The upper ocean dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) concentration is regulated by advective and diffusive transport divergence, biological processes, freshwater, and air-sea CO2 fluxes. The relative importance of these mechanisms in the Southern Ocean is uncertain, as year-round observations in this area have been limited. We use a novel physical-biogeochemical state estimate of the Southern Ocean to construct a closed DIC budget of the top 650 m and investigate the spatial and temporal variability of the different components of the carbon system. The dominant mechanisms of variability in upper ocean DIC depend on location and time and space scales considered. Advective transport is the most influential mechanism and governs the local DIC budget across the 10 day–5 year timescales analyzed. Diffusive effects are nearly negligible. The large-scale transport structure is primarily set by upwelling and downwelling, though both the lateral ageostrophic and geostrophic transports are significant. In the Antarctic Circumpolar Current, the carbon budget components are also influenced by the presence of topography and biological hot spots. In the subtropics, evaporation and air-sea CO2 flux primarily balances the sink due to biological production and advective transport. Finally, in the subpolar region sea ice processes, which change the seawater volume and thus the DIC concentration, compensate the large impact of the advective transport and modulate the timing of biological activity and air-sea CO2 flux.
- The carbon budget in the Southern Ocean is analyzed using a physical-biogeochemical state estimate for the years 2008–2012
- The dissolved inorganic carbon budget is dominated by variability in the overturning circulation
- Temporal variability is enhanced near topography and fronts
The Southern Ocean contributes importantly to the global climate system through the upwelling of deep, centuries-old water that is rich in carbon and nutrients [Morrison et al., 2015; Talley, 2013]. These deep waters are then transformed by exchange with the atmosphere and the upper and intermediate waters, and eventually sink again [Marshall and Speer, 2012; Talley, 2013], transporting dissolved gases with them. This work focuses on the cycle of dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC). DIC is of particular importance because it is directly linked to atmospheric CO2 concentrations. The DIC distribution is set by physical and biological processes as well as air-sea flux of CO2, as outlined in the next few paragraphs.
The physical processes of advection and diffusion transport and mix DIC between ocean basins, across fronts, and between the surface and the abyss, affecting its spatial and temporal variability. From the wind-driven large-scale circulation to the energetic submesoscale eddies, the ocean circulation modulates the exchange of carbon laterally and vertically within the ocean and exchanges with the atmosphere [e.g., Bakker et al., 1997; Boyd et al., 2000; Ito et al., 2004; Lovenduski et al., 2008; Resplandy et al., 2014].
The biological mechanisms of photosynthesis and remineralization impact the DIC concentration [Unkovich et al., 2013]. Biological productivity draws DIC down and is limited by light and the availability of nutrients and trace metals including iron [Martin, 1990]. Productivity in the Southern Ocean is exceptionally large where the limitation of iron is not active [e.g., Blain et al., 2007]. Iron can be supplied by dust deposition [Mahowald et al., 2005], mixing [e.g., Park et al., 2008], stirring [e.g., Abraham et al., 2000], entrainment of the mixed-layer depth [Carranza and Gille, 2015], wind-driven upwelling [Gille et al., 2014], and meso- and submesoscale vertical processes [e.g., Boyd et al., 2000; Coale et al., 2004; Blain et al., 2007; Rosso et al., 2016]. Locations of enhanced biological activity, due to nutrient and iron enhancement, are found along the Polar Front [Moore and Abbott, 2000], close to islands and larger topographic features including the Crozet Islands [e.g., Planquette et al., 2007] and the Kerguelen Plateau [e.g., Chever et al., 2010; Bowie et al., 2015; Gille et al., 2014], and in Antarctic waters including the Weddell and Scotia Seas [e.g., de Baar et al., 1990] and the Ross Sea [e.g., Arrigo and van Dijken, 2004].
The DIC concentration budget is also physically affected by changes in seawater volume due to freshwater flux, because concentration is mass per unit volume. The freshwater flux arises from precipitation, evaporation, sea ice growth and melt, glacial runoff, and river input. These processes can be particularly large in the subtropics, due to high evaporation [Talley, 2008], in the Antarctic Circumpolar Current (ACC) due to net precipitation [e.g., Cerovečki et al., 2013], and in the sea ice zone where ice transport redistributes freshwater [Abernathey et al., 2016].
Carbon dioxide exchange between the ocean and atmosphere, which directly affects DIC, is of fundamental interest because of its capacity to control the changing climate. air-sea exchange is governed by solubility, water temperature, gas transfer velocity, and the partial pressure gradient of CO2 between seawater and air [e.g., Wanninkhof, 1992]. This exchange drives a net global annual oceanic uptake of anthropogenic carbon estimated to be about 2 Pg C yr−1 [e.g., Takahashi et al., 2009; Mikaloff Fletcher et al., 2006; Khatiwala et al., 2009; Wanninkhof et al., 2013]. Observational inferences suggest that the Southern Ocean is responsible for absorbing half of this global annual uptake [e.g., Takahashi et al., 2012]. However, there are large uncertainties associated with the estimates of carbon flux, especially in the Southern Ocean [e.g., Mikaloff Fletcher et al., 2006; Gruber et al., 2009; Le Quéré et al., 2009; Fay et al., 2014; Landschützer et al., 2014; Munro et al., 2015]. These uncertainties derive from the accuracy of measurements of wind speed and the parameterization of the gas transfer rate [e.g., Signorini and McClain, 2009], observational uncertainty, and uncertainty associated with mapping methods [e.g., Mikaloff Fletcher et al., 2006; Takahashi et al., 2002].
Reducing the uncertainties by increasing data coverage is extremely important, as the air-sea CO2 flux and the ocean carbon concentration are known to have large spatial and temporal variability, from seasonal to multidecadal scales [e.g., Takahashi et al., 2009; Lenton et al., 2012; Resplandy et al., 2014; Landschützer et al., 2014, 2015; Resplandy et al., 2015]. Despite the growing dataset of in situ observations of carbon and nutrients [Bakker, 2014, 2016; Key et al., 2015; Olsen et al., 2016], observing the Southern Ocean is still temporally and spatially limited due to its rough conditions and remoteness [Takahashi et al., 2009]. The Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling (SOCCOM) project is greatly expanding the observational coverage in space and time, by deploying an array of autonomous floats equipped with temperature, salinity, and biogeochemical sensors, and using relationships between the properties to derive the components of the carbon system [Williams et al., 2017].
Closing the Southern Ocean carbon budget using observations alone is therefore very challenging. To pull together these many, yet still sparse, observations of the Southern Ocean carbon system, we use state estimation, which combines these observations with an ocean model. Incorporation of a model reveals the locations and drivers of maximum variability, across multiple temporal and spatial scales, and in the multiple physical and biogeochemical regimes that make up the Southern Ocean. This is a crucial step if we want to improve our understanding of the role of the Southern Ocean in the evolving global climate system. We use the novel Biogeochemical Southern Ocean State Estimate (B-SOSE) [Verdy and Mazloff, 2017], a data-assimilating model solution at 1/3° resolution. B-SOSE is an integral part of SOCCOM, designed to connect observations with unconstrained models, particularly for biogoechemical cycles. Using a model such as B-SOSE, which assimilates both the physical and the biogeochemical states, instead of a nonassimilating forward model has the advantage of reducing the disparity between observations and model output, in both the ocean circulation and the carbon system. Development of the biological-physical coupled B-SOSE was preceded by the necessary step of a nonoptimized, forward and quasi-steady state simulation. Comparison of this forward model and B-SOSE (Appendix Appendix A) provides insight for other unconstrained climate models, whose improvement is one of the goals of SOCCOM.
Here we diagnose the DIC budget in B-SOSE at each model horizontal point integrated over the top 650 m, and contrast the budget in three different regions: the subtropics, the ACC, and the Antarctic. An analysis of the significance of each component of the carbon budget is given on temporal scales ranging from 10 days to 5 years. The analysis here is the first application of the newly developed B-SOSE [Verdy and Mazloff, 2017] to the Southern Ocean DIC budget, and the first intensive analysis of that budget in a state estimate. This analysis provides a hypothesis on the order of magnitude of the different components of the DIC budget, as well as the locations of major spatial and temporal variations in the budget components. These can inform both the interpretation of observations such as from SOCCOM biogeochemical (BGC) floats as well as deployment planning for future BGC floats, in addition to providing an independent validation for climate models with biogeochemistry.
