Volume 37, Issue 12 e2023GB007804
Research Article

Neutral Tropical African CO2 Exchange Estimated From Aircraft and Satellite Observations

Benjamin Gaubert

Corresponding Author

Benjamin Gaubert

Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory (ACOM), NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA

Correspondence to:

B. Gaubert,

[email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Visualization

Search for more papers by this author
Britton B. Stephens

Britton B. Stephens

Earth Observing Laboratory (EOL), NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA

Contribution: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Data curation, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition

Search for more papers by this author
David F. Baker

David F. Baker

Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Sourish Basu

Sourish Basu

Global Modeling and Assimilation Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Bertolacci

Michael Bertolacci

School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Kevin W. Bowman

Kevin W. Bowman

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Rebecca Buchholz

Rebecca Buchholz

Atmospheric Chemistry Observations & Modeling Laboratory (ACOM), NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (NSF NCAR), Boulder, CO, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Abhishek Chatterjee

Abhishek Chatterjee

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

Contribution: Data curation

Search for more papers by this author
Frédéric Chevallier

Frédéric Chevallier

Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de L’Environnement, Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, CEDEX, France

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Róisín Commane

Róisín Commane

Department of Earth & Environmental Sciences, Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, Columbia University, Palisades, NY, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Noel Cressie

Noel Cressie

School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Feng Deng

Feng Deng

Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

Contribution: Data curation

Search for more papers by this author
Nicole Jacobs

Nicole Jacobs

Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Visualization

Search for more papers by this author
Matthew S. Johnson

Matthew S. Johnson

Earth Science Division, NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, CA, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Shamil S. Maksyutov

Shamil S. Maksyutov

National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Japan

Contribution: Data curation

Search for more papers by this author
Kathryn McKain

Kathryn McKain

Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA

NOAA Global Monitoring Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Junjie Liu

Junjie Liu

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Zhiqiang Liu

Zhiqiang Liu

State Key Laboratory of Numerical Modeling for Atmospheric Sciences and Geophysical Fluid Dynamics, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China

Contribution: Data curation

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Morgan

Eric Morgan

Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Chris O’Dell

Chris O’Dell

Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Sajeev Philip

Sajeev Philip

Centre for Atmospheric Sciences, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Eric Ray

Eric Ray

NOAA Chemical Sciences Laboratory, Boulder, CO, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
David Schimel

David Schimel

Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, USA

Contribution: Writing - review & editing, Project administration, Funding acquisition

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Schuh

Andrew Schuh

Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas E. Taylor

Thomas E. Taylor

Cooperative Institute for Research in the Atmosphere, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Contribution: Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Brad Weir

Brad Weir

Universities Space Research Association, Columbia, MD, USA

NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Dave van Wees

Dave van Wees

BeZero Carbon Ltd, Gorsuch Place, Senna Building, E2 8JF London, UK

Department of Earth Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, 1081 HV The Netherlands

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Steven C. Wofsy

Steven C. Wofsy

School of Engineering and Applied Science and Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Andrew Zammit-Mangion

Andrew Zammit-Mangion

School of Mathematics and Applied Statistics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

Contribution: Data curation

Search for more papers by this author
Ning Zeng

Ning Zeng

Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Science and Earth System Science Interdisciplinary Center, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 December 2023
Citations: 2

Abstract

Tropical lands play an important role in the global carbon cycle yet their contribution remains uncertain owing to sparse observations. Satellite observations of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) have greatly increased spatial coverage over tropical regions, providing the potential for improved estimates of terrestrial fluxes. Despite this advancement, the spread among satellite-based and in-situ atmospheric CO2 flux inversions over northern tropical Africa (NTA), spanning 0–24°N, remains large. Satellite-based estimates of an annual source of 0.8–1.45 PgC yr−1 challenge our understanding of tropical and global carbon cycling. Here, we compare posterior mole fractions from the suite of inversions participating in the Orbiting Carbon Observatory 2 (OCO-2) Version 10 Model Intercomparison Project (v10 MIP) with independent in-situ airborne observations made over the tropical Atlantic Ocean by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Atmospheric Tomography (ATom) mission during four seasons. We develop emergent constraints on tropical African CO2 fluxes using flux-concentration relationships defined by the model suite. We find an annual flux of 0.14 ± 0.39 PgC yr−1 (mean and standard deviation) for NTA, 2016–2018. The satellite-based flux bias suggests a potential positive concentration bias in OCO-2 B10 and earlier version retrievals over land in NTA during the dry season. Nevertheless, the OCO-2 observations provide improved flux estimates relative to the in situ observing network at other times of year, indicating stronger uptake in NTA during the wet season than the in-situ inversion estimates.

Key Points

  • Emergent constraints derived from aircraft carbon dioxide (CO2) measurements and inversions estimate a near neutral northern tropical African CO2 budget

  • Inversions using satellite observations overestimate annual emissions from northern tropical Africa (NTA) by approximately 1 PgC yr−1

  • Satellite CO2 observations imply a strong sink during the wet season over NTA

Plain Language Summary

Satellite carbon dioxide (CO2) observations over land imply a major revision to our understanding of the global carbon cycle linked to large emissions from northern tropical Africa (NTA) during the dry season, from October to May. We use aircraft observations made over the Atlantic Ocean in four seasons to evaluate flux models driven by a range of ground and satellite observations. Our results show that models using satellite observations over land overestimate annual emissions from NTA by approximately 1 PgC yr−1, concentrated in the dry season. At other times of year, satellite CO2 observations provide improved estimates of NTA exchange, with a stronger CO2 uptake during the wet season.

Data Availability Statement

The ATom data (Wofsy et al., 2021) is available as 10-s, NOAA PFP, and Medusa merge products. The OCO-2 v10 MIP model results are publicly available (Baker et al., 2023). The NOAA Greenhouse Gas Marine Boundary Layer Reference (Dlugokencky et al., 2019) is publicly available, last accessed 17 August 2023).