Marine eDNA Production and Loss Mechanisms
Corresponding Author
Elizabeth Brasseale
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Correspondence to:
E. Brasseale,
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization
Search for more papers by this authorNicolaus Adams
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorElizabeth Andruszkiewicz Allan
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition
Search for more papers by this authorEiren K. Jacobson
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland
Contribution: Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorRyan P. Kelly
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition
Search for more papers by this authorOwen R. Liu
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Software, Validation, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorStephanie Moore
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Methodology, Resources, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorMegan Shaffer
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorJilian Xiong
School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorKim Parsons
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Elizabeth Brasseale
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Correspondence to:
E. Brasseale,
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization
Search for more papers by this authorNicolaus Adams
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorElizabeth Andruszkiewicz Allan
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition
Search for more papers by this authorEiren K. Jacobson
School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Scotland
Contribution: Methodology, Software, Validation, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorRyan P. Kelly
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition
Search for more papers by this authorOwen R. Liu
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Software, Validation, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorStephanie Moore
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Methodology, Resources, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorMegan Shaffer
School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorJilian Xiong
School of Oceanography, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Resources, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing
Search for more papers by this authorKim Parsons
Conservation Biology Division, Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA, USA
Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Data curation, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Environmental DNA (eDNA) analysis is a technique for detecting organisms based on genetic material in environments such as air, water, or soil. Observed eDNA concentrations vary in space and time due to biological and environmental processes. Here, we investigate variability in eDNA production and loss by sampling water adjacent to a managed population of non-native cetaceans on a near-hourly timescale for 48 hr. We used diverse sampling approaches and modeling methods to describe time variability in observed eDNA concentrations and then compare the magnitude of production and loss mechanisms. We parsed production and loss in a conceptual box model and compared biological and physical loss rates using a decay experiment and a physical transport-and-diffusion tracer model. We then evaluated eDNA concentrations along a transect away from the animal enclosure in light of model parameter estimates. We conclude that eDNA production is best conceptualized using a time-varying mixed-state model, and biological losses are small relative to physical losses in the marine environment. Because physical loss is unsteady and nonlinear, tracer models are especially helpful tools to estimate it accurately.
Key Points
-
Atlantic bottlenose dolphin eDNA was sampled at near-hourly frequency, and concentrations varying by over three orders of magnitude
-
A model of background eDNA production with episodic larger eDNA production events best explained near-hourly variability
-
Little genetic material persisted hour to hour, and most eDNA loss was attributable to physical rather than biological processes
Plain Language Summary
Environmental DNA (eDNA) is the genetic material of animals, bacteria, or plants that can be found in air, soil, or water samples. Using eDNA for marine ecology is complicated, however, because animals may shed DNA at irregular rates and once shed, eDNA is moved by ocean currents and broken apart by microbes. To better understand the fate of eDNA, we sampled water repeatedly near an enclosure of non-native dolphins in Hood Canal, Washington to see how much eDNA concentrations changed hourly over 2 days. We compared models built on different explanations for dolphin eDNA variability. Observations were best explained by a model where dolphins shed DNA at steady background rate but could occasionally shed large amounts of eDNA (presumably through defecation). In that model, over half of eDNA was lost each hour. To distinguish biological and physical loss rates, we estimated degradation in the lab and ocean current transport and diffusion using an ocean model. The diffusion rate from the ocean model matched observed eDNA better than biological decay rates, which were much lower. By better understanding how eDNA is produced and where it goes in the ocean, we can better interpret our eDNA measurements to learn about marine ecosystems.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The ESP, dolphin occupancy, and tide data and R NIMBLE model codes used for Part 1 are archived and available at https://zenodo.org/doi/10.5281/zenodo.12735445.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