The Biogeochemical Southern Ocean State Estimate (B-SOSE) [Verdy and Mazloff, 2017] is a 1/3° physical-biogeochemical data-assimilating model that currently covers the years 2008–2012, and which is publicly available at http://sose.ucsd.edu/bsose_solution_Iter105.html. B-SOSE uses the adjoint method to optimize the model, minimizing a weighted least squares sum of the misfits between the model solution and observations. Observations include both physical and biogeochemical properties and come from several sources including Argo floats [Gould et al., 2004], biogeochemical Argo (BGC-Argo) (http://runt.ocean.washington.edu/o2), instrumented Southern elephant seals (http://biology.st-andrews.ac.uk/seaos), the World Ocean Atlas 2013 (WOA) [Garcia et al., 2014a, 2014b], the GLODAP version 2 (GLODAPv2 hereafter) in situ product [Key et al., 2015; Olsen et al., 2016], the Surface Ocean CO2 Atlas (SOCAT) version 4 [Bakker, 2016], sea surface height observations from the Radar Altimetry Database System, sea ice concentration from the National Snow and Ice Data Center [Meier et al., 2016], conductivity-temperature-depth sections and expendable bathythermographs.
B-SOSE is developed from the previous 1/6° SOSE of Mazloff et al. , but with half the resolution, and is part of an ongoing modeling effort toward the development of a 1/12° resolution state estimate. The lower resolution B-SOSE has been a necessary development step, which also included a biogeochemical forward model that is similar to B-SOSE but without constraints (Appendix Appendix A). B-SOSE is spun up for 3 years and then optimized, using the adjoint method. The procedure to assimilate data requires extensive testing, and by reducing resolution the computational cost is considerably diminished. Despite the lack of eddies at this lower resolution, the analysis gives important insights into the large-scale carbon system in the Southern Ocean. Furthermore, even with the reduced resolution, the B-SOSE solution constrained to available observations can be used as validation for other forward biogeochemical models.
The B-SOSE physical configuration is described in section 2.1. Section 2.2 gives an overview of the biological model. Readers are referred to Verdy and Mazloff  for further details of the model configuration of B-SOSE.
2.1 The Physical Model
The physical state of the Southern Ocean in SOSE is simulated using the MITgcm [Marshall et al., 1997], with a domain that spans from 78°S to the equator. The purely physical SOSE has a resolution of 1/6°, 42 vertical levels, and covers the years 2005–2010 [Mazloff et al., 2010]; it has been used in a very large number of studies [e.g., Abernathey et al., 2016; Masich et al., 2015; Tamsitt et al., 2016]. B-SOSE, which is a separate state estimate in the same family, is configured using a Mercator projection with 1/3° resolution, which provides 32 km resolution at about 30°S and reaches 8 km by 78°S, while from 30°S to the equator the resolution telescopes out. Resolved instabilities do not include the most energetic mesoscale eddies at the first baroclinic Rossby radius: the baroclinic Rossby radius varies from 35 km at approximately 26.6°S to approximately 6 km at 75°S [Chelton et al., 1998]. The model does not include any mesoscale eddy parameterization and thus underrepresents mesoscale structures. Thus B-SOSE can only be used to investigate large-scale processes in the Southern Ocean. The vertical grid is a z-coordinate with 52 vertical levels of thickness ranging from about 4 m at the surface to 400 m in the abyss. The model covers years 2008–2012, with a time step of 1 h. Diagnostics are stored in 5 day averages.
Realistic topography from the 1 arc min global relief model ETOPO1 [Amante and Eakins, 2009] is implemented in the model. Partially filled cells [Adcroft et al., 1997] are used to represent bathymetry, with a quadratic bottom drag with a value of 0.002.
Initial conditions merge SOSE [Mazloff et al., 2010] and the global state estimation of ECCO version 4 [Forget et al., 2015], in order to cover the latitude band from the northern boundary of SOSE (25°S) to the equator. The global atmospheric ECMWF ERA-interim reanalysis of Dee et al.  provides the first-guess atmospheric state at a time step of 6 h. This forces the model using the bulk formulae of Large and Yeager . Through the adjoint method, the atmospheric state is then adjusted to better fit the observations. River and Antarctic discharges are implemented using the freshwater continental runoff mixed product of Dai and Trenberth  and an estimated distributed Antarctic discharge from Hammond and Jones . To represent ice dynamics and thermodynamics, an ice component, formulated in Losch et al.  and Fenty and Heimbach , is coupled to the ocean model. Additional physical parameters implemented in the simulation are summarized in Table 1.
|Tracer advection scheme||Third-order direct space and time scheme||Third-order upwind scheme|
|Background eddy viscosity||10 m2 s−1||10−3 m2 s−1|
|Leith biharmonic viscosity factor||2|
|Salinity and temperature harmonic diffusivity||10 m2 s−1||10−4 m2 s−1|
|Salinity and temperature biharmonic diffusivity||1010 m4 s−1|
|Tracer harmonic diffusivity||1 m2 s−1||10−5 m2 s−1|
2.2 The Biogeochemical Component
The biogeochemical component of B-SOSE is derived from the Biogeochemistry with Light, Iron, Nutrient, and Gases model (BLING) [Galbraith et al., 2010]. BLING includes eight tracers: DIC, alkalinity, oxygen, iron, and inorganic and organic forms of nitrogen and phosphorus. Tracers are initialized from the following sources: DIC and alkalinity from the GLODAPv2 climatology [Lauvset et al., 2016; Key et al., 2015]; oxygen, silicate, nitrogen, and phosphorus from the World Ocean Atlas 2013 climatologies [Garcia et al., 2014a, 2014b]; iron, dissolved organic matter, and dissolved organic nitrogen and phosphorus from a coarse resolution coupled model simulation with BLING version 2 (E. Galbraith, personal communication). Additionally, the model includes aeolian iron deposition data from Mahowald et al. . Atmospheric pCO2 is from the CarbonTracker product [Peters et al., 2007]. Surface pCO2 is diagnosed explicitly via carbonate chemistry [Williams and Follows, 2011] and air-sea CO2 flux is parameterized following Wanninkhof .
Pc0 is the maximum photosynthesis rate; LI, , LFe are functions describing limitation by light, nitrate, phosphate, and iron, respectively; λ0 and B0 are constants; k is a constant chosen according to Eppley ; T is temperature. The power-law dependence in the loss function (3), with the exponent set to n = 3 for large cells and n = 1 for small cells, is based on Dunne et al. . Note that diazotrophs are not limited by nitrate ( ) and have the additional constraint of requiring temperatures above 14°C to grow.
More details on the biogeochemical model formulation can be found in Galbraith et al.  and Verdy and Mazloff , in particular their Table 1. Simulated biogeochemical fields have been extensively validated in Verdy and Mazloff  against in situ observations and climatologies (World Ocean Atlas 2013v2 of Garcia et al. [2014a, 2014b] and GLODAPv2 product of Key et al.  and Lauvset et al. ), and comparisons can also be found at http://sose.ucsd.edu/bsose_valid.html. Results in Verdy and Mazloff  show that B-SOSE captures the large-scale patterns of carbon, oxygen, and nutrients.
2.3 Dissolved Inorganic Carbon Budget
The upper ocean DIC budget is computed and closed at each grid point using 5 day averages, and then averaged over 650 m depth. This depth was chosen to include the deepest modeled mixed layer, as in Tamsitt et al. ; below this depth the spatially averaged DIC temporal variance is reduced by more than 70% (not shown for brevity).
Furthermore, we divide the horizontal velocity into geostrophic and ageostrophic components, with the latter defined as the residual between the model velocity and the geostrophic term: , where , with f the Coriolis parameter, ρ0 a reference density, and p the model pressure. The ageostrophic term is primarily associated with wind-driven Ekman transport, which sets its large-scale features, and with local effects due to the interaction between the flow and the topography. These terms will be diagnosed in section 3.3.
The goal of this work is to identify the large-scale processes impacting the spatial and temporal structure of DIC concentration in B-SOSE. One caveat is that, due to the model resolution and the absence of sophisticated parameterizations, mesoscale eddies and submesoscale processes are poorly represented. Unless otherwise specified, temporal means are computed over 5 years from January 2008 to December 2012, and vertical averages calculated over the upper 650 m (indicated by the symbol).
The latitudinal extent of the analysis region is 26.6°S–78°S. We divide this into three domains, characterizing the main features of each region and highlighting the differences between them. The regions (Figure 1) are (1) the ACC (blue shaded in figure), (2) the subtropical region north of the ACC (red), and (3) the Antarctic region south of the ACC (in gray, with the Weddell Gyre highlighted in green). The ACC boundary limits are chosen using the northern and southernmost uninterrupted mean model sea surface height contours through the Drake Passage (Figure 1). We use these as proxies for the Subantarctic (north) and the Southern ACC fronts (south), following Tamsitt et al. [2016, section 2.b].
