How Quickly Is Mercury’s Surface Evolving?
New measurements of impact craters on Mercury’s smooth plains suggest the topography of the solar system’s innermost planet is changing at twice the rate of landforms on the Moon.
For the last several billion years, collisions with meteoroids, asteroids, and comets have been the primary process modifying the surfaces of both the Moon and the planet Mercury. Over time, smaller impacts, debris ejected from these impacts, and other processes like thermal expansion and contraction degrade the craters these collisions leave behind and make them shallower. Here Fassett et al. use data from the MErcury Surface, Space ENvironment, GEochemistry, and Ranging (MESSENGER) mission to quantify the rate at which Mercury’s landscape is evolving and compare the results to the lunar surface.
Using topographic profiles of Mercury generated by two different techniques—direct laser altimetry measurements and high-resolution stereo images—the researchers acquired depth-to-diameter measurements of 204 similarly sized craters on Mercury’s smooth plains. Surprisingly, the results indicate that Mercury’s bowl-shaped craters are substantially shallower than those on the Moon and hence have been more highly modified, despite the fact that the volcanic plains on both bodies are close to the same age. Additional analyses using models that estimate the rate of landform evolution suggest that crater degradation is occurring twice as fast on Mercury as on the Moon.
This substantial difference in degradation rates raises a number of puzzling questions with potentially broad implications, including whether different weathering processes are occurring on the two bodies and if the crater population on the oldest terrains on Mercury might be highly modified by its fast rate of landform evolution. The results of this study should motivate more research on the factors that control the evolution of landscapes on these and possibly other airless bodies.
—Terri Cook, Freelance Writer
Editor’s Highlight—Comparing Craters
An analysis suggests that craters degrade faster on Mercury than the Moon, raising questions about landscape evolution on different planetary bodies.
Fassett et al.  present a detailed analysis of simple crater topography on Mercury that suggests more rapid landform evolution on Mercury than on the Moon (i.e., crater degradation). The analysis uses depth to diameter measurements of impact craters and state-of-the-art diffusion models to investigate degradation states of these craters. The demonstration that landscape evolution on both bodies occurs at substantially different rates has broad implications. Are the dominant processes at work different on each body? Are individual weathering processes enhanced or subdued on each? How do these differing rates affect crater counting and our understanding of surface ages? Overall, the measurement results and analysis of degradation rates suggest more work is needed to understand why the degradation rate on Mercury is faster, how it scales with crater size, and other factors that may have significant implications for understanding the landscape evolution of these bodies.
—Andrew Dombard, Editor, Geophysical Research Letters
- Article Category
- Research Letters
Evidence for rapid topographic evolution and crater degradation on Mercury from simple crater morphometry
- First Published:
- | Vol:
- | DOI:
Eos.org: Earth & Space Science News
Download the App
New Android App Available!
iOS App for iPad or iPhone
AGU Career Center
Featured Special Collection
Early results from Juno's mission at Jupiter including approach to Jupiter and the first perijove pass (PJ1). Juno's scientific objectives include the study of Jupiter's interior, atmosphere and polar magnetosphere with the goal of understanding Jupiter's origin, formation and evolution. This collection of papers provides early results from Juno's measurements of the gravity and magnetic fields, deep atmospheric microwave sounding, infrared, visible and ultraviolet images/spectra and an array of fields and particles instruments as well as context for the early results with respect to current theory and models of Jupiter's formation and evolution. Topics include both Juno - Jupiter related theoretical models and data analysis as well as collaborative observations made from Earth based assets.