Volume 124, Issue 13
Research Article

Recent Warming of Landfalling Atmospheric Rivers Along the West Coast of the United States

Katerina R. Gonzales

Corresponding Author

E-mail address: kgonzal@stanford.edu

Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Correspondence to: K. R. Gonzales,

E-mail address: kgonzal@stanford.edu

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel L. Swain

Institute of the Environment and Sustainability, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA

Capacity Center for Climate and Weather Extremes, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, CO, USA

The Nature Conservancy of California, San Francisco, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Kyle M. Nardi

Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth A. Barnes

Department of Atmospheric Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Noah S. Diffenbaugh

Department of Earth System Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Woods Institute for the Environment, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 30 May 2019
Citations: 2

Abstract

Atmospheric rivers (ARs) often generate extreme precipitation, with AR temperature strongly influencing hydrologic impacts by altering the timing and magnitude of runoff. Long‐term changes in AR temperatures therefore have important implications for regional hydroclimate—especially in locations where a shift to more rain‐dominated AR precipitation could affect flood risk and/or water storage in snowpack. In this study, we provide the first climatology of AR temperature across five U.S. West Coast subregions. We then assess trends in landfalling AR temperatures for each subregion from 1980 to 2016 using three reanalysis products. We find AR warming at seasonal and monthly scales. Cool‐season warming ranges from 0.69 to 1.65 °C over the study period. We detect monthly scale warming of >2 °C, with the most widespread warming occurring in November and March. To understand the causes of AR warming, we quantify the density of AR tracks from genesis to landfall and analyze along‐track AR temperature for each month and landfall region. We investigate three possible influences on AR temperature trends at landfall: along‐track temperatures prior to landfall, background temperatures over the landfall region, and AR temperature over the coastal ocean adjacent to the region of landfall. Generally, AR temperatures at landfall more closely match coastal and background temperature trends than along‐track AR temperature trends. The seasonal asymmetry of the AR warming and the heterogeneity of influences have important implications for regional water storage and flood risk—demonstrating that changes in AR characteristics are complex and may not be directly inferred from changes in the background climate.

Plain Language Summary

Atmospheric river (AR) storms are well known for their ability to accumulate snowpack, provide drought relief, and generate extreme precipitation and flooding along the West Coast of the United States. AR temperature is an important variable for determining the water resource impacts of a given event, such as the ratio of rain to snow delivered by an individual storm. As a result, changes in AR temperature have implications for both water storage and flood risk. We find substantial warming in ARs at both the seasonal and monthly scales, as well as seasonal and regional variations in the amount of warming along the U.S. West Coast. To understand the warming of ARs at the landfall regions, we compare these trends with trends in temperature along the AR tracks, background temperature over the landfall region, and temperature over the coastal ocean adjacent to the landfall region. The most robust warming occurs in November and March, which has important implications for increased regional flood risk and decreased water storage, and motivates further investigation in other AR‐prone regions around the globe.