets from Dong Co eclogites should have experienced a significant decomposition process due to the decrease of modal proportions from M1 (~15 mol %) to M2 (~8 mol %) (Figure 7), which is consistent with the observed irregular zoning and corroded appearance of GrtA (Figures 7, S1, and S2).
Then, the Dong Co eclogites experienced a slow exhumation which resulted in the strong overprinting at HP granulite facies stage (M3). The U‐Pb age of ~177 Ma yielded by the metamorphic rim of one zircon grain should be very close to the timing of the HP granulite facies stage (M3). Furthermore, the modeled garnet isomodes are also consistent with the observed growth of Mg‐rich garnet porphyroblasts during the granulitization process (M2 to M3) (Figures 7, S1, and S2). Subsequently, the Dong Co eclogites experienced another rapid exhumation process from ~50 km to ~15 km and underwent amphibolite facies retrogression (M5), which was restricted to ~168 Ma by the rutile lower intercept age.
5 Geodynamic Implications
Different from the eclogites and blueschists from other typical deeply subducted oceanic crust units (e.g., Zermatt‐Saas, Voltri Massif, and Western Himalaya), which generally experienced a simple rapid exhumation (e.g., Agard et al., 2009; Groppo et al., 2016), the Dong Co eclogites are distinguished by the appearance of a slow exhumation period. Although the HP‐granulitized eclogites from many other (U)HP terranes have generally been attributed to slow exhumations (O'Brien & Rötzler, 2003; Song et al., 2003), the mechanism is still unresolved. Considering that the closure of the Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys Ocean and the continental collision occurred during the Late Jurassic to Early Cretaceous or even later (e.g., Fan et al., 2015; Kapp et al., 2003), the Dong Co eclogites were demonstrably exhumed during oceanic convergence (such as Ecuador of Northern Andes, reviewed by Agard et al., 2009), which need three key steps: (1) eclogite slices/blocks were weakened and detached from the subducting oceanic slab by some mechanism(s) (e.g., Warren, 2013), such as dehydration embrittlement (e.g., Hacker et al., 2003) and/or localized melting (Andersen & Austrheim, 2006; Kanamori et al., 1994); (2) the buoyant material (e.g., serpentinite and sediment) within the subduction channel formed “upward directed channel flow” when their buoyancy exceeded subduction‐related traction (Hacker & Gerya, 2013; Warren, 2013); and (3) the detached slices/blocks were carried by the low‐viscosity materials flow and exhumed along the subduction channel due to buoyancy (Agard et al., 2009; Guillot et al., 2009; Hacker & Gerya, 2013; Warren, 2013). Because the direction of buoyancy (F b) is always vertically up, the effective buoyancy (F e) which drove the eclogites to exhume along the slab should be dependent largely on the dip angle (α ) (F e = F b sinα ). Therefore, the geometry of the slab (flat or steep subduction) would play a key role in the exhumation velocities of a buoyancy‐driven exhumation process. Combining regional geological observations with our results, we propose a new flat subduction model in response to the subduction of an overthickened oceanic crust which resulted in the sharp deceleration of exhumation and the overprinting at HP granulite metamorphic conditions.
