Volume 38, Issue 12
Research Article

Retro‐foreland Basin Development in Response to Proto‐Tethyan Ocean Closure, NE Tibet Plateau

Zhen Yan

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: yanzhen@mail.iggcas.ac.cn

Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China

Correspondence to: Z. Yan,

E-mail address: yanzhen@mail.iggcas.ac.cn

Search for more papers by this author
Changlei Fu

Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan C. Aitchison

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Solomon Buckman

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Manlan Niu

Department of Resources and Environment, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China

Search for more papers by this author
Bo Cao

Institute of Geology, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yi Sun

Department of Resources and Environment, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xianqing Guo

Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zongqi Wang

Institute of Mineral Resources, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing, China

Search for more papers by this author
Renjie Zhou

School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 October 2019

Abstract

The compositions and ages of the sediments within retro or foreland basins that are formed and preserved adjacent to collisional orogens can reflect the nature of colliding tectonic elements. The nonmarine Yaoshuiquan and Huabaoshan formations in the South Qilian belt on the NE Tibetan Plateau deposited within a retro‐foreland basin setting during latest Ordovician to Late Silurian time in response to arc‐continent collision. Detritus derivation from a Cambro‐Ordovician arc‐ophiolite complex contains mixed 530‐480 Ma oceanic‐crust together with contributions from a 479‐450 Ma continental‐arc early in development of the basin. The Cambrian arc‐accretionary system and Central Qilian block united to form the basement of a continental arc at ~450 Ma, and both then contributed sediments to the Lianhuashan‐Huabaoshan basin. After the Hualong complex accreted to the north, a broad Andean‐type margin developed along the southern margin of the Central Qilian block from 450 to 440 Ma. These processes generated a wider basin that received detritus from both the south and the north. Consumption of the Proto‐Tethyan Ocean ended with collision between the Qaidam and Hualong blocks, which led to mass wasting of detritus from the Andean‐type igneous rocks and both blocks with the basin from 440 to 420 Ma.