2024JC021643-sup-0001-Supporting Information SI-S01.pdf576 KB | Supporting Information S1 |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Allan, E. A., DiBenedetto, M. H., Lavery, A. C., Govindarajan, A. F., & Zhang, W. G. (2021). Modeling characterization of the vertical and temporal variability of environmental dna in the mesopelagic ocean. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 21273. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00288-5
- Allan, E. A., Kelly, R. P., D’Agnese, E. R., Garber-Yonts, M. N., Shaffer, M. R., Gold, Z. J., & Shelton, A. O. (2023). Quantifying impacts of an environmental intervention using environmental dna. Ecological Applications, 33(8), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2914
- Allan, E. A., Zhang, W. G., Lavery, A. C., & Govindarajan, A. F. (2020). Environmental dna shedding and decay rates from diverse animal forms and thermal regimes. Environmental DNA, 3(2), 492–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.141
10.1002/edn3.141 Google Scholar
- Augustine, B. C., Hutchins, P. R., Jones, D. N., Williams, J. R., Leinonen, E., & Sepulveda, A. J. (2024). A hierarchical model for edna fate and transport dynamics accommodating low concentration samples. bioRxiv preprint, 1–61. https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.03.27.586987
10.1101/2024.03.27.586987 Google Scholar
- Baetscher, D. S., Pochardt, M. R., Barry, P. D., & Larson, W. A. (2024). Tide impacts the dispersion of edna from nearshore net pens in a dynamic high-latitude marine environment. Environmental DNA, 6(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.533
- Brandão-Dias, P. F. P., Hallack, D. M. C., Snyder, E. D., Tank, J. L., Bolster, D., Volponi, S., et al. (2023). Particle size influences decay rates of environmental dna in aquatic systems. Molecular Ecology Resources, 23(4), 756–770. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13751
- Carraro, L., Mächler, E., Wüthrich, R., & Altermatt, F. (2020). Environmental dna allows upscaling spatial patterns of biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems. Nature Communications, 11(3585), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17337-8
- Cerco, C. F., Schultz, M. T., Noel, M. R., Skahill, B., & Kim, S. (2018). A fate and transport model for asian carp environmental dna in the chicago area waterways system. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 44(4), 813–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jglr.2018.04.010
- Collins, R. A., Wangensteen, O. S., O’Gorman, E. J., Mariani, S., Sims, D. W., & Genner, M. J. (2018). Persistence of environmental dna in marine systems. Nature Communications Biology, 1(8), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0192-6
- de Valpine, P., Paciorek, C., Turek, D., Michaud, N., Anderson-Bergman, C., Obermeyer, F., et al. (2024a). NIMBLE: MCMC, particle filtering, and programmable hierarchical modeling. [Computer software manual]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1211190
10.5281/zenodo.1211190 Google Scholar
- de Valpine, P., Paciorek, C., Turek, D., Michaud, N., Anderson-Bergman, C., Obermeyer, F., et al. (2024b). NIMBLE user manual. [Computer software manual]. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1211190
10.5281/zenodo.1211190 Google Scholar
- de Valpine, P., Turek, D., Paciorek, C., Anderson-Bergman, C., Temple Lang, D., & Bodik, R. (2017). Programming with models: Writing statistical algorithms for general model structures with NIMBLE. Journal of Computational & Graphical Statistics, 26(2), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/10618600.2016.1172487
- Ely, T., Barber, P. H., Man, L., & Gold, Z. (2021). Short-lived detection of an introduced vertebrate edna signal in a nearshore rocky reef environment. PLoS One, 16(6), e0245314. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245314
- Fukaya, K., Murakami, H., Yoon, S., Minami, K., Osada, Y., Yamamoto, S., et al. (2020). Estimating fish population abundance by integrating quantitative data on environmental dna and hydrodynamic modelling. Molecular Ecology, 30(13), 3057–3067. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.15530
- Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.2307/2246093
- Goldberg, C. S., Turner, C. R., Deiner, K., Klymus, K. E., Thomsen, P. F., Murphy, M. A., et al. (2016). Critical considerations for the application of environmental dna methods to detect aquatic species. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(11), 1299–1307. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12595
- Hicks, B. D., St. Aubin, D. J., Geraci, J., & Brown, W. (1985). Epidermal growth in the bottlenose dolphin, Tursiops truncatus. Journal of Investigative Dermatology, 1, 60–63.