According to our model, the Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys oceanic crust subducted northward beneath the Southern Qiangtang Block at a high/ normal dip angle during the early stage (~250–177 Ma) until the subduction of buoyant overthickened oceanic crust (oceanic plateaus, aseismic ridges, or seamount chains) (Figure 9a). This is strongly supported by the identification of widespread remnants of the Early Jurassic oceanic plateau within the Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys Ocean (K. J. Zhang et al., 2014). When arriving at the trench, the overthickened oceanic plateau substantially slowed down the subduction and increased the resistance, triggering the eclogite slices to be detached from the descending eclogitized slab (Figures 9a and 9b). Significant effective buoyancy resulting from a high dip angle drove the eclogite slices/blocks wrapped in low‐viscosity materials to return rapidly from a depth of >~80 km to that of ~50 km (Figure 9b). Subsequent subduction of positively buoyant oceanic plateau can lead the slab to dip more shallowly or even horizontally (Figure 9c) based on many numerical models and geophysical studies (e.g., Arrial & Billen, 2013; Gutscher, Spakman, et al., 2000; van Hunen et al., 2002). The very low dip angle can significantly decrease the effective buoyancy along the subducting slab. Therefore, the eclogite slices/blocks are exhumed more slowly or even underplated to the bottom of the overriding plate when they returned into the flat slab segment at a depth of ~50 km (Figures 9c and 9d). Due to the prolonged permanence at the hot crust‐mantle transition zone or at the base of thickened lower crust, sufficient thermal conduction heated up the Dong Co eclogites to ~900°C, resulting in their strong overprinting at HP granulite facies conditions at ~177 Ma. Meanwhile, the hypothesis of flat subduction at ~177 Ma is also supported by the simultaneous arc magmatic gaps at the western segments of the BNSZ and the Southern Qiangtang Block (reviewed by Zhu et al., 2013, 2016; Li et al., 2016). As the oceanic plateau was being dragged to depths of ~80–100 km or deeper, negative buoyancy in response to the transition from the oceanic plateau's crust to the eclogites led to a new steep subduction (e.g., Arrial & Billen, 2013). During the process, the Dong Co eclogites experienced another rapid exhumation process, returning from ~50 km to ~15 km, and underwent amphibolite facies retrograde metamorphism during the Middle Jurassic (~168 Ma) (Figure 9e). Meanwhile, the asthenosphere upwelling caused by the slab rollback process could have triggered the nearly simultaneous formation of a huge amount of magmatic rocks, which is in agreement with the widespread occurrence of the Middle to Late Jurassic (~168–153 Ma) arc magmatic rocks, adakites, and asthenosphere‐derived OIB‐type rocks to the north of the BNSZ (Figure 9f) (Li et al., 2016). More importantly, the Middle to Late Jurassic magmatic rocks are not only distributed along the southern margin of the Southern Qiangtang Block, but they have also been found at sites approximately 400 km away from the BNSZ (Figure 9f), further supporting the flat subduction mentioned above.

6 Conclusions
- The Dong Co eclogites, interpreted as the metamorphic product of the subducted Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys oceanic crust, experienced a peak metamorphism at eclogite‐facies conditions (T = 610–630°C and P = 2.4–2.6 GPa), strong overprinting at HP granulite facies conditions (T = 910–930°C and P = 1.2–1.4 GPa), and multiple stages of retrograde metamorphism.
- The Dong Co eclogites experienced a complex clockwise P ‐T ‐t path, including two sections of decompression‐dominated P ‐T path (M1 to M2 and M3 to M4) and one section of heating‐dominated (isobaric heating, M2 to M3) processes, which suggests a variation of exhumation velocities.
- Zircon and rutile SIMS U‐Pb dating results suggest that the age of crystallization for the protolith of the Dong Co eclogites is about 250 Ma, that the strong overprinting at HP granulite facies conditions occurred at ~177 Ma, and that the rutile lower intercept age of ~168 Ma could reflect the timing of the late stage of amphibolite facies retrograde metamorphism.
- Our new results suggest that the slow exhumation in response to flat subduction may have been an important mechanism for the granulite facies overprinting during the exhumation of oceanic eclogites.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank Editor‐in‐Chief Nathan A. Niemi, Associate Editor John Cottle, Chiara Groppo, and an anonymous reviewer for their constructive and insightful reviews. We thank Qiu‐Li Li, Xia‐Hua Li, Yu Liu, Guo‐Qiang Tang, Xiao‐Long Huang, and Lin‐Li Chen for their assistance in the laboratory operations of rutile SIMS U–Pb dating and EPMA. This study was jointly supported by the National Key R & D Program of China (2016YFC0600407), the Key Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDJ‐SSW‐DQC026), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41502054, 41630208, and 41372066), the Talent Project of Guangdong Province (2014TX01Z079), the Guangzhou Institute of Geochemistry, Chinese Academy of Sciences (GIGCAS 135 project (135TP201601)), and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation funded project (grant 2015M572374). This is contribution IS‐2470 from GIGCAS. Additional data sets supporting our conclusions are included in the supporting information files.