A series of figures showing the misfit between B-SOSE and observations is available at http://sose.ucsd.edu/bsose_valid.html. Here the reader can find profiles, horizontal maps, and vertical sections of the difference in time and space between model output and observations. Overall, there is good agreement between B-SOSE and observations; however, there are some locations where the misfit is large, hypothesized to be due to model errors in the physical circulation. Though the misfit magnitudes are steady in time, B-SOSE DIC does exhibit a drift. Northeast of the Drake Passage and at midlatitudes in the Indian Ocean, misfits are significant and the drift is likely spurious. Elsewhere, the drift may be part of a natural change in the carbon system. For the present analysis, we do not remove the linear drift in order to preserve a representation of the natural drift of the carbon system.
3.1 Mean and Variance of DIC
The time and depth (0–650 m) average DIC concentration ( , Figure 2a) has a meridional gradient structure, with largest concentrations in the Weddell and Ross Seas, where carbon-rich deep waters from the northern basins have upwelled and fill the upper water column, and lowest values in the subtropics, where carbon and nutrients have been heavily utilized in the upper water column. The DIC inventory compares well with the GLODAPv2 product of Key et al.  and Lauvset et al.  (Figure 2b), though the DIC in B-SOSE is biased high by several percent over most of the domain, likely due to the fact that the model represents 2008–2012, whereas GLODAPv2 bins observations (primarily collected in summer) that span a temporal range from 1973. The largest differences from GLODAPv2 are east of the Drake Passage and south of Tasmania, where the model exceeds the GLODAPv2 product by about 0.7 mol C m−3 (note that the color in figure is saturated), over the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge (approximately at 150°W), and in the Indian Ocean at ∼60°E, where the model has a deficit of ∼0.2 mol C m−3 with respect to the product.
Figures 2c and 2d show the temporal DIC variability in B-SOSE, computed as the standard deviation of (panel c), and of its rate of change ( , panel d), over the 5 year model span. The variability is concentrated in several hot spots: the Brazil-Malvinas confluence (60°W–45°W), east of the Drake Passage, east of Kerguelen Plateau ( E–105 E) and along the Subantarctic Front in the Indian Ocean, the subtropical Pacific between 135°E and 150°E, between the Southeast Indian Ridge and Macquarie Ridge (150°E–170°E), and near the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge (around 150°W). The causes for such hot spots are the focus of the next sections.
3.2 Mean Carbon Budget Terms
Focusing on the time and depth average terms determines which terms sustain the mean state and its variance (Figure 3). Overall, ADV is the largest term (Figure 3a) and balances the mean DIC tendency (TEND hereafter) in several locations (Figure 3f). We find a small positive change in the mean tendency of DIC, the aforementioned drift, which is simply the variation between the final and the initial timesteps. The maximum increase found at the end of the simulation (∼0.013 mol C m−3 yr−1) is in the ACC south of New Zealand, which corresponds to a change of about 0.5% from the initial state. Atmospheric CO2 increases in time, and we expect some oceanic trend in response.
We discuss the general budget in three regions:
In the Antarctic Circumpolar Current the tendency of DIC (Figure 3f) and the ADV term (Figure 3a) show a similar spatial pattern, indicating ADV is the main driver of the TEND variability. Significant ADV DIC supply occurs in the Southern ACC Front region in the Indian Ocean, and also at the Malvinas and southwest of South America. DIFF increases DIC in the northern part of the ACC and decreases it in the southern part (Figure 3b). Small-scale structures with large values of DIFF are associated with meandering fronts. BIO (Figure 3c) is negative everywhere in the ACC, reflecting that draw down by biological production is larger than remineralization. Air-sea CO2 flux increases DIC along the southern part of the ACC, in the Malvinas Current, in the central Atlantic sector, and along the Subantarctic Front in the Pacific sector. DILUT reduces the concentration of DIC near the southern ACC boundary, due to both precipitation and sea ice melt (see Figure 5d and the blue spots crossing the southern ACC Front in Figure 3e). DILUT drives an increase in DIC concentration in the northern part of the ACC due to net evaporation.
In the subtropical region the ADV term (Figure 3a) reduces DIC except in the Brazil Current and in the South Pacific. ADV is again the largest term and is in part balanced by DIFF, , and DILUT (Figures 3b, 3d, and 3e). In boundary currents, southeast of Australia and north of the Subantarctic Front not only ADV, but also other mechanisms, described below, have a large impact on the DIC. Overall, diffusive processes supply DIC to the upper ocean (Figure 3b), whereas BIO drives a sink of DIC in the very productive boundary currents in the South Atlantic and southern Indian Oceans. Elsewhere, BIO is largely reduced and, in the northernmost areas of the Indian and Atlantic Oceans, remineralization drives a supply of DIC. The term (Figure 3d) shows patterns of opposite sign in each basin, however the carbon uptake in boundary currents and in the productive area south-east of Australia is larger than the net outgassing in this region, and the net effect results in a net uptake (shown in the following section 3.5.2). Finally, the DILUT component (Figure 3e) increases the overall upper ocean DIC concentration due to evaporation, but areas in which the concentration decreases due to precipitation are also present, and appear mostly in the Pacific sector.
In the Antarctic region ADV likewise dominates the local balance, setting the mean TEND. In general, ADV is a source of carbon, as is , while biological production and dilution (precipitation and sea ice melting) act as sinks of carbon concentration. An exception to this generality is at the Antarctic continental shelf. Here air-sea CO2 fluxes (Figure 3d) can be as important as ADV. Furthermore, DILUT (Figure 3e) is large and positive almost everywhere due to sea ice formation and export. For a given volume of water, sea ice formation increases the concentration of DIC. The model does not represent DIC uptake and advection by sea ice, nor any other drivers of DIC dynamics in the sea ice, such as entrapment of DIC during sea ice formation, precipitation/dissolution of ikaite, or bubbles of CO2 formed in brine, which directly affect DIC [Moreau et al., 2015]. Nevertheless, the effects of such assumptions in the model are small, as approximately 80% of DIC is naturally rejected by brine convection to the ocean [Moreau et al., 2015]. DIFF (Figure 3b) is also important near the continent, largely due to the horizontal component (not shown for brevity). Similarly, the BIO sink of DIC is influential in this region (Figure 3c).
In summary, almost everywhere ADV is the most important component setting the local mean state of TEND. However, there are numerous regions where the other components have equal importance.
3.3 Influence of Ocean Circulation on DIC
The impact of ocean circulation on the tendency of DIC (i.e., the ADV term in equation 8) is here analyzed in its components. Figure 4 shows the temporal and vertical average of ADV, , divided into vertical (panels a and b) and horizontal (c–f) components. A Reynolds decomposition of velocities and DIC is used to separate time means and anomalies, as described in section 2.3. The horizontal velocity has also been partitioned into ageostrophic (c) and geostrophic (d–f) components. Black contours in the figure are the ACC boundaries, defined above.
Each component of ADV has a large magnitude and is important for the tendency of DIC, except (Figure 4b). The vertical component, in which the mean (Figure 4a) represents the main constituent, reflects the large-scale wind-driven upwelling south of the Subantarctic Front, which brings deep and carbon-rich waters to the surface, and subduction of surface waters below 650 m in the subtropical region. However, smaller structures superimposed on this large-scale pattern have a strong impact in locations of large kinetic energy, such as over or next to prominent topographic features [Chelton et al., 1990].
The ageostrophic component (Figure 4c), which in the open ocean is associated with the wind-driven Ekman velocity, decreases rapidly from the surface to approximately 80 m, below which it is large only in locations of strong interaction with the topography (not shown). The positive values of in the ACC are explained by northward ageostrophic velocity acting on a negative gradient of DIC, as DIC decreases northward (Figure 2a). This represents an ageostrophic wind-driven transport of carbon-rich waters from Antarctica toward the subtropics (Figure 2a). Meanwhile in boundary currents, such as the Agulhas and the East Australian currents, the ageostrophic advection acts to export DIC from the subtropics via viscous and nonlinear dynamics.
The mean (Figure 4d) and anomaly (Figure 4e) of the geostrophic advection (Figure 4f), which is the sum of panels d and e, are largest in the ACC and in the presence of boundary currents (Agulhas, Malvinas, and East Australian currents). The presence of topography induces the largest hot spots, particularly in the ACC (Figure 4f). Near the Drake Passage and the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge the mean geostrophic component is compensated by the mean vertical advective term (Figure 4a).