10.1111/1523-1747.ep12275348 Google Scholar
- Jaquet, N., & Whitehead, H. (1999). Movements, distribution and feeding success of sperm whales in the pacific ocean, over scales of days and tens of kilometers. Environmental DNA, 25, 1–13.
- Jensen, M. R., Sigsgaard, E. E., de Paula Ávila, M., Agersnap, S., Brenner-Larsen, W., Sengupta, M. E., et al. (2022). Short-term temporal variation of coastal marine edna. Environmental DNA, 4, 747–762. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.285
- Jo, T., Arimoto, M., Murakami, H., Masuda, R., & Minamoto, T. (2019). Estimating shedding and decay rates of environmental nuclear dna with relation to water temperature and biomass. Environmental DNA, 2, 140–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.51
10.1002/edn3.51 Google Scholar
- Jo, T., & Yamanaka, H. (2022). Fine-tuning the performance of abundance estimation based on environmental dna (edna) focusing on edna particle size and marker length. Ecoloy and Evolution, 12(8), e9234. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.9234
- Keller, A. G., Grason, E. W., McDonald, P. S., Ramón-Laca, A., & Kelly, R. P. (2022). Tracking an invasion front with environmental dna. Ecological Applications, 32(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/eap.2561
- Kutti, T., Johnsen, I. A., Skaar, K. S., Ray, J. L., Husa, V., & Dahlgren, T. G. (2020). Quantification of edna to map the distribution of cold-water coral reefs. Frontiers in Marine Science, 7(446), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2020.00446
- Lamb, P. D., Fonseca, V. G., Maxwell, D. L., & Nnanatu, C. C. (2022). Systematic review and meta-analysis: Water type and temperature affect environmental dna decay. Molecular Ecology Resources, 22(7), 2494–2505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.13627
- Lutscher, F., Pachepsky, E., & Lewis, M. A. (2005). The effect of dispersal patterns on stream populations. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 47(4), 749–772. https://doi.org/10.1137/050636152
- MacCready, P., McCabe, R. M., Siedlecki, S. A., Lorenz, M., Giddings, S. N., Bos, J., et al. (2021). Estuarine circulation, mixing, and residence times in the salish sea. Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans, 126(2), e2020JC016738. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JC016738
- Mass, C. F., Albright, M., Ovens, D., Steed, R., Maciver, M., Grimit, E., et al. (2003). Regional environmental prediction over the pacific northwest. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 84(10), 1353–1366. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-84-10-1353
- McCartin, L. J., Vohsen, S. A., Ambrose, S. W., Layden, M., McFadden, C. S., Cordes, E. E., et al. (2022). Temperature controls edna persistence across physicochemicalconditions in seawater. Environmental Science and Technology, 56(12), 8629–8639. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c01672
- Metzger, E. J., Smedstad, O. M., Thoppil, P. G., Hurlburt, H. E., Cummings, J. A., Wallcraft, A. J., et al. (2014). Us navy operational global ocean and arctic ice prediction systems. Oceanography, 27(3), 32–43. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2014.66
- Mofjeld, H. O., & Larsen, L. H. (1984). Tides and tidal currents of the inland waters of western Washington (Vol. ERL PMEL-56; NOAA Technical Memorandum). Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory.
- Murakami, H., Yoon, S., Kasai, A., Minamoto, T., Yamamoto, S., Sakata, M. K., et al. (2019). Dispersion and degradation of environmental dna from caged fish in a marine environment. Fisheries Science, 85(2), 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12562-018-1282-6
- Ramón-Laca, A., Wells, A., & Park, L. (2021). A workflow for the relative quantification of multiple fish species from oceanic water samples using environmental dna (edna) to support large-scale fishery surveys. PLoS One, 16(9), e0257773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257773
- Ridgway, S. H. (1972). Homeostasis in the aquatic environment. In S. H. Ridgway (Ed.), Mammals of the sea: Biology and medicine (pp. 590–747). Charles C Thomas.