References
Citing Literature
Number of times cited according to CrossRef: 21
- Yiming Liu, Sanzhong Li, Chaoming Xie, M. Santosh, Yongjiang Liu, Yuchao Dong, Bin Wang, Runhua Guo, Xianzhi Cao, Subduction–collision and exhumation of eclogites in the Lhasa terrane, Tibet Plateau, Gondwana Research, 10.1016/j.gr.2020.01.019, (2020).
- Qing Qian, Jörg Hermann, Feiyu Dong, Liang Lin, Baolu Sun, Episodic formation of Neotethyan ophiolites (Tibetan plateau): Snapshots of abrupt global plate reorganizations during major episodes of supercontinent breakup?, Earth-Science Reviews, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103144, 203, (103144), (2020).
- Shi‐Min Li, Qing Wang, Di‐Cheng Zhu, Peter A. Cawood, Robert J. Stern, Roberto Weinberg, Zhidan Zhao, Xuan‐Xue Mo, Reconciling Orogenic Drivers for the Evolution of the Bangong‐Nujiang Tethys During Middle‐Late Jurassic, Tectonics, 10.1029/2019TC005951, 39, 2, (2020).
- Wei Dan, Qiang Wang, Xiu-Zheng Zhang, Gong-Jian Tang, Early Paleozoic S-type granites as the basement of Southern Qiantang Terrane, Tibet, Lithos, 10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105395, (105395), (2020).
- Li Hang, Wang Ming, Zeng Xiao Wen, Luo An Bo, Yu Yun Peng, Zeng Xian Jin, Generation of Jurassic high-Mg diorite and plagiogranite intrusions of the Asa area, Tibet: Products of intra-oceanic subduction of the Meso-Tethys Ocean, Lithos, 10.1016/j.lithos.2020.105481, (105481), (2020).
- Wang Xu, Fulai Liu, Yongsheng Dong, Cambrian to Triassic geodynamic evolution of central Qiangtang, Tibet, Earth-Science Reviews, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103083, (103083), (2020).
- Li-Zhi Shi, Jing-Yi Huang, Wei Chen, Birth and demise of the Bangong–Nujiang Tethyan Ocean: A review from the Gerze area of Central Tibet: Comment, Earth-Science Reviews, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2020.103209, (103209), (2020).
- Rui Wang, Dicheng Zhu, Qing Wang, Zengqian Hou, Zhiming Yang, Zhidan Zhao, Xuanxue Mo, Porphyry mineralization in the Tethyan orogen, Science China Earth Sciences, 10.1007/s11430-019-9609-0, (2020).
- Chaoming Xie, Yuhang Song, Menglong Duan, Li Su, Yujie Hao, Geochronology, geochemistry, origin, and tectonic implications of high‐pressure mafic granulites of the Amdo region, Central Tibet, Geological Journal, 10.1002/gj.3868, 0, 0, (2020).
- Peng Yang, Qiangtai Huang, Bin Xia, Zhanli Ren, Zhourong Cai, Hao Zheng, Xingxin Lu, Forearc tectonic evolution in the middle of the Bangong–Nujiang Tethys Ocean: New geochemical evidence of the Lanong ophiolites from the Zangbei lakes region, Geological Journal, 10.1002/gj.3626, 55, 5, (3917-3935), (2019).