The components of ADV have large magnitudes in several hot spots, but largely balance each other in these regions such that only the large-scale pattern emerges in the total mean of ADV (Figure 3a). In particular, ADV is largely due to the vertical processes of upwelling south of the Subantarctic Front and downwelling north of it. Ageostrophic flow exports DIC from the Antarctic waters, which contributes to the positive values of the mean ADV in the ACC (Figure 3a) and, together with the geostrophic transport, north of the Subantarctic Front in the Pacific sector. Finally, mean vertical advection and geostrophic flow supply DIC in the Malvinas Current, while the geostrophic component drives the largest export of DIC in the East Australian Current and in the Benguela current.
3.4 Drivers of the DIC Temporal Variability
We have given a qualitative view of how the different processes force the mean rate of change of DIC, or TEND. The correlation between the different components is complex and warrants a more detailed analysis. In this section, we focus on the drivers of the temporal variability of the TEND term, shown in Figure 2d.
3.4.1 Variance Explained
The variance explained by the diffusive transport is localized and only important on small spatial scales (Figure 5a), in particular over shallow or steep topography (gray contours in figure), and in some of the hot spots of the standard deviation of the TEND term (Figure 2d): in the Drake Passage, east of the Kerguelen Plateau and partly in the region east of 150°E. Mainly, this term reflects the horizontal diffusive transport, as the variance in the horizontal component is larger than the variance in the vertical diffusive transport (not shown).
The biological term (Figure 5b) in general explains 50% or less of the variance of the material derivative, except in localized regions. In the subtropics, for example in the Brazil and the Benguela Currents, the VE is approximately 80%. Furthermore, the biological term explains of the variance in the ACC north of the southern ACC Front, and some variance (less than 30%) in the Antarctic region. In the north part of the subtropical Atlantic Ocean, and close to Tasmania, New Zealand and the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge, the VE by BIO is negative.
Air-sea CO2 flux (Figure 5c) explains a significant percentage of the variance of the material derivative (with a median value of ). In the Indian sector, the flux shows larger values of VE east of Kerguelen Plateau, meaning that, together with the diffusive transport and biological processes, this term is partly responsible for the large variability of TEND in this region. Air-sea CO2 flux does not explain the variance of the material derivative in the seasonal sea-ice zone, which extends from Antarctica to just north of the southern ACC Front (see Figures 3e and 5d).
The DILUT term (Figure 5d) explains much of variance of the material derivative everywhere, with the exception of a few locations in the ACC sector, in the Malvinas Current and in the Indian sector close to Australia. The large signal that covers the Antarctic region and crosses through the southern ACC Front into the ACC is the signature of sea ice melt and formation processes, while in the subtropical region it indicates evaporation.
3.4.2 Temporal Scales of Variability
The analysis of the variance explained described above includes all timescales resolved in the 5 year span from 2008 to 2012. Here we separate the variability occurring at different timescales by applying a set of low and high pass Butterworth filters to the budget terms, and then recomputing the VE (equation 9) using the filtered components of g and f. In particular, we are interested in what governs the changes on timescales shorter than 45 days, between 45 and 365 days, and on interannual scales, longer than 1 year (maps in Figure 6). At the annual scale, each mechanism has the largest energy (supporting information Figure S1). However, we expect a large influence from the interannual scale as well [e.g., Landschützer et al., 2014, 2015; Fay and McKinley, 2013]. Again, we find that ADV explains the majority of the variability at all timescales, except along the coast of Antarctica for timescales shorter than 45 days (not shown). Therefore, as above, we calculate the variance explained (equation 9) of the filtered material derivative.
At scales shorter than 45 days, the diffusive transport (Figure 6a) explains more than 60% of the variance of the material derivative in a few localized spots and explains no variance elsewhere. The areas with large VE are located southwest of South Africa, south of Australia, in the coastal region of Antarctica and in the three hot spots of large variability of the TEND term (Figure 2d). By looking at longer timescales, the changes in the diffusive transport explain the variance of the material derivative in increasingly larger areas, from 45 to 365 days (central panel of Figure 6a), the DIFF term has significant VE in the central and eastern parts of the subtropical Indian and Atlantic Oceans and in the western part of the subtropical Pacific, in several spots in the ACC, mostly close to topographic features, and in a few locations of the Antarctic region. At interannual scales (right panel), DIFF explains a large amount of the variance of the material derivative over most of the Southern Ocean, with larger values close to coast, topographic features, and boundary currents.
At timescales shorter than 45 days, the biological term (Figure 6b) does not explain the temporal variation of the material derivative of DIC. Between 45 and 365 days, instead, BIO uniformly explains some variance of the material derivative in the ACC, except east of the Mid Atlantic Ridge, at 0°. The spatial structure of the VE at these periods reflects the pattern of unfiltered term shown in Figure 5b. By removing the annual cycle, the interannual VE by biological processes shows some patchiness, in particular in the subtropics. We find that BIO explains approximately 60% of the variance of the material derivative for timescales longer than 1 year in the south Indian Ocean, in some locations of the Ross and the Weddell Gyres, and southwest of South Africa.
The VE by for timescales shorter than 45 days (Figure 6c, left) is smaller than 50% in most regions. However, we find VE greater than 50% in the Malvinas Current and in the areas southwest of South Africa and between Australia and Tasmania. From 45 days to annual scales (center) the VE is mostly larger, especially in the subtropical region and in the ACC. However, the variability of still does not explain the variability of the material derivative in the southern part of the Southern Ocean. For timescales greater than 1 year (right) the VE by shows some large hot spots with values of in subtropical waters, in the ACC, and in the Antarctic region close to the Polar Front and in the western part of the Weddell Gyre, but low or negligible VE in the Ross Gyre and in the eastern side of the Weddell Gyre (Figure 6c).
DILUT (Figure 6d) explains ∼100% of the variability of the material derivative for periods shorter than 45 days, except in the Malvinas Current and in the areas west of Tasmania, east of the Kerguelen Plateau and east of the Drake Passage. At scales between 45 and 365 days, the VE by DILUT is large in the Antarctic region and to north of the southern ACC front. The northern part of the subtropics also shows significant VE, while in other regions the VE is small or negligible. The interannual variability of DILUT explains almost 100% of the variance of the material derivative in the western side of the Ross and Weddell gyres out to the edge of melting sea ice (see Figure 3 and discussion in section 3.1). Large VE is also found in the subtropical region, with the exception of a few spots, and in several localized patches of the ACC.
We find that ADV explains almost 100% of the temporal variability of TEND everywhere in the Southern Ocean, at any timescale (up to 5 years in our study). When one considers the full material derivative, however, the impact of the other components of the carbon budget is revealed. This analysis demonstrates that all the components are important, though their influence varies based on the timescale and location considered. Furthermore, this highlights that observations able to resolve a wide range of temporal scales (from short timescales of the order of few days, to several years) are crucial to capture the temporal variability of the carbon system [McKinley et al., 2017].
3.5 Carbon Budget
In order to quantify the impact that each process has on the tendency of DIC, we analyze the carbon budget. We first look at the volume average of the budget over the whole Southern Ocean and analyze the seasonal cycle (section 3.5.1), which is the most energetic mode of the carbon system variability (supporting information Figure S1). We then focus on the processes in three regions: the ACC, the subtropics, and the Antarctic regions (section 3.5.2) in order to highlight the spatial variability of different mechanisms.
3.5.1 Seasonality of the Southern Ocean Carbon Budget
The seasonal cycle of the volume averaged (from 0 to 650 m and from Antarctica to 26.6°S) DIC budget terms is shown in Figure 7. The decrease in DIC concentration (black curve) in the Austral spring and summer is dominated by the biological sink (red) and dilution due to freshwater input (cyan; either river input and precipitation in subtropical areas, sea ice melt and precipitation close to the southern ACC front, and sea ice melt in the Antarctic region). Overall, we find a net ocean uptake of DIC driven by air-sea CO2 flux (magenta; positive values indicate CO2 flux into the ocean). Diffusive processes, as expected from the previous analysis (sections 3.1 and 3.4), do not have a strong impact on the budget, however they do represent a constant source of DIC to surface waters across 650 m. In the volume average ADV is almost negligible in summer, but in colder months (May–November) it is a source of DIC.
3.5.2 Regional Carbon Budget
To summarize the spatial variability of the mean components of the carbon budget (Figures 2-4), we analyze the budget in three different regions, identified in Figure 1 as the ACC core (section 3.5.2), the subtropical waters north of the ACC (section 3.5.2), and the seasonal ice zone south of the ACC (section 3.5.2). Our aim is to focus on the main spatial features and on the differences between these regions. Unless otherwise indicated, the analysis in the following sections is based on the top 650 m, time average, and latitudinal integration of the budget terms. We show both the 5 year mean and the seasonal cycle of the budget terms. Overall, we find all terms vary significantly in space and time.