- Scholin, C. A., Birch, J., Jensen, S., Marin, R., Massion, E., Pargett, D., et al. (2018). The quest to develop ecogenomic sensors: A 25-year history of the environmental sample processor (esp) as a case study. Oceanography, 30(4), 100–113. https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2017.427
10.5670/oceanog.2017.427 Google Scholar
- Sepulveda, A. J., Birch, J. M., Barnhart, E. P., Merkes, C. M., Yamahara, K. M., Marin, R., et al. (2020). Robotic environmental dna bio-surveillance of freshwater health. Scientific Reports, 10(14389), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71304-3
- Shchepetkin, A. F., & McWilliams, J. C. (2005). The regional oceanic modeling system (roms): A split-explicit, free-surface, topography-following-coordinate oceanic model. Ocean Modelling, 9(4), 347–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocemod.2004.08.002
- Shea, D., Frazer, N., Wadhawan, K., Bateman, A., Li, S., Miller, K. M., et al. (2022). Environmental dna dispersal from atlantic salmon farms. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 79(9), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfas-2021-0216
- Shogren, A. J., Tank, J. L., Andruszkiewicz, E. A., Olds, B., Mahon, A. R., Jerde, C. L., & Bolster, D. (2017). Controls on edna movement in streams: Transport, retention, and resuspension. Scientific Reports, 7, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-05223-1
- Shogren, A. J., Tank, J. L., Egan, S. P., Bolster, D., & Riis, T. (2019). Riverine distribution of mussel environmental dna reflects a balance among density, transport, and removal processes. Freshwater Biology, 64(8), 1467–1479. https://doi.org/10.1111/fwb.13319
- Visser, A. (1997). Using random walk models to simulate the vertical distribution of particles in a turbulent water column. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 158, 275–281. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps158275
- Walz, K., Yamahara, K., Michisaki, R. P., & Chavez, F. P. (2019). Mbari environmental dna (edna) extraction using qiagen dneasy blood and tissue kit. Moss Landing, CA. [Computer software manual]. https://doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.xjufknw
10.17504/protocols.io.xjufknw Google Scholar
- Watanabe, S. (2013). A widely applicable bayesian information criterion. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 14, 867–897. Retrieved from https://www.jmlr.org/
- Wood, Z. T., Lacourseière-Roussel, A., LeBlanc, F., Trudel, M., Kinnison, M. T., Garry McBrine, C., et al. (2021). Spatial heterogeneity of edna transport improves stream assessment of threatened salmon presence, abundance, and location. Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, 9(650717), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2021.650717
10.3389/fevo.2021.650717 Google Scholar
- Xiong, J., & MacCready, P. (2024). Intercomparisons of five ocean particle tracking software packages. Geoscientific Model Development, 17(8), 3341–3356. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-17-3341-2024
- Xiong, J., MacCready, P., Brasseale, E. A., Allan, E. A., Ramón-Laca, A., Parsons, K., et al. (2025). Advective transport drives environmental dna dispersal in an estuary. Environmental Science and Technology.
- Yamahara, K. M., Demir-Hilton, E., Preston, C. M., Marin, R., Pargett, D., Roman, B., et al. (2015). Simultaneous monitoring of faecal indicators and harmful algae using an in-situ autonomous sensor. Letters in Applied Microbiology, 61(2), 130–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/lam.12432
- Yamamoto, S., Minami, K., Fukaya, K., Takahashi, K., Sawada, H., Murakami, H., et al. (2016). Environmental dna as a ’snapshot’ of fish distribution: A case study of Japanese jack mackarel in maizuru bay, sea of Japan. PLoS One, 11(3), e0149786. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0149786
- Yates, M. C., Gaudet-Boulay, M., Garcia Machado, E., Côté, G., Gilbert, A., & Bernatchez, L. (2023). How much is enough? Examining the sampling effort necessary to estimate mean edna concentrations in lentic systems. Environmental DNA, 00, 0–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.461
10.1002/edn3.461 Google Scholar