Can tree planting really help mitigate climate change?
It depends on where, when, and how.
For centuries, nature enthusiasts around the world have hosted events to plant and care for trees. At the first U.S. Arbor Day, held in 1872, Nebraska residents planted an estimated 1 million trees. In more recent years, some groups have called for reforestation (planting trees in areas where they had formerly grown but were cut down, burned, or otherwise destroyed) and afforestation (planting trees in areas where they have not historically grown, such as in grasslands) with a new goal in mind: to help mitigate climate change.
When a tree takes in carbon from the atmosphere, it stores it throughout its lifetime through a process called carbon sequestration. The surrounding soil can sequester carbon for even longer periods, for hundreds, sometimes thousands, of years.
Still, scientists have questioned whether tree planting is a good way to mitigate humanity’s effect on climate. In particular, a landmark study in 2000 found that for most of the world’s forests, the cons can outweigh the pros. Trees that are planted in high-latitude (near the poles) regions often reflect less sunlight than the natural formations they replace, such as snowdrifts or grasses. When this happens, more radiation is absorbed at the Earth’s surface, warming the ground and the layer of air just above it. So, the study found, while it might be beneficial to plant trees in low-latitude (near the equator) regions, planting trees elsewhere could actually produce more warming.
A new study conducted by Mykleby et al. generally supports this conclusion and provides additional recommendations for afforestation efforts.
In light of the deforestation occurring in many tropical forests nearest the equator, the researchers chose to focus on midlatitude and high-latitude regions where afforestation might be more effective. They used a land surface model to simulate the different types of conifer, evergreen trees that grow in temperate and boreal regions of North America.
Then they checked the results of their model against data collected at field sites in the humid Pacific Northwest, the alpine Rocky Mountains, the eastern coast of North America, and boreal regions of Canada.
Overall, the researchers found that afforestation would be most effective in these regions of the United States (except for mountainous regions in the West) and coastal provinces of Canada (including Nova Scotia, New Brunswick, and British Columbia). Furthermore, they found two ways to maximize the benefits of afforestation: planting trees as densely as possible, and harvesting trees once they surpass their peak rate of carbon sequestration. In most forests they studied, this would be about every 35–45 years, but in the American Rockies it could be as many as 90 years.
The team hopes that by painting a clearer picture of forest–climate interactions, this study will help inform policy makers. They note that altering land use may help countries in their path to achieve climate goals set forth by the Paris Agreement, a worldwide effort to combat climate change.
-- Sarah Witman, Freelance Writer,
- Article Category
- Research Letters
Quantifying the trade‐off between carbon sequestration and albedo in midlatitude and high‐latitude North American forests
- First Published:
- | Vol:
- | DOI:
- New data potentially confirms presence of intact lava tubes on the Moon
- Improving the representation of the global ocean heat content
- Extraordinary Antarctic weather may have influenced outcome of early 20th century race to South Pole
- Exploring the mismatch between modeled and observed Antarctic sea ice area
Eos.org: Earth & Space Science News
Download the App
New Android App Available!
iOS App for iPad or iPhone
AGU Career Center
Featured Special Collection
Early results from Juno's mission at Jupiter including approach to Jupiter and the first perijove pass (PJ1). Juno's scientific objectives include the study of Jupiter's interior, atmosphere and polar magnetosphere with the goal of understanding Jupiter's origin, formation and evolution. This collection of papers provides early results from Juno's measurements of the gravity and magnetic fields, deep atmospheric microwave sounding, infrared, visible and ultraviolet images/spectra and an array of fields and particles instruments as well as context for the early results with respect to current theory and models of Jupiter's formation and evolution. Topics include both Juno - Jupiter related theoretical models and data analysis as well as collaborative observations made from Earth based assets.