220.127.116.11 The Antarctic Circumpolar Current
The DIC budget is here analyzed as a function of longitude. At timescales shorter than 1 year the temporal change of DIC is driven by advection. This term tends to be positive (i.e., increasing the upper ocean DIC concentration) at every longitude in the ACC, except close to rough topography, such as around the south-east Indian Ridge (around 120°E), Macquarie Ridge (east of 150°E), the Pacific-Antarctic Ridge (east of 150°W), and east of the Drake Passage in the Malvinas Current (∼50°W). Approximately 1 order of magnitude separates the rate of change of DIC due to the circulation and the other processes. However, this disparity is reduced on longer timescales, as the advective term becomes diminished by time averaging. In what follows we present the 5 year average plot (Figure 8). In the 5 year average the advective term (blue line) is predominantly positive, largely due to the mean ageostrophic and vertical advective components (Figure 4).
Dilution (cyan line) from precipitation reduces DIC, except east of the Drake Passage, where we observe an increase of DIC due to evaporation. Furthermore, sea ice export into the ACC region and melting at specific longitudes (around 60°E, 180, 50°W and 15°W) enhance the DILUT further reducing DIC (see darker blue rings representing sea ice melt in Figure 3e and note how they sometimes cross into the ACC). On average, the diffusive transport of DIC (green curve) has a negligible impact in the budget.
Biological processes decrease the DIC concentration over the whole ACC (red). Locations with the largest biological DIC drawdown are the Kerguelen Plateau in the Indian Ocean sector at E, the eastern Pacific sector (east of W) and the Malvinas Current. The biological drawdown in these locations is expected, as these areas are well-known for the existence of large phytoplankton blooms [e.g., Blain et al., 2007; Moore and Abbott, 2000, 2002], particularly in spring and summer (Figure 9). Peaks of air-sea CO2 flux occur at the same locations of major biological effect: biological production can in fact drive a net uptake, as in the Kerguelen region [e.g., Jouandet et al., 2008], in the eastern Pacific and close to the Drake Passage. In addition, east of the Drake Passage there is net outgassing at the location of the Malvinas bloom area. Outgassing and biological production are here associated with evaporation and nutrient supply by ocean circulation.
Analyzing the seasonal cycle sheds light on the temporal variability of the budget (Figure 9). The ADV term has much larger amplitude than the other terms, and as such we present the material derivative, which is the sum of the ADV term with the DIC tendency. For each season, we also calculate the volume integrals of the different processes (histograms in Figure 9): here TEND (in black) and ADV (blue) terms are presented separately.
In spring, biological production and export of particulate organic carbon along with DILUT from precipitation and sea ice melt drive the material derivative (Figure 9). When integrated over the domain (see the histogram), the net carbon drawdown due to biological uptake and dilution by precipitation and sea ice melt is largely balanced by the supply from the ADV term. On average, we find that the net effect of the drives a small uptake of DIC, which is mostly due to the large DIC uptake in the Atlantic sector and east of the Kerguelen Plateau.
In summer, biological production strongly influences the spatial variability of the material derivative. Both DILUT and air-sea CO2 flux show a large variability in longitude. In some locations, such as at the Kerguelen Plateau or east of the Drake Passage, these two terms balance each other. Overall, the net effect of the DILUT and the carbon flux is small, as regions of evaporation are balanced by precipitation, and outgassing is balanced by ingassing. Also, the ADV term contributes to the supply of DIC, but overall the ACC budget in summer shows a net loss of DIC, mostly due the strong drawdown of carbon by biological production.
In autumn, biological export of particulate organic carbon continues, but its magnitude is decreased with respect to the warmer months. The largest impact still occurs at the Kerguelen Plateau and east of the Drake Passage. Overall, DILUT and air-sea CO2 flux, which both show a large longitudinal variability, drive the material derivative of DIC. The DILUT term mostly represents precipitation, except in the Pacific sector and east of the Drake Passage, which are areas of net evaporation. Carbon air-sea flux, which responds to the decrease of DIC due to precipitation and to the cooling effect that increases the solubility of carbon in seawater, yields a net ocean uptake (see the histogram), although east of several major topographic features there is outgassing. , BIO, DIFF, and DILUT almost balance each other. Thus, the net TEND (black bar in the histogram) is mostly driven by the ocean circulation.
In winter, the net BIO term (histogram) is negligible with respect to the other terms, as remineralization in the east Indian Ocean and in the Pacific sector is balanced by production occurring elsewhere. Again, DILUT (evaporation and precipitation) and air-sea CO2 flux vary strongly with longitude, and drive opposite net effects, with DILUT decreasing the DIC concentration and air-sea CO2 flux increasing it. The spatial pattern for the term shows a large uptake in the Indian Ocean sector and outgassing in the central Pacific. Overall, ADV, , and DIFF together drive a net uptake of DIC in winter.
Thus, the carbon budget balance in the ACC is strongly dependent on season and location. Two factors most important to the budget are (1) the large-scale upwelling and the northward Ekman transport of carbon-rich waters, which determine the largest input of carbon to the budget, and (2) topographic interaction, which sets hot spots where biological production is large. The change in DIC due to dilution and air-sea CO2 exchange are strongly variable with the location. Dilution acts as a constant sink of carbon in the ACC waters, while air-sea CO2 fluxes mostly drive a net ocean uptake, except in summer. In general, the spatial and temporal variability of the air-sea CO2 flux is determined by the DILUT term, the biological sink, and temperature changes (which affect the solubility).
18.104.22.168 Subtropical Region
The depth and time average of the DIC budget terms, integrated in latitude for the region north of the ACC to 26.6°S, are shown in Figure 10. The divergence of DIC advection decreases the DIC concentration almost everywhere due to downwelling (Figure 4a), with the exception being in the southeast Pacific and in some regions close to topography, where the mean geostrophic and ageostrophic advection terms (Figures 4c and 4f) supply DIC. However, unlike the ACC region, where the circulation dominates over the other processes, here the TEND is modulated by various mechanisms.
In the eastern Atlantic sector biological uptake occurs in the coastal upwelling system of the Benguela current ( E) along the west coast of Africa (Figure 4a) where nutrient supply triggers primary productivity [Boyer et al., 2000] from winter to summer (Figure 11). In this region, the flux of CO2 is positive in each season (Figure 11). The net ocean uptake is mainly driven by the drawdown of CO2 due to biology, as observed also by González-Dávila et al.  and Santana-Casiano et al. . This is also a region of net evaporation, which increases the DIC concentration in each season and, together with , drives the seasonal material derivative of DIC.
In the western Atlantic sector, the Brazil-Malvinas confluence (east of 70°W) is one of the most productive areas in the Southern Hemisphere [Moore and Abbott, 2000], and consequently one of the major locations of carbon uptake [Feely et al., 2001; Bianchi et al., 2009]. Our results show evidence of this process (Figures 10 and 11), in particular in warmer months. Another striking feature in this area is the large input from Rio de la Plata, at approximately 35°S, 55°W (Figure 3e): at this location, DILUT balances the supply due to advection of DIC driven by upwelling and geostrophic anomaly (Figures 4a and 4d, respectively).
In the central Atlantic sector, the large drawdown of carbon due to the circulation (Figure 10) is a signature of downwelling (Figure 4a). Biological productivity occurs in each season except autumn, where remineralization drives a small supply of DIC. The biological sink of DIC is particularly large in spring, where it drives air-sea CO2 flux into the ocean. Conversely, in winter the carbon flux is impacted by solubility, which increases when temperature decreases. A net evaporation explains the overall effect of the DILUT term.
In the Indian Ocean, the advective divergence draws down the DIC concentration, particularly in the warm, poleward flowing Leeuwin Current system west of Australia and in the region south of Australia. The low productivity of the Leewin Current is typical of a nutrient-poor environment lacking of upwelling (Figure 10). However, we do not find the expected enhancement of productivity (Figure 11) in winter and fall [e.g., Koslow et al., 2008], possibly due to the lack of resolved mesoscale structures in the model, which are known to contribute to nutrient delivery in this area [Koslow et al., 2008]. Around Tasmania, approximately between E–160 E, biological productivity drives CO2 uptake in each season. This is the most productive area of the subtropical region and also a region of large variability in evaporation and dilution processes (Figure 11).
The southeast Pacific site of deep winter mixed layers [Hanawa and Talley, 2001] shows a net increase of DIC (Figure 10), where input of carbon due to air-sea CO2 flux is as large as the export driven by downwelling of surface waters. Large peaks of positive TEND are concentrated in the eastern region, west of the Humboldt Current (between Chile and Peru, around W). The Humboldt Current is a highly productive area [Moore and Abbott, 2000], which drives carbon uptake in spring (Figure 11). At this location, the large upwelling (Figures 4a and 4b) and mean ageostrophic advection (Figure 4e) contrast the drawdown of DIC driven by biology and, on average, drive a net outgassing of CO2 (Figure 10). The seasonal budget of the southeast Pacific (Figure 11) indicates that both BIO, , and DILUT drive the variability and the pattern of the material derivative.
