Volume 125, Issue 6 e2019JD032345
Research Article

Uncertainty in the Response of Sudden Stratospheric Warmings and Stratosphere-Troposphere Coupling to Quadrupled CO2 Concentrations in CMIP6 Models

B. Ayarzagüena,

Corresponding Author

B. Ayarzagüena

Departamento de Física de la Tierra y Astrofísica, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

Correspondence to: B. Ayarzagüena,

bayarzag@ucm.es

Search for more papers by this author
A. J. Charlton-Perez,

A. J. Charlton-Perez

Department of Meteorology, University of Reading, Reading, UK

Search for more papers by this author
A. H. Butler,

A. H. Butler

Cooperative Institute for Environmental Sciences (CIRES)/National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Chemical Sciences Division, Boulder, CO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
P. Hitchcock,

P. Hitchcock

Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
I. R. Simpson,

I. R. Simpson

Climate and Global Dynamics Laboratory, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
L. M. Polvani,

L. M. Polvani

Department of Applied Physics and Applied Mathematics, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
N. Butchart,

N. Butchart

Met Office Hadley Centre, Exeter, UK

Search for more papers by this author
E. P. Gerber,

E. P. Gerber

Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
L. Gray,

L. Gray

NCAS-Climate, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
B. Hassler,

B. Hassler

Deutsches Zentrum für Luft-und Raumfahrt (DLR) Oberpfaffenhofen, Weßling, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
P. Lin,

P. Lin

Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences Program, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA

Search for more papers by this author
F. Lott,

F. Lott

Laboratoire de Météorologie Dynamique, Ecole Normale Supérieure, Paris, France

Search for more papers by this author
E. Manzini,

E. Manzini

Max-Planck-Institut für Meteorologie, Hamburg, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
R. Mizuta,

R. Mizuta

Meteorological Research Institute, Tsukuba, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
C. Orbe,

C. Orbe

NASA Goddard Institute for Space Studies, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
S. Osprey,

S. Osprey

NCAS-Climate, Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
D. Saint-Martin,

D. Saint-Martin

Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques (CNRM), Université de Toulouse, Météo-France, CNRS, Toulouse, France

Search for more papers by this author
M. Sigmond,

M. Sigmond

Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment and Climate Change Canada, Victoria, BC, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
M. Taguchi,

M. Taguchi

Department of Earth Science, Aichi University of Education, Kariya, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
E. M. Volodin,

E. M. Volodin

Marchuk Institute of Numerical Mathematics, Moscow, Russia

Search for more papers by this author
S. Watanabe,

S. Watanabe

Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology (JAMSTEC), Yokohama, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 February 2020
Citations: 18

This article is published with the permission of the Controller of HMSO and the Queen's Printer for Scotland.

Abstract

Major sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs), vortex formation, and final breakdown dates are key highlight points of the stratospheric polar vortex. These phenomena are relevant for stratosphere-troposphere coupling, which explains the interest in understanding their future changes. However, up to now, there is not a clear consensus on which projected changes to the polar vortex are robust, particularly in the Northern Hemisphere, possibly due to short data record or relatively moderate CO2 forcing. The new simulations performed under the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project, Phase 6, together with the long daily data requirements of the DynVarMIP project in preindustrial and quadrupled CO2 (4xCO2) forcing simulations provide a new opportunity to revisit this topic by overcoming the limitations mentioned above. In this study, we analyze this new model output to document the change, if any, in the frequency of SSWs under 4xCO2 forcing. Our analysis reveals a large disagreement across the models as to the sign of this change, even though most models show a statistically significant change. As for the near-surface response to SSWs, the models, however, are in good agreement as to this signal over the North Atlantic: There is no indication of a change under 4xCO2 forcing. Over the Pacific, however, the change is more uncertain, with some indication that there will be a larger mean response. Finally, the models show robust changes to the seasonal cycle in the stratosphere. Specifically, we find a longer duration of the stratospheric polar vortex and thus a longer season of stratosphere-troposphere coupling.