- Huichuan Liu, Qiangtai Huang, I. Tonguç Uysal, Zhourong Cai, Zhifeng Wan, Bin Xia, Hao Zheng, Peng Yang, Geodynamics of the divergent double subduction along the Bangong-Nujiang Tethyan Suture Zone: insights from late Mesozoic intermediate-mafic rocks in central Tibet, Gondwana Research, 10.1016/j.gr.2019.09.018, (2019).
- Shun Li, Changqing Yin, Carl Guilmette, Lin Ding, Jian Zhang, Birth and demise of the Bangong-Nujiang Tethyan Ocean: A review from the Gerze area of central Tibet, Earth-Science Reviews, 10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102907, (102907), (2019).
- Li-Long Yan, Kai-Jun Zhang, Infant intra-oceanic arc magmatism due to initial subduction induced by oceanic plateau accretion: A case study of the Bangong Meso-Tethys, central Tibet, western China, Gondwana Research, 10.1016/j.gr.2019.08.008, (2019).
- Changzhou Deng, Deyou Sun, Guanghui Li, Sheng Lu, Zongyuan Tang, Jun Gou, Yuanjiang Yang, Early Cretaceous volcanic rocks in the Great Xing’an Range: Late effect of a flat-slab subduction, Journal of Geodynamics, 10.1016/j.jog.2019.01.012, (2019).
- Shun Li, Carl Guilmette, Changqing Yin, Lin Ding, Jian Zhang, Houqi Wang, Upendra Baral, Timing and mechanism of Bangong-Nujiang ophiolite emplacement in the Gerze area of central Tibet, Gondwana Research, 10.1016/j.gr.2019.01.019, 71, (179-193), (2019).
- FAN JianJun, ZHANG BoChuan, LIU HaiYong, LIU YiMing, YU YunPeng, HAO YuJie, AWANG DanZeng, Early-Middle Jurassic intra-oceanic subduction of the Bangong-Nujiang oceanic lithosphere: Evidence of the Dong Co ophiolite, Acta Petrologica Sinica, 10.18654/1000-0569/2019.10.06, 35, 10, (3048-3064), (2019).
- Yinbiao Peng, Shengyao Yu, Sanzhong Li, Yongjiang Liu, Liming Dai, Pei Lv, Runhua Guo, Yiming Liu, Yuhua Wang, Early Jurassic and Late Cretaceous granites in the Tongka micro-block, Central Tibet: Implications for the evolution of the Bangong-Nujiang ocean, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 10.1016/j.jseaes.2019.104030, (104030), (2019).
- Chao Li, G. H. Wang, Z. B. Zhao, J. X. Du, X. X. Ma, Y. L. Zheng, Late Mesozoic tectonic evolution of the central Bangong–Nujiang Suture Zone, central Tibetan Plateau, International Geology Review, 10.1080/00206814.2019.1697859, (1-24), (2019).
- Zong Yong Yang, Qiang Wang, Chunfu Zhang, Jin-Hui Yang, Lin Ma, Jun Wang, Peng Sun, Yue Qi, Cretaceous (~100 Ma) high-silica granites in the Gajin area, Central Tibet: Petrogenesis and implications for collision between the Lhasa and Qiangtang Terranes, Lithos, 10.1016/j.lithos.2018.11.011, (2018).
- Jian-Jun Fan, Cai Li, Zhen-Ming Sun, Wei Xu, Ming Wang, Chao-Ming Xie, Early Cretaceous MORB-type basalt and A-type rhyolite in northern Tibet: Evidence for ridge subduction in the Bangong–Nujiang Tethyan Ocean, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, 10.1016/j.jseaes.2017.12.020, 154, (187-201), (2018).
- Dian Li, Gen-hou Wang, Jinhan Gao, Guoli Yuan, Jie Zhou, Daren Fang, Li Zhang, Yidong Gong, Haichao Zhao, The continental subduction in the evolution of central qiangtang mélange belt and its tectonic significance, International Geology Review, 10.1080/00206814.2018.1499450, (1-28), (2018).