Overall, we find a small net DIC increase throughout the year, except during summer (inset in Figure 11). In spring, air-sea CO2 fluxes are driven and balanced by biological production, while carbon export due to ADV is in part balanced by evaporation. In summer, DIC decreases due to the combination of biological production, outgassing and export of DIC by ocean circulation, which are partly compensated by mixing and evaporation. In locations where biological production is small (between southeast Africa and Australia, and between New Zealand and South America), the reduced solubility due to warmer temperatures dominates the response in CO2 flux. The resulting outgassing in these regions is larger than the uptake occurring elsewhere. In autumn, all mechanisms except ADV and BIO increase the DIC concentration. In this season, the air-sea CO2 flux is largely balanced by biological production, while export by ocean circulation partly compensates the impact of the evaporation and mixing. The largest increase in DIC is observed in winter, due to a combination of mixing, evaporation, and large air-sea CO2 flux driven by both biological productivity and cooling.
22.214.171.124 Antarctic Region
The DIC budget for the Antarctic region, which is computed for the area extending from 78°S up to the southern ACC boundary, is shown as a 5 year mean in Figure 12 and as seasonal means in Figure 13. In this region, the tendency of DIC is almost everywhere positive (Figure 12). ADV and DILUT are the largest terms in the carbon budget and mostly compensate each other (Figure 12). These terms are strongly variable at all longitudes, and present larger peaks in the Prydz Bay Amery ice shelf, west of the Ross Gyre, east of the Amundsen Sea, and west of the Weddell Gyre, locations of large sea ice formation and export. In particular, geostrophic advection, which is responsible for the export of carbon in the western side of the cyclonic Prydz Bay, Ross and Weddell gyres (Figures 3, 4d, and 4f), is compensated by carbon dilution due to freshwater redistribution by sea ice in these locations (DILUT term in Figure 12). In addition to the effects of ADV and DILUT, the DIC concentration is affected by a net CO2 ingassing, which is modulated by the biological term. Mixing due to horizontal processes over the continental shelf is highly variable, with large values in the Ross Gyre. The histograms in Figure 13 reveal, however, that the net contribution of mixing is negligible.
We find that in spring (Figure 13) the sum of the biological sink and the reduced DIC concentration due to sea ice melt and runoff balances the net increase due to ocean circulation, ADV. The air-sea CO2 flux is negligible, as regions of small ingassing responding to biological production are compensated by areas of outgassing. There is a net dilution in these months due to the onset of sea ice melt in the Weddell Gyre and in the eastern part of the Ross Gyre. In the western Ross Gyre (around 180°) sea ice melt, and hence dilution, are delayed until summer [Arrigo et al., 1998].
Summer shows the largest DIC sink, where the change in the DIC material derivative is driven by the decrease in DIC concentration due to sea ice melt (Figure 13) and biological production. Due to warmer temperatures, the solubility pump favors outgassing. However, the air-sea CO2 flux is reversed, as a net uptake arises to balance the carbon export due to biological production and dilution.
In autumn the DIC material derivative is largely driven by DILUT, which mostly reflects sea ice formation. The spatial variability of the air-sea CO2 flux reflects the variability in the biological term, which is significant in the Weddell Gyre and negligible in most other regions. In this season solubility increases as temperatures decrease, promoting a net ingassing.
Due to the increase in sea ice cover during winter, air-sea CO2 flux and BIO, which reflects small net remineralization processes, are strongly reduced and their contribution to the change in DIC is negligible. Sea ice formation commences in the Weddell Gyre and continues in the Ross Gyre. Sea ice processes, together with DIC supply due to ocean circulation and remineralization, drive a net increase in DIC.
In the Antarctic region, as in the ACC and in the subtropics, the processes that control the DIC concentration are locally and temporally variable. Ocean circulation and sea ice processes are the main players in the carbon budget of the Antarctic region. Biology is important in warmer months as increased light availability, together with shoaling mixed layers due to sea ice melt, triggers production [Lancelot et al., 1993]. Sea ice export, biological activity, and supply/export of DIC due to the circulation then drive a response in air-sea CO2 flux.
126.96.36.199 The Weddell Gyre
We conclude the results section by exploring in more detail the Weddell Gyre carbon budget, as this is a largely undocumented and important regional component of the climate system. Figure 14 shows the volume average annual cycle of the Weddell Gyre carbon budget. ADV is strongly reduced in the gyre integral, compared to the regional budgets shown in the previous sections. Here the circulation increases carbon at a mean rate of mol C m−3 yr−1. In spring and summer the tendency of DIC is driven by sea ice and snow melt and biological production, consequently resulting in an uptake of CO2 from air-sea fluxes. During the rest of the year, TEND is mainly regulated by ocean circulation and sea ice production and runoff: as the formation of sea ice takes place (March–mid-September), air-sea CO2 flux is reduced and become negligible around winter.
4 Discussion and Conclusions
This work represents the first diagnosis of the upper ocean (top 650 m) DIC budget in a physical-biogeochemical state estimate of Southern Ocean. We investigate the impact of the various drivers of temporal change of DIC in three subdomains of the Southern Ocean, namely the ACC, the subtropics, and the Antarctic regions (see Figure 1), and provide an estimate of the relative impact of each process over different temporal scales. Because the model does not resolve small-scale structures, the focus is limited to large-scale processes.
We have found that the circulation, specifically the divergence of the advective flux, ADV (Figure 3), represents the largest factor contributing to the tendency of DIC in every location of the Southern Ocean (Figures 8 and 13) and explains most of the variance of the tendency of DIC at all temporal scales. Locally, the effect of the circulation on the temporal change of DIC is determined by both horizontal and vertical processes from both ageostrophic and geostrophic velocities (Figures 3a and 4). The large-scale overturning circulation is apparent, with significant DIC increase in wind-driven upwelling regions and subduction in the subtropical wind-driven downwelling regions. The northward Ekman transport over the ACC is influential. In the regional integral the net budget (Figure 15) shows that it is the vertical overturning component of ADV (vertical hatch) that dominates the advective supply/export of DIC. Nevertheless, in the boundary currents the net reduction of DIC (Figure 3) is due to the export by the geostrophic component. However, advection is a redistribution and not a sink or source, and thus the contribution of the advective flux is strongly reduced by volume-averaging over the whole Southern Ocean (Figure 7) or regionally (Figures 14 and 15).
The hot spots of larger variability of the tendency (Figure 2d) are driven by diffusive processes at frequencies shorter than 45 days (Figure 6a). Furthermore, at any temporal scale DIFF is important in localized spots, such as over the continental shelf, downstream of topographic features and in regions of meandering fronts. On average, instead, the diffusive term contributes with a large net input to the DIC increase only in the subtropical region, while it is strongly reduced in the ACC and is negligible elsewhere (Figure 15).
Biological processes are important for DIC changes near topographic features (Figure 8), in boundary currents (Figure 10) and in the marginal sea ice zone (Figure 12). Biological production acts as a sink of DIC generally during warmer months, and it is a strong component of the DIC budget throughout the whole year in the very productive areas around Tasmania and in the Benguela and Hubmboldt Currents (Figures 3c and 11). At timescales shorter than 45 days, this term explains the variability of the change of DIC only over the continental shelf (Figure 5b). Off the shelf it becomes more important at longer timescales. Finally, on average, BIO represents a net sink of carbon in every region (Figure 15).
The variability of DIC is also influenced by the air-sea CO2 exchange, which is a direct consequence of the difference of carbon pressure at the interface between seawater and air. B-SOSE shows a predominant uptake of carbon in each region (Figure 15), in part induced by the increase in atmospheric CO2. The large-scale mean CO2 flux patterns (Figure 3d) compare well with Takahashi et al. [2009, Figure 13], in the ACC and in the subtropical region. However, we do not find net outgassing in the Antarctic region, as in Takahashi et al. , which could be due to, other than a model bias, a different time span between that product and our model. The lack in year-round observations outside the Drake Passage prevents assessment as to which product is more accurate.
