Regular Section
The Value of clean water: The public's willingness to pay for boatable, fishable, and swimmable quality water
Richard T. Carson,
Robert Cameron Mitchell,
Richard T. Carson
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Cameron Mitchell
Search for more papers by this authorRichard T. Carson,
Robert Cameron Mitchell,
Richard T. Carson
Search for more papers by this authorRobert Cameron Mitchell
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper presents the findings of a study designed to determine the national benefits of freshwater pollution control. By using data from a national contingent valuation survey, we estimate the aggregate benefits of meeting the goals of the Clean Water Act. A valuation function is estimated which depicts willingness to pay as a function of water quality, income, and other variables. Several validation checks and tests for specific biases are performed, and the benefit estimates are corrected for missing and invalid responses. The two major policy implications from our work are that the benefits and costs of water pollution control efforts are roughly equal and that many of the new policy actions necessary to ensure that all water bodies reach at least a swimmable quality level will not have positive net benefits.
References
- Boyle, K. J., R. C. Bishop, M. P. Welsh, Starting points bias in contingent valuation surveys, Land Econ., 61, 188–194, 1985.
- Bratton, D., G. L. Rutledge, Pollution abatement and control expenditures, 1985–1988, Surv. Curr. Bus., 70, 32–38, 1990.
- Breiman, L., J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, C. J. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees, Wadsworth, Belmont, Calif., 1984.
- , Cambridge Economics, Inc., Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Symposium, Cambridge, Mass., 1992.
- Carson, R. T., N. J. Carson, A. Alberini, N. Flores, J. Wright, A Bibliography of Contingent Valuation Studies and Papers, Natural Resource of Damage Assessment, Inc., La Jolla, Calif., 1993.
- Cummings, R. G., D. S. Brookshire, W. D. Schulze, Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, N. J., 1986.
- Dorfman, R., Incidence of the benefits and costs of environmental programs, Am. Econ. Rev., 67, 333–340, 1977.
- Feenberg, D., E. S. Mills, Measuring the Benefits of Water Pollution Abatement, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1980.
- Fisher, A. N., R. Raucher, Intrinsic benefits of improved water quality: Conceptual and empirical perspectives, Advances in Applied Micro-Economics V. K. Smith, JAI Press, Greenwich, Colo., 1984.
- Freeman, A. M., Air and Water Pollution Control: A Benefit Cost Assessment, John Wiley, New York, 1982.
- Freeman, A. M., Water pollution policy, Public Policies for Environmental Protection P. Portney, Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C., 1990.
- Goldberger, A. S., The interpretation and estimation of Cobb-Douglas functions, Econometrica, 35, 464–472, 1968.
- Goldfeld, S. M., R. G. Quandt, Nonlinear Methods in Econometrics, North-Holland, New York, 1972.
- Gramlich, F. W., The demand for clean water: The case of the Charles River, Nat. Tax J., 30, 183–194, 1977.
- Greenley, D. A., R. G. Walsh, R. A. Young, Economic Benefits of Improved Water Quality: Public Perceptions of Option and Preservation Values, Westview, Boulder, Colo., 1982.
- Hahn, R. W., A Primer on Environmental Policy Design, Harwood, New York, 1989.
- Hoehn, J. P., Valuing the multidimensional impacts of environmental policy: Theory and methods, Am. J. Agric. Econ., 73, 289–299, 1991.
- Hoehn, J. P., A. Randall, A Satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuation, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 14, 226–247, 1987.
- Hoehn, J. P., A. Rall, Too many proposals pass the benefit cost test, Am. Econ. Rev., 79, 544–551, 1989.
- Kahneman, D., Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method R. Cummings, D. Brookshire, W. Schulze, Rowman and Littlefield, Totowa, N. J., 1986.
- Kahneman, D., J. L. Knetsch, Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 22, 57–70, 1992.
- Lake, E., W. M. Hanemann, I. Strand, Who Pays for Clean Water?: The Distribution of Water Pollution Control Cost, Westview, Boulder, Colo., 1979.
- Leone, R. A., J. E. Jackson, The political economy of federal regulatory activity: The case of water-pollution controls, Studies in Public Regulation G. Fromm, MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1981.
- Lyon, R. M., S. Farrow, An analysis of clean water act issuesAssociation of Environmental and Resource Economists meetingAnaheim, Calif.January, 1993.
- Madow, W. G., H. Nisselson, I. Olkin, Incomplete Data in Sample Surveys, Academic, San Diego, Calif., 1983.
- Mitchell, R. C., R. T. Carson, An experiment in determining willingness to pay for national water quality improvements, report to the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyResources for the Future, Washington, D. C., 1981.
- Mitchell, R. C., R. T. Carson, A contingent valuation estimate of national freshwater benefits, report to the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyResour. for the Future, Washington, D. C., 1984.
- Mitchell, R. C., R. T. Carson, The use of contingent valuation data for benefit/cost analysis in water pollution control, report to the U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyResour. for the Future, Washington, D. C., 1986.
- Mitchell, R. C., R. T. Carson, Using Surveys to Value the Benefits for Public Goods, Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C., 1989.
- Randall, A., B. Ives, C. Eastman, Bidding games for valuation of aesthetic environmental improvements, J. Environ. Manage., 1, 132–149, 1974.
- Smith, V. K., Uncertainty, benefit-cost analysis, and the treatment of option value, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 14, 283–292, 1987.
- Smith, V. K., Arbitrary values, good causes, and premature verdicts, J. Environ. Econ. Manage., 22, 71–89, 1992.
- Smith, V. K., W. H. Desvousges, Measuring Water Quality Benefits, Kluwer, Academic, Hingham, Mass., 1986.
10.1007/978-94-009-4223-3 Google Scholar
- , U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental investment: The cost of a clean environment, report to Congress, Washington, D. C., 1990.
- White, H. L., A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity, Econometrica, 48, 817–838, 1980.
- Willig, R. D., Consumer surplus without apology, Am. Econ. Rev., 66, 587–597, 1976.