The net ocean uptake of carbon via surface air-sea CO2 flux locally occurs to balance the advective transport, the biological sink, and/or the dilution of carbon concentration due to precipitation, runoff and sea ice melt (Figures 8−14 and 15). Nevertheless, the variability in time and space of the CO2 flux is very large, and, though net carbon outgassing does not stand out in our mean state, it does in several locations and time scales: for example, (1) in the ACC we find larger peaks of outgassing at localized spots in all the three ocean sectors (Figure 9); (2) outgassing occurs in summer over the subtropical region except in locations where biological production is large, and it also occurs in autumn in the Pacific sector (Figure 11). However, we do not find any net outgassing in the Antarctic region (Figures 13 14). The float-based estimates of CO2 flux by A. Gray and J. Sarmiento (personal communication, 2017) infer outgassing in the ACC and subtropical areas, as we did, but they also find outgassing in the Antarctic region, which is not present in our analysis. The large variability of this region, which has been also highlighted by A. Gray and J. Sarmiento (personal communication, 2017), may be a cause of this discrepancy. Because of this variability, it is nontrivial to compare point flux estimates with our spatially integrated values. Validation of the spatiotemporal variability we have hypothesized in this work will be facilitated with increased observational coverage.
Finally, DILUT is a leading mechanism in driving the tendency of DIC south of approximately 50°S at all temporal scales (Figure 5d), and influences both biological processes and air-sea CO2 flux (Figure 12). In the subtropical zone, DILUT is important over interannual scales, where it drives a net increase of carbon (Figure 15) reflecting the excess of evaporation over precipitation and river runoff. Elsewhere, on average precipitation and sea ice export and melting reduce the DIC concentration (Figure 15).
In conclusion, the DIC budget in the Southern Ocean is regulated by a complex interaction of ocean transport, biological processes, air-sea exchange, sea ice mechanisms and mixing. The importance of each term depends on the time and space scales considered. Transport dominates the local impact, but can be reduced by spatial averaging. Diagnosing locations of greatest variability of DIC concentration, such as the ACC, the Malvinas Current, the Agulhas Current region, and east of Tasmania, is beneficial to both planning an observing system and drawing inferences from observations. By providing information on the scales of variability of the different drivers, the present work informs the carbon cycle which is presently inferred from sparse observations.
This work is a contribution of the Southern Ocean Carbon and Climate Observations and Modeling project (SOCCOM). SOCCOM is supported by the National Science Foundation under NSF award PLR-1425989. B-SOSE output is available at http://sose.ucsd.edu.
Appendix A: Comparison of B-SOSE With a Forward Model
An unoptimized 1/3° resolution forward simulation was developed prior to B-SOSE. The model was forced by atmosphere reanalysis alone (the global atmospheric ECMWF ERA-interim reanalysis of Dee et al. ), spun up for 3 years, and then integrated between 2005 and 2014, with a time step of 1 h. Physical and biogeochemical configurations of the nonoptimized model were the same as in B-SOSE (see section 2 and Table 1).
- Both models show a trend in the DIC concentration, but there is a significant reduction of the trend in the state estimate.
- The divergence of the advective transport of DIC in B-SOSE has a larger spatial variability, as the ocean data have informed structures in the flow that were absent in the forward model.
- Both remineralization and biological production are reduced with the optimization, especially remineralization in the subtropical area, and production in the ACC and subtropics.
- The optimized air-sea CO2 uptake is strongly reduced in several locations, such as around Tasmania, the Malvinas Current, in the subtropical Pacific, and in the ACC, where we also noticed the major differences in the biological term; also, there are several locations of outgassing in each basin in the ACC (discussed in the previous sections), which were absent in the forward run;
- The optimization reduced the freshwater flux everywhere in the Southern Ocean, and areas of net evaporation in the ACC emerged, which were not present in the forward run.
Despite the local differences, the integrated mean air-sea CO2 flux south of 44°S does not substantially differ in the two simulations. The models show in fact a mean uptake of 0.17 Pg C yr−1 (forward run) and 0.18 Pg C yr−1 (B-SOSE), which fit within the estimates of Gruber et al.  (0.34 ± 0.20 Pg C yr−1) and Takahashi et al.  (0.30 ± 0.17 Pg C yr−1).
B-SOSE still has problematic regions; a few biases have been identified in the upper ocean [Verdy and Mazloff, 2017]. These biases likely result from model error, and may be reduced by improving the model physics and representation of biogeochemistry. Increasing observations of nutrients and the carbon components (i.e., DIC, alkalinity and pH) will reveal how to improve the model solution. Observations from the autonomous floats of the SOCCOM project (https://soccom.princeton.edu/) or the repeated hydrographic sections of the Global Ocean Ship-Based Hydrographic Investigations Program [Talley et al., 2016] can provide these constraints. Despite remaining issues suspected in B-SOSE, the fit with observations is satisfactory in many regions [Verdy and Mazloff, 2017], which emphasizes the benefit of the optimization method. B-SOSE reveals structures of the circulation that were absent in the forward model, and we expect changes in the carbon cycle are better represented.
Supporting Information S1
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
2016), Water-mass transformation by sea ice in the upper branch of the Southern Ocean overturning, Nat. Geosci., 9(8), 596–601. doi:10.1038/ngeo2749.
2000), Importance of stirring in the development of an iron-fertilized phytoplankton bloom, Nature, 407(6805), 727–730.
1997), Representation of topography by shaved cells in a height coordinate ocean model, Mon. Weather Rev., 125(9), 2293–2315.
2009), ETOPO1 Global Relief Model converted to PanMap layer format, NOAA-National Geophysical Data Center, PANGAEA, doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.769615.
2004), Annual changes in sea-ice, chlorophyll a, and primary production in the Ross Sea, Antarctica, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 51(1), 117–138.
1998), Physical forcing of phytoplankton dynamics in the southwestern Ross Sea, J. Geophys. Res., 103(C1), 1007–1021.
2014), An update to the surface ocean CO2 atlas (SOCAT version 2), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 6, 69–90.
2016), A multi-decade record of high quality fCO2 data in version 3 of the surface ocean CO2 atlas (SOCAT version 2), Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8(2), 383–413. doi:10.5194/essd-2016-15.
1997), Changes of carbon dioxide in surface waters during spring in the Southern Ocean, Deep Sea Res. Part II, 44(1), 91–127.
2009), Annual balance and seasonal variability of sea-air CO2 fluxes in the Patagonia Sea: Their relationship with fronts and chlorophyll distribution, J. Geophys. Res., 114, C03018, doi:10.1029/2008JC004854.
2007), Effect of natural iron fertilization on carbon sequestration in the Southern Ocean, Nature, 446, 1070–1074.
2015), Iron budgets for three distinct biogeochemical sites around the Kerguelen archipelago (Southern Ocean) during the natural fertilisation experiment KEOPS-2), Biogeosciences, 12, 4421–4445.
2000), A mesoscale phytoplankton bloom in the polar Southern Ocean stimulated by iron fertilization, Nature, 407(6805), 695–702.
2000), Southwestern Africa: Northern Benguela current region, Mar. Pollut. Bull., 1(41), 123–140.
2015), Southern Ocean wind-driven entrainment enhances satellite chlorophyll-a through the summer, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 120, 304–323, doi:10.1002/2014JC010203.
2013), Subantarctic mode water formation, destruction, and export in the eddy-permitting Southern Ocean state estimate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43(7), 1485–1511.
1998), Geographical variability of the first baroclinic Rossby radius of deformation, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 28, 433–460.
1990), Geosat altimeter observations of the surface circulation of the Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 95(C10), 17,877–17,903.
2010), An iron budget during the natural iron fertilisation experiment KEOPS (Kerguelen Islands, Southern Ocean), Biogeosciences, 7, 455–468.
2004), Southern Ocean iron enrichment experiment: Carbon cycling in high- and low-Si waters, Science, 304(5669), 408–414.
2002), Estimates of freshwater discharge from continents: Latitudinal and seasonal variations, J. Hydrometeorol., 3(6), 660–687.
1990), On iron limitation of the Southern Ocean: Experimental observations in the Weddell and Scotia Seas, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 65, 105–122.
2011), The ERA-Interim reanalysis: Configuration and performance of the data assimilation system, Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc., 137(656), 553–597.
2005), Empirical and mechanistic models for the particle export ratio, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 19, GB4026, doi:10.1029/2004GB002390.
1972), Temperature and phytoplankton growth in the sea, Fishery Bull., 70(4), 1063–1085.
2013), Global trends in surface ocean pCO2 from in situ data, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 27, 541–557, doi:10.1002/gbc.20051.
2014), Southern Ocean carbon trends: Sensitivity to methods, Geophys. Res. Lett., 41, 6833–6840.
2001), Uptake and storage of carbon dioxide in the ocean: The global CO2 survey, Oceanography, 14(4), 18–32.
2013), Hydrographic preconditioning for seasonal sea ice anomalies in the Labrador Sea, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 43(5), 863–883.
2015), ECCO version 4: An integrated framework for non-linear inverse modeling and global ocean state estimation, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 3071–3104.
2010), Regional impacts of iron-light colimitation in a global biogeochemical model, in Proceedings From the 2010 AGU Ocean Sciences Meeting, AGU, Washington, D. C.
2014a), World ocean atlas 2013 volume 3: Dissolved oxygen, apparent oxygen utilization, and oxygen saturation, NOAA Atlas NESDIS 75, p. 27.
2014b), World ocean atlas 2013, volume 4: Dissolved inorganic nutrients (phosphate, nitrate, silicate), NOAA Atlas NESDIS 76, p. 25.
2014), Wind-induced upwelling in the Kerguelen Plateau region, Biogeosciences, 11(22), 6389–6400, doi:10.5194/bg-11-6389-2014.
2009), Seasonal variability of fCO2 in the Angola-Benguela region, Prog. Oceanogr., 83(1–4), 124–133, doi:10.1016/j.pocean.2009.07.033.
2004), Argo profiling floats bring new era of in situ ocean observations, Eos Trans. AGU, 85(19), 179–184.
2009), Oceanic sources, sinks, and transport of atmospheric CO2, Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 23, GB1005, doi:10.1029/2008GB003349.
2017), Freshwater flux from ice sheet melting and iceberg calving in the Southern Ocean, Geosci. Data J., 3: 60–62. doi:10.1002/gdj3.43.
2001), Mode waters, in Ocean Circulation and Climate, Int. Geophys. Ser., edited by G. Siedler et al., pp. 373–386, Academic Press, San Diego, Calif.
2004), What controls the uptake of transient tracers in the Southern Ocean?, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 18, GB2021, doi:10.1029/2003GB002103.
2008), A seasonal carbon budget for a naturally iron-fertilized bloom over the Kerguelen Plateau in the Southern Ocean, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 55(5), 856–867.
2015), Global ocean data analysis project, version 2 (GLODAPv2), ORNL/CDIAC-159, NDP-093, Carbon Dioxide Inf. Anal. Cent. Oak Ridge Natl. Lab., US Dep. Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., doi:10.3334/CDIAC/OTG.NDP093_GLODAPv2.
2009), Reconstruction of the history of anthropogenic CO2 concentrations in the ocean, Nature, 462(7271), 346–349.
2008), The effect of the Leeuwin Current on phytoplankton biomass and production off Southwestern Australia, J. Geophys. Res., 113, C07050, doi:10.1029/2007JC004102.
1993), Factors controlling phytoplankton ice-edge blooms in the marginal ice-zone of the northwestern Weddell Sea during sea ice retreat 1988: Field observations and mathematical modelling, Polar Biol., 13(6), 377–387.
2014), Recent variability of the global ocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 28(9), 927–949.
2015), The reinvigoration of the Southern Ocean carbon sink, Science, 349(6253), 1221–1224.
2009), The global climatology of an interannually varying air–sea flux data set, Clim. Dyn., 33(2–3), 341–364.
2016), A new global interior ocean mapped climatology: The 1
GLODAP version 2, Earth Syst. Sci. Data Discuss., 8(2), 325–340. doi:10.5194/essd-2015-43.
2009), Trends in the sources and sinks of carbon dioxide, Nat. Geosci., 2(12), 831–836.
2012), The observed evolution of oceanic pCO2 and its drivers over the last two decades, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 26, GB2021, doi:10.1029/2011GB004095.
2010), On the formulation of sea-ice models: Part 1: Effects of different solver implementations and parameterizations, Ocean Modell., 33(1), 129–144.
2008), Toward a mechanistic understanding of the decadal trends in the Southern Ocean carbon sink, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 22, GB3016, doi:10.1029/2007GB003139.
2005), Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 19, GB4025, doi:10.1029/2004GB002402.
2012), Closure of the meridional overturning circulation through Southern Ocean upwelling, Nat. Geosci., 5(3), 171–180.
1997), A finite-volume, incompressible Navier Stokes model for studies of the ocean on parallel computers, J. Geophys. Res., 102(C3), 5753–5766.
1990), Glacial-interglacial CO2 change: The iron hypothesis, Paleoceanography, 5(1), 1–13.
2015), Topographic form stress in the Southern Ocean state estimate, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 120, 7919–7933, doi:10.1002/2015JC011143.
2010), An eddy-permitting Southern Ocean state estimate, J. Phys. Oceanogr., 40(5), 880–899.
2017), Natural variability and anthropogenic trends in the ocean carbon sink, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 9, 125–150.
2016), NOAA/NSIDC climate data record of passive microwave sea ice concentration, version 2, National Snow and Ice Data Center, Boulder, Colo. [Available at http://nsidc.org/data/docs/noaa/g02202_ice_conc_cdr/.]
2006), Inverse estimates of anthropogenic CO2 uptake, transport, and storage by the ocean, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 20, GB2002, doi:10.1029/2005GB002530.
2000), Phytoplankton chlorophyll distributions and primary production in the Southern Ocean, J. Geophys. Res., 105(C12), 28,709–28,722.
2002), Surface chlorophyll concentrations in relation to the Antarctic Polar Front: Seasonal and spatial patterns from satellite observations, J. Mar. Syst., 37(1), 69–86.
2015), Drivers of inorganic carbon dynamics in first-year sea ice: A model study, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 120, 471–495, doi:10.1002/2014JC010388.
2015), Upwelling in the Southern Ocean, Phys. Today, 68(1), 27–32.
2015), Recent evidence for a strengthening CO2 sink in the Southern Ocean from carbonate system measurements in the Drake Passage (2002–2015), Geophys. Res. Lett., 42, 7623–7630, doi:10.1002/2015GL065194.
2016), The global ocean data analysis project version 2 (glodapv2)—An internally consistent data product for the world ocean, Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 8(2), 297–323, doi:10.5194/essd-8-297-2016.
2008), Internal tides and vertical mixing over the Kerguelen Plateau, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 55(5–7), 582–593.
2007), An atmospheric perspective on North American carbon dioxide exchange: CarbonTracker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 104(48), 18,925–18,930.
2007), Dissolved iron in the vicinity of the Crozet Islands, Southern Ocean, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 54(18), 1999–2019.
2014), Observed small spatial scale and seasonal variability of the CO2 system in the Southern Ocean, Biogeosciences, 11(1), 75–90.
2015), Natural variability of CO2 and O2 fluxes: What can we learn from centuries-long climate models simulations?, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 120, 384–404, doi:10.1002/2014JC010463.
2016), Quantifying the influence of sub-mesoscale dynamics on the supply of iron to Southern Ocean phytoplankton blooms, Deep Sea Res., Part I, 115, 199–209.
2009), Carbon dioxide fluxes in the Benguela upwelling system during winter and spring: A comparison between 2005 and 2006, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 56(8), 533–541.
2009), Effect of uncertainties in climatologic wind, ocean pCO2, and gas transfer algorithms on the estimate of global sea-air CO2 flux, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 23, GB2025, doi:10.1029/2008GB003246.
2002), Global sea–air CO2 flux based on climatological surface ocean pCO2, and seasonal biological and temperature effects, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 49(9), 1601–1622.
2009), Climatological mean and decadal change in surface ocean pCO2, and net sea–air CO2 flux over the global oceans, Deep Sea Res., Part II, 56(8), 554–577.
2012), The changing carbon cycle in the Southern Ocean, Oceanography, 25(3), 26–37.
2016), Changes in ocean heat, carbon content, and ventilation: A review of the first decade of GO-SHIP global repeat hydrography, Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci., 8, 185–215.
2008), Freshwater transport estimates and the global overturning circulation: Shallow, deep and throughflow components, Prog. Oceanogr., 78(4), 257–303.
2013), Closure of the global overturning circulation through the Indian, Pacific, and Southern Oceans: Schematics and transports, Oceanography, 26(1), 80–97.
2016), Zonal variations in the Southern Ocean heat budget, J. Clim., 29(18), 6563–6579.
2013), Stable Isotope Techniques in the Study of Biological Processes and Functioning of Ecosystems, vol. 40, Springer, Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, The Nethernlands.
2017), A data assimilating model for estimating Southern Ocean biogeochemistry, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 122, doi:10.1002/2016JC012650.
1992), Relationship between wind speed and gas exchange over the ocean, J. Geophys. Res. Oceans, 97(C5), 7373–7382.
2013), Global ocean carbon uptake: Magnitude, variability and trends, Biogeosciences, 10, 1983–2000.
2017), Calculating surface ocean pCO2 from biogeochemical Argo floats equipped with pH: An uncertainty analysis, Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 31, 591–604.
2011), Ocean Dynamics and the Carbon Cycle: Principles and Mechanisms, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U. K.